Periodontal Problems Following Surgical Extraction of Impacted

Introduction:There are conflicting reports on the effects of surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars on the periodontium of the adjacent teeth. The aim of this study was to compare the condition of the periodontium six months after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars with bas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Majid Eshghpour, Reza Shahakbari, Amirhossein Nejat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2013-03-01
Series:Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/?_action=showPDF&article=499&_ob=659112acc3e66fb06a7e5092ed9a61d9&fileName=full_text.pdf
_version_ 1811308505438617600
author Majid Eshghpour
Reza Shahakbari
Amirhossein Nejat
author_facet Majid Eshghpour
Reza Shahakbari
Amirhossein Nejat
author_sort Majid Eshghpour
collection DOAJ
description Introduction:There are conflicting reports on the effects of surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars on the periodontium of the adjacent teeth. The aim of this study was to compare the condition of the periodontium six months after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars with baseline values. Methods: Fifty patients with mesioangular impacted mandibular third molarsparticipated in this study. Probing depth (PD), Leo and Sillness' gingival index (GI), and clinical attachment level (CAL) in distobuccal, mid-distal, and distolingual surfaces of second molar teeth were assessed before surgical extraction of the third molars and 6 months later. To evaluate the changes in alveolar bone height (BH), two parallel PA radiographs obtained at the baseline and follow-up session. Data was analyzed with SPSS 11.0 software atthe confidence interval of 95%. Results: Thirty-eight females and 12 males participated in this study. Twenty-eight(56%) of impacted molar teeth were in the right side and 22 (44%) were in the left side. Baseline values of PD, CAL, and GI at three points of the distal surface of the mandibular second molar tooth had no significant differences with follow-up values (P-value> 0.05). According to the radiographs, baseline BH also had insignificant difference with follow-up height (P-value>0.05). Conclusion: Surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar does not affect periodontium after 6 months.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T09:24:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f5bd5a80bba4eddb400546e13775431
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2322-4150
2252-0317
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T09:24:29Z
publishDate 2013-03-01
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques
spelling doaj.art-7f5bd5a80bba4eddb400546e137754312022-12-22T02:52:30ZengMashhad University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Materials and Techniques2322-41502252-03172013-03-01225962Periodontal Problems Following Surgical Extraction of ImpactedMajid EshghpourReza ShahakbariAmirhossein NejatIntroduction:There are conflicting reports on the effects of surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars on the periodontium of the adjacent teeth. The aim of this study was to compare the condition of the periodontium six months after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars with baseline values. Methods: Fifty patients with mesioangular impacted mandibular third molarsparticipated in this study. Probing depth (PD), Leo and Sillness' gingival index (GI), and clinical attachment level (CAL) in distobuccal, mid-distal, and distolingual surfaces of second molar teeth were assessed before surgical extraction of the third molars and 6 months later. To evaluate the changes in alveolar bone height (BH), two parallel PA radiographs obtained at the baseline and follow-up session. Data was analyzed with SPSS 11.0 software atthe confidence interval of 95%. Results: Thirty-eight females and 12 males participated in this study. Twenty-eight(56%) of impacted molar teeth were in the right side and 22 (44%) were in the left side. Baseline values of PD, CAL, and GI at three points of the distal surface of the mandibular second molar tooth had no significant differences with follow-up values (P-value> 0.05). According to the radiographs, baseline BH also had insignificant difference with follow-up height (P-value>0.05). Conclusion: Surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar does not affect periodontium after 6 months.http://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/?_action=showPDF&article=499&_ob=659112acc3e66fb06a7e5092ed9a61d9&fileName=full_text.pdfImpacted toothperiodontal statussecond molar tooth.
spellingShingle Majid Eshghpour
Reza Shahakbari
Amirhossein Nejat
Periodontal Problems Following Surgical Extraction of Impacted
Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques
Impacted tooth
periodontal status
second molar tooth.
title Periodontal Problems Following Surgical Extraction of Impacted
title_full Periodontal Problems Following Surgical Extraction of Impacted
title_fullStr Periodontal Problems Following Surgical Extraction of Impacted
title_full_unstemmed Periodontal Problems Following Surgical Extraction of Impacted
title_short Periodontal Problems Following Surgical Extraction of Impacted
title_sort periodontal problems following surgical extraction of impacted
topic Impacted tooth
periodontal status
second molar tooth.
url http://jdmt.mums.ac.ir/?_action=showPDF&article=499&_ob=659112acc3e66fb06a7e5092ed9a61d9&fileName=full_text.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT majideshghpour periodontalproblemsfollowingsurgicalextractionofimpacted
AT rezashahakbari periodontalproblemsfollowingsurgicalextractionofimpacted
AT amirhosseinnejat periodontalproblemsfollowingsurgicalextractionofimpacted