An Overview of Strengths and Directionalities of Noncovalent Interactions: σ-Holes and π-Holes

Quantum mechanics, through the Hellmann–Feynman theorem and the Schrödinger equation, show that noncovalent interactions are classically Coulombic in nature, which includes polarization as well as electrostatics. In the great majority of these interactions, the positive electrosta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Politzer, Jane S. Murray
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Crystals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/9/3/165
_version_ 1828113821249568768
author Peter Politzer
Jane S. Murray
author_facet Peter Politzer
Jane S. Murray
author_sort Peter Politzer
collection DOAJ
description Quantum mechanics, through the Hellmann–Feynman theorem and the Schrödinger equation, show that noncovalent interactions are classically Coulombic in nature, which includes polarization as well as electrostatics. In the great majority of these interactions, the positive electrostatic potentials result from regions of low electronic density. These regions are of two types, designated as σ-holes and π-holes. They differ in directionality; in general, σ-holes are along the extensions of covalent bonds to atoms (or occasionally between such extensions), while π-holes are perpendicular to planar portions of molecules. The magnitudes and locations of the most positive electrostatic potentials associated with σ-holes and π-holes are often approximate guides to the strengths and directions of interactions with negative sites but should be used cautiously for this purpose since polarization is not being taken into account. Since these maximum positive potentials may not be in the immediate proximities of atoms, interatomic close contacts are not always reliable indicators of noncovalent interactions. This is demonstrated for some heterocyclic rings and cyclic polyketones. We briefly mention some problems associated with using Periodic Table Groups to label interactions resulting from σ-holes and π-holes; for example, the labels do not distinguish between these two possibilities with differing directionalities.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T12:16:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f173f7f48a14ecc9fe2a3fe2e7b55de
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4352
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T12:16:13Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Crystals
spelling doaj.art-7f173f7f48a14ecc9fe2a3fe2e7b55de2022-12-22T04:24:19ZengMDPI AGCrystals2073-43522019-03-019316510.3390/cryst9030165cryst9030165An Overview of Strengths and Directionalities of Noncovalent Interactions: σ-Holes and π-HolesPeter Politzer0Jane S. Murray1Department of Chemistry, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148, USADepartment of Chemistry, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148, USAQuantum mechanics, through the Hellmann–Feynman theorem and the Schrödinger equation, show that noncovalent interactions are classically Coulombic in nature, which includes polarization as well as electrostatics. In the great majority of these interactions, the positive electrostatic potentials result from regions of low electronic density. These regions are of two types, designated as σ-holes and π-holes. They differ in directionality; in general, σ-holes are along the extensions of covalent bonds to atoms (or occasionally between such extensions), while π-holes are perpendicular to planar portions of molecules. The magnitudes and locations of the most positive electrostatic potentials associated with σ-holes and π-holes are often approximate guides to the strengths and directions of interactions with negative sites but should be used cautiously for this purpose since polarization is not being taken into account. Since these maximum positive potentials may not be in the immediate proximities of atoms, interatomic close contacts are not always reliable indicators of noncovalent interactions. This is demonstrated for some heterocyclic rings and cyclic polyketones. We briefly mention some problems associated with using Periodic Table Groups to label interactions resulting from σ-holes and π-holes; for example, the labels do not distinguish between these two possibilities with differing directionalities.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/9/3/165noncovalent interactionselectrostatic potentialsσ-holesπ-holesdirectionalitiesclose contactselectrostaticspolarization
spellingShingle Peter Politzer
Jane S. Murray
An Overview of Strengths and Directionalities of Noncovalent Interactions: σ-Holes and π-Holes
Crystals
noncovalent interactions
electrostatic potentials
σ-holes
π-holes
directionalities
close contacts
electrostatics
polarization
title An Overview of Strengths and Directionalities of Noncovalent Interactions: σ-Holes and π-Holes
title_full An Overview of Strengths and Directionalities of Noncovalent Interactions: σ-Holes and π-Holes
title_fullStr An Overview of Strengths and Directionalities of Noncovalent Interactions: σ-Holes and π-Holes
title_full_unstemmed An Overview of Strengths and Directionalities of Noncovalent Interactions: σ-Holes and π-Holes
title_short An Overview of Strengths and Directionalities of Noncovalent Interactions: σ-Holes and π-Holes
title_sort overview of strengths and directionalities of noncovalent interactions σ holes and π holes
topic noncovalent interactions
electrostatic potentials
σ-holes
π-holes
directionalities
close contacts
electrostatics
polarization
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/9/3/165
work_keys_str_mv AT peterpolitzer anoverviewofstrengthsanddirectionalitiesofnoncovalentinteractionssholesandpholes
AT janesmurray anoverviewofstrengthsanddirectionalitiesofnoncovalentinteractionssholesandpholes
AT peterpolitzer overviewofstrengthsanddirectionalitiesofnoncovalentinteractionssholesandpholes
AT janesmurray overviewofstrengthsanddirectionalitiesofnoncovalentinteractionssholesandpholes