Ultrasound-guided Placement of Permanent Hemodialysis Catheters Compared to the Traditional Blind Method

Background: Central venous hemodialysis catheters are one of the most common vascular accesses for patients suffering from end-stage kidney disease. The application of ultrasound-guided placement of permanent hemodialysis catheters is highly recommended by the new guidelines because of its advantage...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arash Mohammadi Tofigh, Farbod Emami Yeganeh, Elham Mirzaian, Behzad Nemati Honar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2019-10-01
Series:International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/ijmtfm/article/view/25389/pdf
_version_ 1818934550292594688
author Arash Mohammadi Tofigh
Farbod Emami Yeganeh
Elham Mirzaian
Behzad Nemati Honar
author_facet Arash Mohammadi Tofigh
Farbod Emami Yeganeh
Elham Mirzaian
Behzad Nemati Honar
author_sort Arash Mohammadi Tofigh
collection DOAJ
description Background: Central venous hemodialysis catheters are one of the most common vascular accesses for patients suffering from end-stage kidney disease. The application of ultrasound-guided placement of permanent hemodialysis catheters is highly recommended by the new guidelines because of its advantages over the traditional blind methods. Methods: In this prospective study, the samples comprised patients (N=80) referred to a vascular surgery clinic by their nephrologist or elective vascular surgery consultations and asking for the placement of permanent hemodialysis catheters in Imam Hossain Hospital (A referral hospital complex center in, Tehran, Iran) during 2014 to 2015. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (n=40); one of the groups underwent the placement of catheters with the guidance of Doppler ultrasound and the other with the traditional blind method. Then, the data were analyzed by SPSS V. 21 software. Results: There was statistically significant fewer attempts for successful placement (Z= -2.725, P=0.006), less insertion failure (Chi-Square=9.600, P=0.002), fewer failures with the first attempt (Chi-square=9.600, P=0.002), and less total placement time (t=1.379, df=69.549, P=0.172) in the sonography-guided group compared to the blind method. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in venous cannulation time and complications such as pneumothorax, neck hematoma, and carotid puncture between the two groups. Moreover, the patients had significantly greater satisfaction with the sonography-guided method (Z=-4.306, P=0.0001). Conclusion: According to this study, it might be beneficial to use ultrasound as the first method of permanent hemodialysis catheters insertion and patients would be more satisfied with this approach as well. In addition, learning the blind method is recommended to the practitioners because of the possibility of lacking ultrasound in an emergency.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T05:06:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f4e0c88561e468eb5863bf6d9bf91ec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-8762
2251-8770
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T05:06:03Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine
spelling doaj.art-7f4e0c88561e468eb5863bf6d9bf91ec2022-12-21T19:52:24ZengShaheed Beheshti University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine2251-87622251-87702019-10-019421322010.32598/ijmtfm.v9i4.25389Ultrasound-guided Placement of Permanent Hemodialysis Catheters Compared to the Traditional Blind MethodArash Mohammadi Tofigh0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3712-0650Farbod Emami Yeganeh1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4626-5851Elham Mirzaian2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5408-3911Behzad Nemati Honar3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4249-8479Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Imam Hossein Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Background: Central venous hemodialysis catheters are one of the most common vascular accesses for patients suffering from end-stage kidney disease. The application of ultrasound-guided placement of permanent hemodialysis catheters is highly recommended by the new guidelines because of its advantages over the traditional blind methods. Methods: In this prospective study, the samples comprised patients (N=80) referred to a vascular surgery clinic by their nephrologist or elective vascular surgery consultations and asking for the placement of permanent hemodialysis catheters in Imam Hossain Hospital (A referral hospital complex center in, Tehran, Iran) during 2014 to 2015. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (n=40); one of the groups underwent the placement of catheters with the guidance of Doppler ultrasound and the other with the traditional blind method. Then, the data were analyzed by SPSS V. 21 software. Results: There was statistically significant fewer attempts for successful placement (Z= -2.725, P=0.006), less insertion failure (Chi-Square=9.600, P=0.002), fewer failures with the first attempt (Chi-square=9.600, P=0.002), and less total placement time (t=1.379, df=69.549, P=0.172) in the sonography-guided group compared to the blind method. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in venous cannulation time and complications such as pneumothorax, neck hematoma, and carotid puncture between the two groups. Moreover, the patients had significantly greater satisfaction with the sonography-guided method (Z=-4.306, P=0.0001). Conclusion: According to this study, it might be beneficial to use ultrasound as the first method of permanent hemodialysis catheters insertion and patients would be more satisfied with this approach as well. In addition, learning the blind method is recommended to the practitioners because of the possibility of lacking ultrasound in an emergency.https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/ijmtfm/article/view/25389/pdfdialysiscathetersanatomic landmarksultrasonographydoppler
spellingShingle Arash Mohammadi Tofigh
Farbod Emami Yeganeh
Elham Mirzaian
Behzad Nemati Honar
Ultrasound-guided Placement of Permanent Hemodialysis Catheters Compared to the Traditional Blind Method
International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine
dialysis
catheters
anatomic landmarks
ultrasonography
doppler
title Ultrasound-guided Placement of Permanent Hemodialysis Catheters Compared to the Traditional Blind Method
title_full Ultrasound-guided Placement of Permanent Hemodialysis Catheters Compared to the Traditional Blind Method
title_fullStr Ultrasound-guided Placement of Permanent Hemodialysis Catheters Compared to the Traditional Blind Method
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-guided Placement of Permanent Hemodialysis Catheters Compared to the Traditional Blind Method
title_short Ultrasound-guided Placement of Permanent Hemodialysis Catheters Compared to the Traditional Blind Method
title_sort ultrasound guided placement of permanent hemodialysis catheters compared to the traditional blind method
topic dialysis
catheters
anatomic landmarks
ultrasonography
doppler
url https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/ijmtfm/article/view/25389/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT arashmohammaditofigh ultrasoundguidedplacementofpermanenthemodialysiscatheterscomparedtothetraditionalblindmethod
AT farbodemamiyeganeh ultrasoundguidedplacementofpermanenthemodialysiscatheterscomparedtothetraditionalblindmethod
AT elhammirzaian ultrasoundguidedplacementofpermanenthemodialysiscatheterscomparedtothetraditionalblindmethod
AT behzadnematihonar ultrasoundguidedplacementofpermanenthemodialysiscatheterscomparedtothetraditionalblindmethod