Validation of RANS models and Large Eddy simulation for predicting crossflow induced by mixing vanes in rod bundle

The crossflow is the key phenomenon in turbulent flow inside rod bundles. In order to establish confidence on application of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate the crossflow in rod bundles, three Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) models i.e. the realizable k-ε model, the k-ω SST mod...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabian Wiltschko, Wenhai Qu, Jinbiao Xiong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-11-01
Series:Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573321003090
_version_ 1818693496253448192
author Fabian Wiltschko
Wenhai Qu
Jinbiao Xiong
author_facet Fabian Wiltschko
Wenhai Qu
Jinbiao Xiong
author_sort Fabian Wiltschko
collection DOAJ
description The crossflow is the key phenomenon in turbulent flow inside rod bundles. In order to establish confidence on application of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate the crossflow in rod bundles, three Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) models i.e. the realizable k-ε model, the k-ω SST model and the Reynolds stress model (RSM), and the Large Eddy simulations (LES) with the Wall-Adapting Local Eddy-viscosity (WALE) model are validated based on the Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) flow measurement experiment in a 5 × 5 rod bundle. In order to investigate effects of periodic boundary condition in the gap, the numerical results obtained with four inner subchannels are compared with that obtained with the whole 5 × 5 rod bundle. The results show that periodic boundaries in the gaps produce strong errors far downstream of the spacer grid, and therefore the full 5 × 5 rod bundle should be simulated. Furthermore, it can be concluded, that the realizable k-ε model can only provide reasonable results very close to the spacer grid, while the other investigated models are in good agreement with the experimental data in the whole downstream flow in the rod bundle. The LES approach shows superiority to the RANS models.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T13:14:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f4e34c423fb413a9b57800bf778d147
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1738-5733
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T13:14:36Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Nuclear Engineering and Technology
spelling doaj.art-7f4e34c423fb413a9b57800bf778d1472022-12-21T21:47:01ZengElsevierNuclear Engineering and Technology1738-57332021-11-01531136253634Validation of RANS models and Large Eddy simulation for predicting crossflow induced by mixing vanes in rod bundleFabian Wiltschko0Wenhai Qu1Jinbiao Xiong2School of Nuclear Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240, Shanghai, Minhang District, ChinaSchool of Nuclear Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240, Shanghai, Minhang District, ChinaCorresponding author.; School of Nuclear Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240, Shanghai, Minhang District, ChinaThe crossflow is the key phenomenon in turbulent flow inside rod bundles. In order to establish confidence on application of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate the crossflow in rod bundles, three Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) models i.e. the realizable k-ε model, the k-ω SST model and the Reynolds stress model (RSM), and the Large Eddy simulations (LES) with the Wall-Adapting Local Eddy-viscosity (WALE) model are validated based on the Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) flow measurement experiment in a 5 × 5 rod bundle. In order to investigate effects of periodic boundary condition in the gap, the numerical results obtained with four inner subchannels are compared with that obtained with the whole 5 × 5 rod bundle. The results show that periodic boundaries in the gaps produce strong errors far downstream of the spacer grid, and therefore the full 5 × 5 rod bundle should be simulated. Furthermore, it can be concluded, that the realizable k-ε model can only provide reasonable results very close to the spacer grid, while the other investigated models are in good agreement with the experimental data in the whole downstream flow in the rod bundle. The LES approach shows superiority to the RANS models.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573321003090Rod bundleSpacer gridMixing vanesLarge eddy simulationRANSBenchmark
spellingShingle Fabian Wiltschko
Wenhai Qu
Jinbiao Xiong
Validation of RANS models and Large Eddy simulation for predicting crossflow induced by mixing vanes in rod bundle
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Rod bundle
Spacer grid
Mixing vanes
Large eddy simulation
RANS
Benchmark
title Validation of RANS models and Large Eddy simulation for predicting crossflow induced by mixing vanes in rod bundle
title_full Validation of RANS models and Large Eddy simulation for predicting crossflow induced by mixing vanes in rod bundle
title_fullStr Validation of RANS models and Large Eddy simulation for predicting crossflow induced by mixing vanes in rod bundle
title_full_unstemmed Validation of RANS models and Large Eddy simulation for predicting crossflow induced by mixing vanes in rod bundle
title_short Validation of RANS models and Large Eddy simulation for predicting crossflow induced by mixing vanes in rod bundle
title_sort validation of rans models and large eddy simulation for predicting crossflow induced by mixing vanes in rod bundle
topic Rod bundle
Spacer grid
Mixing vanes
Large eddy simulation
RANS
Benchmark
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573321003090
work_keys_str_mv AT fabianwiltschko validationofransmodelsandlargeeddysimulationforpredictingcrossflowinducedbymixingvanesinrodbundle
AT wenhaiqu validationofransmodelsandlargeeddysimulationforpredictingcrossflowinducedbymixingvanesinrodbundle
AT jinbiaoxiong validationofransmodelsandlargeeddysimulationforpredictingcrossflowinducedbymixingvanesinrodbundle