Telemedicine Effectiveness in the First Elective Orthopedic Care Compared to a Standard Face-to-face Visit

Abstract Objective The study aimed to compare whether the diagnoses of orthopedic diseases at telemedicine (TM) consultations are the same as those established at face-to-face visits. Method Primary, observational, prospective, analytical study, with subjects from the local municipal network who w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jair Moreira Dias Júnior, Adriano Fernando Mendes Júnior
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia 2023-10-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162023000400580&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1797327703809982464
author Jair Moreira Dias Júnior
Adriano Fernando Mendes Júnior
author_facet Jair Moreira Dias Júnior
Adriano Fernando Mendes Júnior
author_sort Jair Moreira Dias Júnior
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective The study aimed to compare whether the diagnoses of orthopedic diseases at telemedicine (TM) consultations are the same as those established at face-to-face visits. Method Primary, observational, prospective, analytical study, with subjects from the local municipal network who were referred to the orthopedics outpatient clinic from May to June 2021. Subjects underwent two assessments: a telemedicine (TM) consultation and a face-to-face (FF) visit. Two different physicians attended to the patients and established a diagnosis. The physician performing the FF visit was not aware of the previous diagnoses. We compared the diagnoses obtained at both modalities to assess the degree of similarity. In addition, we determined the time required for consultations and the degree of satisfaction of the physicians. Results We evaluated 43 patients and seven physicians, totaling 44 TM and 43 FF visits. The diagnostic similarity index was 81.4%. TM consultations were shorter (mean time, 4.8 minutes) than FF visits. Physicians were less satisfied with TM in the four criteria evaluated (respective scores of 79.1, 23.3, 46.6, and 37.2). Conclusion TM consultations have a diagnoses agreement higher than 80% compared with FF visits. On the other hand, TM consultations were faster, and physicians were less satisfied with them in comparison with FF visits.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T06:42:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f51e54ce7c24c789ddd27be308eb063
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1982-4378
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T06:42:18Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
spelling doaj.art-7f51e54ce7c24c789ddd27be308eb0632024-02-03T08:34:51ZengSociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e TraumatologiaRevista Brasileira de Ortopedia1982-43782023-10-0158458058510.1055/s-0042-1756324Telemedicine Effectiveness in the First Elective Orthopedic Care Compared to a Standard Face-to-face VisitJair Moreira Dias Júniorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4848-1555Adriano Fernando Mendes Júniorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1877-8155Abstract Objective The study aimed to compare whether the diagnoses of orthopedic diseases at telemedicine (TM) consultations are the same as those established at face-to-face visits. Method Primary, observational, prospective, analytical study, with subjects from the local municipal network who were referred to the orthopedics outpatient clinic from May to June 2021. Subjects underwent two assessments: a telemedicine (TM) consultation and a face-to-face (FF) visit. Two different physicians attended to the patients and established a diagnosis. The physician performing the FF visit was not aware of the previous diagnoses. We compared the diagnoses obtained at both modalities to assess the degree of similarity. In addition, we determined the time required for consultations and the degree of satisfaction of the physicians. Results We evaluated 43 patients and seven physicians, totaling 44 TM and 43 FF visits. The diagnostic similarity index was 81.4%. TM consultations were shorter (mean time, 4.8 minutes) than FF visits. Physicians were less satisfied with TM in the four criteria evaluated (respective scores of 79.1, 23.3, 46.6, and 37.2). Conclusion TM consultations have a diagnoses agreement higher than 80% compared with FF visits. On the other hand, TM consultations were faster, and physicians were less satisfied with them in comparison with FF visits.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162023000400580&lng=en&tlng=entreatment adherence and compliancediagnosisorthopedicsteleconsultation
spellingShingle Jair Moreira Dias Júnior
Adriano Fernando Mendes Júnior
Telemedicine Effectiveness in the First Elective Orthopedic Care Compared to a Standard Face-to-face Visit
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
treatment adherence and compliance
diagnosis
orthopedics
teleconsultation
title Telemedicine Effectiveness in the First Elective Orthopedic Care Compared to a Standard Face-to-face Visit
title_full Telemedicine Effectiveness in the First Elective Orthopedic Care Compared to a Standard Face-to-face Visit
title_fullStr Telemedicine Effectiveness in the First Elective Orthopedic Care Compared to a Standard Face-to-face Visit
title_full_unstemmed Telemedicine Effectiveness in the First Elective Orthopedic Care Compared to a Standard Face-to-face Visit
title_short Telemedicine Effectiveness in the First Elective Orthopedic Care Compared to a Standard Face-to-face Visit
title_sort telemedicine effectiveness in the first elective orthopedic care compared to a standard face to face visit
topic treatment adherence and compliance
diagnosis
orthopedics
teleconsultation
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-36162023000400580&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT jairmoreiradiasjunior telemedicineeffectivenessinthefirstelectiveorthopediccarecomparedtoastandardfacetofacevisit
AT adrianofernandomendesjunior telemedicineeffectivenessinthefirstelectiveorthopediccarecomparedtoastandardfacetofacevisit