Non-Standard Electrode Placement Strategies for ECG Signal Acquisition

Background: Wearable technologies for monitoring cardiovascular parameters, including electrocardiography (ECG) and impedance cardiography (ICG), propose a challenging research subject. The expectancy for wearable devices to be unobtrusive and miniaturized sets a goal to develop smarter devices and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Margus Metshein, Andrei Krivošei, Anar Abdullayev, Paul Annus, Olev Märtens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/23/9351
_version_ 1797462121555951616
author Margus Metshein
Andrei Krivošei
Anar Abdullayev
Paul Annus
Olev Märtens
author_facet Margus Metshein
Andrei Krivošei
Anar Abdullayev
Paul Annus
Olev Märtens
author_sort Margus Metshein
collection DOAJ
description Background: Wearable technologies for monitoring cardiovascular parameters, including electrocardiography (ECG) and impedance cardiography (ICG), propose a challenging research subject. The expectancy for wearable devices to be unobtrusive and miniaturized sets a goal to develop smarter devices and better methods for signal acquisition, processing, and decision-making. Methods: In this work, non-standard electrode placement configurations (EPC) on the thoracic area and single arm were experimented for ECG signal acquisition. The locations were selected for joint acquisition of ECG and ICG, targeted to suitability for integrating into wearable devices. The methodology for comparing the detected signals of ECG was developed, presented, and applied to determine the R, S, and T waves and RR interval. An algorithm was proposed to distinguish the R waves in the case of large T waves. Results: Results show the feasibility of using non-standard EPCs, manifesting in recognizable signal waveforms with reasonable quality for post-processing. A considerably lower median sensitivity of R wave was verified (27.3%) compared with T wave (49%) and S wave (44.9%) throughout the used data. The proposed algorithm for distinguishing R wave from large T wave shows satisfactory results. Conclusions: The most suitable non-standard locations for ECG monitoring in conjunction with ICG were determined and proposed.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T17:32:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f5f761dfe344cf6aa13bd422a49f8c9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T17:32:00Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-7f5f761dfe344cf6aa13bd422a49f8c92023-11-24T12:12:46ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202022-12-012223935110.3390/s22239351Non-Standard Electrode Placement Strategies for ECG Signal AcquisitionMargus Metshein0Andrei Krivošei1Anar Abdullayev2Paul Annus3Olev Märtens4Thomas Johann Seebeck Department of Electronics, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, EstoniaThomas Johann Seebeck Department of Electronics, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, EstoniaThomas Johann Seebeck Department of Electronics, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, EstoniaThomas Johann Seebeck Department of Electronics, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, EstoniaThomas Johann Seebeck Department of Electronics, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, EstoniaBackground: Wearable technologies for monitoring cardiovascular parameters, including electrocardiography (ECG) and impedance cardiography (ICG), propose a challenging research subject. The expectancy for wearable devices to be unobtrusive and miniaturized sets a goal to develop smarter devices and better methods for signal acquisition, processing, and decision-making. Methods: In this work, non-standard electrode placement configurations (EPC) on the thoracic area and single arm were experimented for ECG signal acquisition. The locations were selected for joint acquisition of ECG and ICG, targeted to suitability for integrating into wearable devices. The methodology for comparing the detected signals of ECG was developed, presented, and applied to determine the R, S, and T waves and RR interval. An algorithm was proposed to distinguish the R waves in the case of large T waves. Results: Results show the feasibility of using non-standard EPCs, manifesting in recognizable signal waveforms with reasonable quality for post-processing. A considerably lower median sensitivity of R wave was verified (27.3%) compared with T wave (49%) and S wave (44.9%) throughout the used data. The proposed algorithm for distinguishing R wave from large T wave shows satisfactory results. Conclusions: The most suitable non-standard locations for ECG monitoring in conjunction with ICG were determined and proposed.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/23/9351electrocardiographyelectrode placement strategyimpedance cardiographyQRS complexRR intervalsignal quality assessment
spellingShingle Margus Metshein
Andrei Krivošei
Anar Abdullayev
Paul Annus
Olev Märtens
Non-Standard Electrode Placement Strategies for ECG Signal Acquisition
Sensors
electrocardiography
electrode placement strategy
impedance cardiography
QRS complex
RR interval
signal quality assessment
title Non-Standard Electrode Placement Strategies for ECG Signal Acquisition
title_full Non-Standard Electrode Placement Strategies for ECG Signal Acquisition
title_fullStr Non-Standard Electrode Placement Strategies for ECG Signal Acquisition
title_full_unstemmed Non-Standard Electrode Placement Strategies for ECG Signal Acquisition
title_short Non-Standard Electrode Placement Strategies for ECG Signal Acquisition
title_sort non standard electrode placement strategies for ecg signal acquisition
topic electrocardiography
electrode placement strategy
impedance cardiography
QRS complex
RR interval
signal quality assessment
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/23/9351
work_keys_str_mv AT margusmetshein nonstandardelectrodeplacementstrategiesforecgsignalacquisition
AT andreikrivosei nonstandardelectrodeplacementstrategiesforecgsignalacquisition
AT anarabdullayev nonstandardelectrodeplacementstrategiesforecgsignalacquisition
AT paulannus nonstandardelectrodeplacementstrategiesforecgsignalacquisition
AT olevmartens nonstandardelectrodeplacementstrategiesforecgsignalacquisition