The Ebre Observatory seismological station: past and present instrumentation and noise conditions

A review of the past and present instrumentation at Ebre Observatory seismological station (EBR) is presented
 in this work. In order to assess the quality of EBR from the point of view of modern seismic instrumentation site
 requirements, the noise conditions at EBR are also investi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. Ugalde
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) 2003-06-01
Series:Annals of Geophysics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/4376
_version_ 1818930899055542272
author A. Ugalde
author_facet A. Ugalde
author_sort A. Ugalde
collection DOAJ
description A review of the past and present instrumentation at Ebre Observatory seismological station (EBR) is presented
 in this work. In order to assess the quality of EBR from the point of view of modern seismic instrumentation site
 requirements, the noise conditions at EBR are also investigated by means of velocity power spectral density analysis
 in the frequency band 0.01< f <15 Hz by exploiting the three component broadband and digital data processing
 current capability. A correlation between noise levels and meteorological conditions at the site is observed, using
 the data of a complete meteorological station located a few tens of meters from the seismic cave. Results show that
 for long periods ( f < 0.04 Hz) and wind speeds ranging from 0 to 15.5 m/s, seismic noise levels may vary up to 45
 dB for the horizontal components. These variations are related to tilts due to wind-generated pressure fl uctuations.
 Secondly, the seasonal variation of noise levels at the frequency band 0.04 < f < 0.3 Hz is characterized, obtaining
 that the amplitude of the seasonal variation is higher for secondary (up to 52 dB) than for primary (up to 44 dB)
 microseisms. On the other hand, a seasonal variation of the frequency of the three-component main noise peak is
 also suggested in this site and its variation is opposite to the velocity power spectral density amplitude evolution.
 Finally, a correlation between wind speed and seismic background noise is also observed at high frequencies.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T04:08:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f20157191234f969cc51390ee66f97d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1593-5213
2037-416X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T04:08:01Z
publishDate 2003-06-01
publisher Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)
record_format Article
series Annals of Geophysics
spelling doaj.art-7f20157191234f969cc51390ee66f97d2022-12-21T19:53:59ZengIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)Annals of Geophysics1593-52132037-416X2003-06-0146410.4401/ag-4376The Ebre Observatory seismological station: past and present instrumentation and noise conditionsA. UgaldeA review of the past and present instrumentation at Ebre Observatory seismological station (EBR) is presented
 in this work. In order to assess the quality of EBR from the point of view of modern seismic instrumentation site
 requirements, the noise conditions at EBR are also investigated by means of velocity power spectral density analysis
 in the frequency band 0.01< f <15 Hz by exploiting the three component broadband and digital data processing
 current capability. A correlation between noise levels and meteorological conditions at the site is observed, using
 the data of a complete meteorological station located a few tens of meters from the seismic cave. Results show that
 for long periods ( f < 0.04 Hz) and wind speeds ranging from 0 to 15.5 m/s, seismic noise levels may vary up to 45
 dB for the horizontal components. These variations are related to tilts due to wind-generated pressure fl uctuations.
 Secondly, the seasonal variation of noise levels at the frequency band 0.04 < f < 0.3 Hz is characterized, obtaining
 that the amplitude of the seasonal variation is higher for secondary (up to 52 dB) than for primary (up to 44 dB)
 microseisms. On the other hand, a seasonal variation of the frequency of the three-component main noise peak is
 also suggested in this site and its variation is opposite to the velocity power spectral density amplitude evolution.
 Finally, a correlation between wind speed and seismic background noise is also observed at high frequencies.http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/4376EBR stationinstrumentationseismic noise
spellingShingle A. Ugalde
The Ebre Observatory seismological station: past and present instrumentation and noise conditions
Annals of Geophysics
EBR station
instrumentation
seismic noise
title The Ebre Observatory seismological station: past and present instrumentation and noise conditions
title_full The Ebre Observatory seismological station: past and present instrumentation and noise conditions
title_fullStr The Ebre Observatory seismological station: past and present instrumentation and noise conditions
title_full_unstemmed The Ebre Observatory seismological station: past and present instrumentation and noise conditions
title_short The Ebre Observatory seismological station: past and present instrumentation and noise conditions
title_sort ebre observatory seismological station past and present instrumentation and noise conditions
topic EBR station
instrumentation
seismic noise
url http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/4376
work_keys_str_mv AT augalde theebreobservatoryseismologicalstationpastandpresentinstrumentationandnoiseconditions
AT augalde ebreobservatoryseismologicalstationpastandpresentinstrumentationandnoiseconditions