Psichiatria e filosofia. Allittero ergo sum. Psicolatrie e filosofemi_psicolatrati e filosofischi

In the story of culture, Philosophy and Psychiatry have intercepted each other more frequently to emphasize methodological distinctions than to integrate their respective analyses into a coherent picture. A story of disagreements, of categorical closures followed by sudden and not always since...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Amodio, Paolo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it 2015-12-01
Series:S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scienzaefilosofia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/res697488_01-DOSSIER.pdf
_version_ 1811259782709903360
author Amodio, Paolo
author_facet Amodio, Paolo
author_sort Amodio, Paolo
collection DOAJ
description In the story of culture, Philosophy and Psychiatry have intercepted each other more frequently to emphasize methodological distinctions than to integrate their respective analyses into a coherent picture. A story of disagreements, of categorical closures followed by sudden and not always sincere concordance in the name of the opposing concepts of Universality and Medicine, one would say. Here we ask whether it is still possible to rebuilt a conceptual framework, a new chapter in this relationship, to imagine new discursive possibilities.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T18:36:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f473bd48cf44064aed8d5b277313a01
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2036-2927
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T18:36:45Z
publishDate 2015-12-01
publisher S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it
record_format Article
series S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it
spelling doaj.art-7f473bd48cf44064aed8d5b277313a012022-12-22T03:20:55ZengS&F_scienzaefilosofia.itS&F_scienzaefilosofia.it2036-29272015-12-0114813Psichiatria e filosofia. Allittero ergo sum. Psicolatrie e filosofemi_psicolatrati e filosofischiAmodio, Paolo0University of Naples - Federico IIIn the story of culture, Philosophy and Psychiatry have intercepted each other more frequently to emphasize methodological distinctions than to integrate their respective analyses into a coherent picture. A story of disagreements, of categorical closures followed by sudden and not always sincere concordance in the name of the opposing concepts of Universality and Medicine, one would say. Here we ask whether it is still possible to rebuilt a conceptual framework, a new chapter in this relationship, to imagine new discursive possibilities.http://www.scienzaefilosofia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/res697488_01-DOSSIER.pdfphilosophypsychiatrymedicine
spellingShingle Amodio, Paolo
Psichiatria e filosofia. Allittero ergo sum. Psicolatrie e filosofemi_psicolatrati e filosofischi
S&F_scienzaefilosofia.it
philosophy
psychiatry
medicine
title Psichiatria e filosofia. Allittero ergo sum. Psicolatrie e filosofemi_psicolatrati e filosofischi
title_full Psichiatria e filosofia. Allittero ergo sum. Psicolatrie e filosofemi_psicolatrati e filosofischi
title_fullStr Psichiatria e filosofia. Allittero ergo sum. Psicolatrie e filosofemi_psicolatrati e filosofischi
title_full_unstemmed Psichiatria e filosofia. Allittero ergo sum. Psicolatrie e filosofemi_psicolatrati e filosofischi
title_short Psichiatria e filosofia. Allittero ergo sum. Psicolatrie e filosofemi_psicolatrati e filosofischi
title_sort psichiatria e filosofia allittero ergo sum psicolatrie e filosofemi psicolatrati e filosofischi
topic philosophy
psychiatry
medicine
url http://www.scienzaefilosofia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/res697488_01-DOSSIER.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT amodiopaolo psichiatriaefilosofiaallitteroergosumpsicolatrieefilosofemipsicolatratiefilosofischi