Evaluation of differential renal function in children – a comparative study between magnetic resonance urography and dynamic renal scintigraphy

Abstract Background Urinary system anomalies, both congenital and acquired, constitute a relatively common clinical problem in children. The main role of diagnostic imaging is to determine early diagnosis and support therapeutic decisions to prevent the development of chronic renal disease. The aim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Małgorzata Gołuch, Agnieszka Pytlewska, Jędrzej Sarnecki, Paulina Chodnicka, Anna Śliwińska, Łukasz Obrycki, Elżbieta Jurkiewicz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-03-01
Series:BMC Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04694-2
_version_ 1797233261441712128
author Małgorzata Gołuch
Agnieszka Pytlewska
Jędrzej Sarnecki
Paulina Chodnicka
Anna Śliwińska
Łukasz Obrycki
Elżbieta Jurkiewicz
author_facet Małgorzata Gołuch
Agnieszka Pytlewska
Jędrzej Sarnecki
Paulina Chodnicka
Anna Śliwińska
Łukasz Obrycki
Elżbieta Jurkiewicz
author_sort Małgorzata Gołuch
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Urinary system anomalies, both congenital and acquired, constitute a relatively common clinical problem in children. The main role of diagnostic imaging is to determine early diagnosis and support therapeutic decisions to prevent the development of chronic renal disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance urography (MRU) in assessment of urinary system in children, by comparing differential renal function calculated using MRU with dynamic renal scintigraphy (DRS). Materials and methods The study group consisted of 46 patients aged 1 week to 17 years (median 7 (0.5; 13) years, 17 (37%) girls, 29 (63%) boys), who underwent dynamic renal scintigraphy due to various clinical reasons. All participants underwent MRU, which was used to measure differential renal function. Functional analysis was performed using dedicated external software (CHOP-fMRU and pMRI without prior knowledge of DRS results. MRU results acquired using pMRI were assessed for inter and intraobserver agreement. Results Statistical analysis of the results showed excellent agreement between MRU and DRS in measuring differential renal function with Pearson correlation coefficient 0.987 for CHOP-fMRU and 0.971 for pMRI, p < 0.001. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for these programs was 0.987 (95% CI 0.976–0.993) and 0.969 (95% CI 0.945–0.983) respectively, p < 0.001. The Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement for CHOP-fMRU results vs. DRS was − 6.29–5.50 p.p. and for pMRI results vs. DRS − 9.15–9.63 p.p. The differential renal function measurements calculated in pMRI showed excellent intraobserver and interobserver agreement with ICC 0.996 (95% CI 0.994–0.998) and 0.992 (95% CI 0.986–0.996) respectively, p < 0.001. Conclusions The study showed no significant differences between magnetic resonance urography and dynamic renal scintigraphy in calculating differential renal function. It indicates high utility of MRU in the evaluation of urinary system in children.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T16:13:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f3c26d410f04e39acb0752d79bb6287
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2431
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T16:13:22Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-7f3c26d410f04e39acb0752d79bb62872024-03-31T11:35:49ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312024-03-012411910.1186/s12887-024-04694-2Evaluation of differential renal function in children – a comparative study between magnetic resonance urography and dynamic renal scintigraphyMałgorzata Gołuch0Agnieszka Pytlewska1Jędrzej Sarnecki2Paulina Chodnicka3Anna Śliwińska4Łukasz Obrycki5Elżbieta Jurkiewicz6Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Children’s Memorial Health InstituteDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Children’s Memorial Health InstituteDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital BaselDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Children’s Memorial Health InstituteDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Children’s Memorial Health InstituteDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hypertension, The Children’s Memorial Health InstituteDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Children’s Memorial Health InstituteAbstract Background Urinary system anomalies, both congenital and acquired, constitute a relatively common clinical problem in children. The main role of diagnostic imaging is to determine early diagnosis and support therapeutic decisions to prevent the development of chronic renal disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance urography (MRU) in assessment of urinary system in children, by comparing differential renal function calculated using MRU with dynamic renal scintigraphy (DRS). Materials and methods The study group consisted of 46 patients aged 1 week to 17 years (median 7 (0.5; 13) years, 17 (37%) girls, 29 (63%) boys), who underwent dynamic renal scintigraphy due to various clinical reasons. All participants underwent MRU, which was used to measure differential renal function. Functional analysis was performed using dedicated external software (CHOP-fMRU and pMRI without prior knowledge of DRS results. MRU results acquired using pMRI were assessed for inter and intraobserver agreement. Results Statistical analysis of the results showed excellent agreement between MRU and DRS in measuring differential renal function with Pearson correlation coefficient 0.987 for CHOP-fMRU and 0.971 for pMRI, p < 0.001. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for these programs was 0.987 (95% CI 0.976–0.993) and 0.969 (95% CI 0.945–0.983) respectively, p < 0.001. The Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement for CHOP-fMRU results vs. DRS was − 6.29–5.50 p.p. and for pMRI results vs. DRS − 9.15–9.63 p.p. The differential renal function measurements calculated in pMRI showed excellent intraobserver and interobserver agreement with ICC 0.996 (95% CI 0.994–0.998) and 0.992 (95% CI 0.986–0.996) respectively, p < 0.001. Conclusions The study showed no significant differences between magnetic resonance urography and dynamic renal scintigraphy in calculating differential renal function. It indicates high utility of MRU in the evaluation of urinary system in children.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04694-2Magnetic resonance urographyDifferential renal functionDynamic renal scintigraphyPelvicalyceal dilatationCAKUTPediatric urology
spellingShingle Małgorzata Gołuch
Agnieszka Pytlewska
Jędrzej Sarnecki
Paulina Chodnicka
Anna Śliwińska
Łukasz Obrycki
Elżbieta Jurkiewicz
Evaluation of differential renal function in children – a comparative study between magnetic resonance urography and dynamic renal scintigraphy
BMC Pediatrics
Magnetic resonance urography
Differential renal function
Dynamic renal scintigraphy
Pelvicalyceal dilatation
CAKUT
Pediatric urology
title Evaluation of differential renal function in children – a comparative study between magnetic resonance urography and dynamic renal scintigraphy
title_full Evaluation of differential renal function in children – a comparative study between magnetic resonance urography and dynamic renal scintigraphy
title_fullStr Evaluation of differential renal function in children – a comparative study between magnetic resonance urography and dynamic renal scintigraphy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of differential renal function in children – a comparative study between magnetic resonance urography and dynamic renal scintigraphy
title_short Evaluation of differential renal function in children – a comparative study between magnetic resonance urography and dynamic renal scintigraphy
title_sort evaluation of differential renal function in children a comparative study between magnetic resonance urography and dynamic renal scintigraphy
topic Magnetic resonance urography
Differential renal function
Dynamic renal scintigraphy
Pelvicalyceal dilatation
CAKUT
Pediatric urology
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-04694-2
work_keys_str_mv AT małgorzatagołuch evaluationofdifferentialrenalfunctioninchildrenacomparativestudybetweenmagneticresonanceurographyanddynamicrenalscintigraphy
AT agnieszkapytlewska evaluationofdifferentialrenalfunctioninchildrenacomparativestudybetweenmagneticresonanceurographyanddynamicrenalscintigraphy
AT jedrzejsarnecki evaluationofdifferentialrenalfunctioninchildrenacomparativestudybetweenmagneticresonanceurographyanddynamicrenalscintigraphy
AT paulinachodnicka evaluationofdifferentialrenalfunctioninchildrenacomparativestudybetweenmagneticresonanceurographyanddynamicrenalscintigraphy
AT annasliwinska evaluationofdifferentialrenalfunctioninchildrenacomparativestudybetweenmagneticresonanceurographyanddynamicrenalscintigraphy
AT łukaszobrycki evaluationofdifferentialrenalfunctioninchildrenacomparativestudybetweenmagneticresonanceurographyanddynamicrenalscintigraphy
AT elzbietajurkiewicz evaluationofdifferentialrenalfunctioninchildrenacomparativestudybetweenmagneticresonanceurographyanddynamicrenalscintigraphy