Radiological Criteria for Acceptable Alignment in Paediatric Mid-Shaft Forearm Fractures: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Forearm fractures are common in children. The remodelling capacity of growing long bones in children makes these potentially forgiving injuries, recovering with good outcomes despite minimal intervention. Clinicians rely on radiological characteristics that vary with age to guide trea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Scotcher M, Chong HH, Asif A, Kulkarni K
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2023-11-01
Series:Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.morthoj.org/2023/v17n3/forearm-fractures.pdf
_version_ 1827397782162374656
author Scotcher M
Chong HH
Asif A
Kulkarni K
author_facet Scotcher M
Chong HH
Asif A
Kulkarni K
author_sort Scotcher M
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Forearm fractures are common in children. The remodelling capacity of growing long bones in children makes these potentially forgiving injuries, recovering with good outcomes despite minimal intervention. Clinicians rely on radiological characteristics that vary with age to guide treatment decisions and minimise adverse sequelae. The purpose of this review was to consolidate the evidence base of radiological indications for intervention in paediatric midshaft forearm fractures. Materials and methods: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed for this review. Citable research output reporting radiological criteria for mid-shaft forearm fractures in paediatric patients (age ≤16 years) was screened and analysed to ascertain acceptable radiological criteria for nonoperative management. Results: A total of 2,059 papers were initially identified; 14 were selected following screening. Sagittal angulation >15°, coronal angulation >10°, and/or >50% (or >1cm) translation were the most common radiological indications for intervention in children aged 0 to 10 years. For children over 10 years of age, the most common radiological indication for intervention was sagittal angulation >10°, coronal angulation >10°, and/or >50% (or >1cm) translation. Conclusion: This study revealed a scarcity of high-quality evidence to guide management and significant variation in outcome reporting throughout the published literature. Since Noonan and Price's 1998 recommendations, there has been no significant evolution in the evidence-base guided threshold for intervention in paediatric mid-shaft forearm fractures. There remains a pressing need for a robust multicentre observational study using the patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) to address this complex and controversial area of uncertainty in paediatric trauma management.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:17:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f25ba9bdb2a459992262006363e1653
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1985-2533
2232-111X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:17:36Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
record_format Article
series Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
spelling doaj.art-7f25ba9bdb2a459992262006363e16532023-12-27T05:16:50ZengMalaysian Orthopaedic AssociationMalaysian Orthopaedic Journal1985-25332232-111X2023-11-01173263210.5704/MOJ.2311.005Radiological Criteria for Acceptable Alignment in Paediatric Mid-Shaft Forearm Fractures: A Systematic Review Scotcher M0Chong HH1 Asif A2Kulkarni K3Department of Plastic Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom Introduction: Forearm fractures are common in children. The remodelling capacity of growing long bones in children makes these potentially forgiving injuries, recovering with good outcomes despite minimal intervention. Clinicians rely on radiological characteristics that vary with age to guide treatment decisions and minimise adverse sequelae. The purpose of this review was to consolidate the evidence base of radiological indications for intervention in paediatric midshaft forearm fractures. Materials and methods: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed for this review. Citable research output reporting radiological criteria for mid-shaft forearm fractures in paediatric patients (age ≤16 years) was screened and analysed to ascertain acceptable radiological criteria for nonoperative management. Results: A total of 2,059 papers were initially identified; 14 were selected following screening. Sagittal angulation >15°, coronal angulation >10°, and/or >50% (or >1cm) translation were the most common radiological indications for intervention in children aged 0 to 10 years. For children over 10 years of age, the most common radiological indication for intervention was sagittal angulation >10°, coronal angulation >10°, and/or >50% (or >1cm) translation. Conclusion: This study revealed a scarcity of high-quality evidence to guide management and significant variation in outcome reporting throughout the published literature. Since Noonan and Price's 1998 recommendations, there has been no significant evolution in the evidence-base guided threshold for intervention in paediatric mid-shaft forearm fractures. There remains a pressing need for a robust multicentre observational study using the patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) to address this complex and controversial area of uncertainty in paediatric trauma management.https://www.morthoj.org/2023/v17n3/forearm-fractures.pdfpaediatricforearmfractureradiologicaloutcome
spellingShingle Scotcher M
Chong HH
Asif A
Kulkarni K
Radiological Criteria for Acceptable Alignment in Paediatric Mid-Shaft Forearm Fractures: A Systematic Review
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
paediatric
forearm
fracture
radiological
outcome
title Radiological Criteria for Acceptable Alignment in Paediatric Mid-Shaft Forearm Fractures: A Systematic Review
title_full Radiological Criteria for Acceptable Alignment in Paediatric Mid-Shaft Forearm Fractures: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Radiological Criteria for Acceptable Alignment in Paediatric Mid-Shaft Forearm Fractures: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Radiological Criteria for Acceptable Alignment in Paediatric Mid-Shaft Forearm Fractures: A Systematic Review
title_short Radiological Criteria for Acceptable Alignment in Paediatric Mid-Shaft Forearm Fractures: A Systematic Review
title_sort radiological criteria for acceptable alignment in paediatric mid shaft forearm fractures a systematic review
topic paediatric
forearm
fracture
radiological
outcome
url https://www.morthoj.org/2023/v17n3/forearm-fractures.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT scotcherm radiologicalcriteriaforacceptablealignmentinpaediatricmidshaftforearmfracturesasystematicreview
AT chonghh radiologicalcriteriaforacceptablealignmentinpaediatricmidshaftforearmfracturesasystematicreview
AT asifa radiologicalcriteriaforacceptablealignmentinpaediatricmidshaftforearmfracturesasystematicreview
AT kulkarnik radiologicalcriteriaforacceptablealignmentinpaediatricmidshaftforearmfracturesasystematicreview