Natural habitat partially mitigates negative pesticide effects on tropical pollinator communities

Land-use change and pesticides have been identified as two of the main causes behind pollinator decline. Understanding how these factors affect crop pollinator communities is crucial to inform practices that generate optimal pollination and ensure sustainable food production. In this study, we inves...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diana Obregon, Olger R. Guerrero, Elena Stashenko, Katja Poveda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-08-01
Series:Global Ecology and Conservation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421002183
_version_ 1818600099420307456
author Diana Obregon
Olger R. Guerrero
Elena Stashenko
Katja Poveda
author_facet Diana Obregon
Olger R. Guerrero
Elena Stashenko
Katja Poveda
author_sort Diana Obregon
collection DOAJ
description Land-use change and pesticides have been identified as two of the main causes behind pollinator decline. Understanding how these factors affect crop pollinator communities is crucial to inform practices that generate optimal pollination and ensure sustainable food production. In this study, we investigated the effects of landscape composition and pesticide residues on bee communities and their pollination services in Solanum quitoense Lam. “lulo” crops in Colombia. On 10 farms, located along a gradient of land use change that varied from 0.15 to 0.62 in their natural habitat proportion, we characterized the bee community visiting the crop, and carried out pollination experiments with bagged and open inflorescences to later estimate fruit set, weight, and diameter at every site. Additionally, we performed pesticide analysis on collected anthers through liquid chromatography to estimate pesticide risk coming from the crop fields using hazard quotients (HQ). Bee abundance and species richness decreased with increased HQ, but these negative pesticide effects were less detrimental in farms with higher natural habitat proportions. However, this buffer effect was lost at sites with very high HQs. Imidacloprid was frequently found in the anthers and there were extremely high concentrations in some farms (0.6 to 13,063 μg/kg), representing the molecule of greatest risk for bees in this context. Pollinator’s importance to crop yield was demonstrated in the exclusion experiments, where we found a reduction in fruit set (51%), weight (39%), and diameter (25%). We found a significant effect of bee richness on fruit set, while landscape composition and HQ had no significant effect on fruit set, suggesting that the last two factors do not affect yield directly, but indirectly through a decrease in pollinator diversity. Our results provide novel evidence that natural habitat loss due to the expansion of pastures for cattle ranching and pesticide residues in anthers reduce bee diversity and abundance in this Andean cropping system, but strategies to protect and restore natural habitat can help to buffer, until certain levels, these negative effects.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T12:30:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f439e6902a84450a2967e201e84be21
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2351-9894
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T12:30:06Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Global Ecology and Conservation
spelling doaj.art-7f439e6902a84450a2967e201e84be212022-12-21T22:31:43ZengElsevierGlobal Ecology and Conservation2351-98942021-08-0128e01668Natural habitat partially mitigates negative pesticide effects on tropical pollinator communitiesDiana Obregon0Olger R. Guerrero1Elena Stashenko2Katja Poveda3Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States; Corresponding author.Department of Agronomic Engineering, La Salle University, Yopal, Casanare 850008, ColombiaCROM-MASS Laboratory, Industrial University of Santander, Bucaramanga 680002, ColombiaDepartment of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United StatesLand-use change and pesticides have been identified as two of the main causes behind pollinator decline. Understanding how these factors affect crop pollinator communities is crucial to inform practices that generate optimal pollination and ensure sustainable food production. In this study, we investigated the effects of landscape composition and pesticide residues on bee communities and their pollination services in Solanum quitoense Lam. “lulo” crops in Colombia. On 10 farms, located along a gradient of land use change that varied from 0.15 to 0.62 in their natural habitat proportion, we characterized the bee community visiting the crop, and carried out pollination experiments with bagged and open inflorescences to later estimate fruit set, weight, and diameter at every site. Additionally, we performed pesticide analysis on collected anthers through liquid chromatography to estimate pesticide risk coming from the crop fields using hazard quotients (HQ). Bee abundance and species richness decreased with increased HQ, but these negative pesticide effects were less detrimental in farms with higher natural habitat proportions. However, this buffer effect was lost at sites with very high HQs. Imidacloprid was frequently found in the anthers and there were extremely high concentrations in some farms (0.6 to 13,063 μg/kg), representing the molecule of greatest risk for bees in this context. Pollinator’s importance to crop yield was demonstrated in the exclusion experiments, where we found a reduction in fruit set (51%), weight (39%), and diameter (25%). We found a significant effect of bee richness on fruit set, while landscape composition and HQ had no significant effect on fruit set, suggesting that the last two factors do not affect yield directly, but indirectly through a decrease in pollinator diversity. Our results provide novel evidence that natural habitat loss due to the expansion of pastures for cattle ranching and pesticide residues in anthers reduce bee diversity and abundance in this Andean cropping system, but strategies to protect and restore natural habitat can help to buffer, until certain levels, these negative effects.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421002183Bee pollinationEcosystem servicesImidaclopridLandscape simplificationNaranjillaLulo
spellingShingle Diana Obregon
Olger R. Guerrero
Elena Stashenko
Katja Poveda
Natural habitat partially mitigates negative pesticide effects on tropical pollinator communities
Global Ecology and Conservation
Bee pollination
Ecosystem services
Imidacloprid
Landscape simplification
Naranjilla
Lulo
title Natural habitat partially mitigates negative pesticide effects on tropical pollinator communities
title_full Natural habitat partially mitigates negative pesticide effects on tropical pollinator communities
title_fullStr Natural habitat partially mitigates negative pesticide effects on tropical pollinator communities
title_full_unstemmed Natural habitat partially mitigates negative pesticide effects on tropical pollinator communities
title_short Natural habitat partially mitigates negative pesticide effects on tropical pollinator communities
title_sort natural habitat partially mitigates negative pesticide effects on tropical pollinator communities
topic Bee pollination
Ecosystem services
Imidacloprid
Landscape simplification
Naranjilla
Lulo
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421002183
work_keys_str_mv AT dianaobregon naturalhabitatpartiallymitigatesnegativepesticideeffectsontropicalpollinatorcommunities
AT olgerrguerrero naturalhabitatpartiallymitigatesnegativepesticideeffectsontropicalpollinatorcommunities
AT elenastashenko naturalhabitatpartiallymitigatesnegativepesticideeffectsontropicalpollinatorcommunities
AT katjapoveda naturalhabitatpartiallymitigatesnegativepesticideeffectsontropicalpollinatorcommunities