Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Outcomes of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs Conventional Laparoscopy

Guglielmo Mantica, Francesca Ambrosini, Stefano Parodi, Stefano Tappero, Carlo Terrone Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, ItalyCorrespondence: Guglielmo ManticaDepartment of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Largo Ros...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mantica G, Ambrosini F, Parodi S, Tappero S, Terrone C
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2020-11-01
Series:Research and Reports in Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-safety-efficacy-and-outcomes-of-robot-assisted-laparosco-peer-reviewed-article-RRU
_version_ 1819172941273759744
author Mantica G
Ambrosini F
Parodi S
Tappero S
Terrone C
author_facet Mantica G
Ambrosini F
Parodi S
Tappero S
Terrone C
author_sort Mantica G
collection DOAJ
description Guglielmo Mantica, Francesca Ambrosini, Stefano Parodi, Stefano Tappero, Carlo Terrone Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, ItalyCorrespondence: Guglielmo ManticaDepartment of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, Genova 16132, ItalyTel +39 0105553935Email guglielmo.mantica@gmail.comAbstract: Pyeloplasty is considered the gold standard for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in cases of flank pain, recurrent stone formation or infection, and deteriorating renal function. Over the last two decades, minimally invasive techniques such as robotic (RALP) and laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) have become increasingly popular and have been moderately replacing the open approach. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive up-to-date review on safety, efficacy and outcomes regarding robotic repair of UPJO compared to the conventional laparoscopic procedure. RALP represents a viable and innovative alternative to conventional LP with a comparable success and complication rate both in adult and in paediatric fields. The robotic approach seems to add further technical advantages when compared to conventional LP but sustains a higher costs. Currently, the choice to adopt one of the different minimally invasive approaches depends on the surgeon’s preference or experience, and on institutional availability.Keywords: robotic pyeloplasty, laparoscopic pyeloplasty, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, hydronephrosis, pyeloplasty
first_indexed 2024-12-22T20:15:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f0f0d5df7d744aba3148a5d88f2b78f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2253-2447
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T20:15:11Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Research and Reports in Urology
spelling doaj.art-7f0f0d5df7d744aba3148a5d88f2b78f2022-12-21T18:13:59ZengDove Medical PressResearch and Reports in Urology2253-24472020-11-01Volume 1255556259133Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Outcomes of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs Conventional LaparoscopyMantica GAmbrosini FParodi STappero STerrone CGuglielmo Mantica, Francesca Ambrosini, Stefano Parodi, Stefano Tappero, Carlo Terrone Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, ItalyCorrespondence: Guglielmo ManticaDepartment of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, Genova 16132, ItalyTel +39 0105553935Email guglielmo.mantica@gmail.comAbstract: Pyeloplasty is considered the gold standard for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in cases of flank pain, recurrent stone formation or infection, and deteriorating renal function. Over the last two decades, minimally invasive techniques such as robotic (RALP) and laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) have become increasingly popular and have been moderately replacing the open approach. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive up-to-date review on safety, efficacy and outcomes regarding robotic repair of UPJO compared to the conventional laparoscopic procedure. RALP represents a viable and innovative alternative to conventional LP with a comparable success and complication rate both in adult and in paediatric fields. The robotic approach seems to add further technical advantages when compared to conventional LP but sustains a higher costs. Currently, the choice to adopt one of the different minimally invasive approaches depends on the surgeon’s preference or experience, and on institutional availability.Keywords: robotic pyeloplasty, laparoscopic pyeloplasty, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, hydronephrosis, pyeloplastyhttps://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-safety-efficacy-and-outcomes-of-robot-assisted-laparosco-peer-reviewed-article-RRUrobotic pyeloplastylaparoscopic pyeloplastyureteropelvic junction obstructionhydronephrosispyeloplasty
spellingShingle Mantica G
Ambrosini F
Parodi S
Tappero S
Terrone C
Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Outcomes of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs Conventional Laparoscopy
Research and Reports in Urology
robotic pyeloplasty
laparoscopic pyeloplasty
ureteropelvic junction obstruction
hydronephrosis
pyeloplasty
title Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Outcomes of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs Conventional Laparoscopy
title_full Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Outcomes of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs Conventional Laparoscopy
title_fullStr Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Outcomes of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs Conventional Laparoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Outcomes of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs Conventional Laparoscopy
title_short Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Outcomes of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs Conventional Laparoscopy
title_sort comparison of safety efficacy and outcomes of robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty vs conventional laparoscopy
topic robotic pyeloplasty
laparoscopic pyeloplasty
ureteropelvic junction obstruction
hydronephrosis
pyeloplasty
url https://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-safety-efficacy-and-outcomes-of-robot-assisted-laparosco-peer-reviewed-article-RRU
work_keys_str_mv AT manticag comparisonofsafetyefficacyandoutcomesofrobotassistedlaparoscopicpyeloplastyvsconventionallaparoscopy
AT ambrosinif comparisonofsafetyefficacyandoutcomesofrobotassistedlaparoscopicpyeloplastyvsconventionallaparoscopy
AT parodis comparisonofsafetyefficacyandoutcomesofrobotassistedlaparoscopicpyeloplastyvsconventionallaparoscopy
AT tapperos comparisonofsafetyefficacyandoutcomesofrobotassistedlaparoscopicpyeloplastyvsconventionallaparoscopy
AT terronec comparisonofsafetyefficacyandoutcomesofrobotassistedlaparoscopicpyeloplastyvsconventionallaparoscopy