Adhesion of Candida Albicans and Candida Parapsilosis to Different Restorative Materials
Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the susceptibility of seven different restorative materials (three conventional composite resins, two bulk-fill composite resins, one giomer, and one high viscosity glass ionomer material) to adhere Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis.Material and...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cumhuriyet University
2019-12-01
|
| Series: | Cumhuriyet Dental Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/904517 |
| _version_ | 1797699287205806080 |
|---|---|
| author | Soley Arslan Hacer Balkaya Nazire Nurdan Çakır Ayşe Nedret Koç Burhanettin Avcı |
| author_facet | Soley Arslan Hacer Balkaya Nazire Nurdan Çakır Ayşe Nedret Koç Burhanettin Avcı |
| author_sort | Soley Arslan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the susceptibility
of seven different restorative materials (three conventional composite resins,
two bulk-fill composite resins, one giomer, and one high viscosity glass
ionomer material) to adhere Candida
albicans and Candida parapsilosis.Material and methods: In this
study, thirty cylindrical specimens of each material were made according to
instructions of the manufacturers. The surface roughness of the specimens was
assessed using a profilometer. Thereafter, the specimens were incubated with a
reference strain of Candida albicans (ATCC
64548) and Candida parapsilosis (ATCC
22019). The proliferated colonies counted as CFU/ml. One-way analysis of
variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the surface roughness and the adhesion
value of the materials. Tukey’s post-hoc test was used for subsequent pairwise
comparisons.Results: There was a statistically significant difference
between the groups in terms of the surface roughness of the materials (p<0.05). The high viscosity glass
ionomer material exhibited significantly higher surface roughness values while X-trafil
(a bulkfill composite resin) had the lowest surface roughness values. Also, there
was a significant difference between Candida
adhesion values of the materials (p<0.05).
Conclusion: There was no significant relationship between surface
roughness and adhesion of Candida
albicans and Candida parapsilosis.
Involvement was seen more for Candida albicans compared to Candida
parapsilosis in all restorative materials. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T04:06:53Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7f6b830fefed4ad0b71f775ebaaeb33a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1302-5805 2146-2852 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T04:06:53Z |
| publishDate | 2019-12-01 |
| publisher | Cumhuriyet University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cumhuriyet Dental Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-7f6b830fefed4ad0b71f775ebaaeb33a2023-09-03T11:17:24ZengCumhuriyet UniversityCumhuriyet Dental Journal1302-58052146-28522019-12-0122446146810.7126/cumudj.6447502057Adhesion of Candida Albicans and Candida Parapsilosis to Different Restorative MaterialsSoley ArslanHacer BalkayaNazire Nurdan ÇakırAyşe Nedret KoçBurhanettin AvcıObjective: The aim of this study is to compare the susceptibility of seven different restorative materials (three conventional composite resins, two bulk-fill composite resins, one giomer, and one high viscosity glass ionomer material) to adhere Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis.Material and methods: In this study, thirty cylindrical specimens of each material were made according to instructions of the manufacturers. The surface roughness of the specimens was assessed using a profilometer. Thereafter, the specimens were incubated with a reference strain of Candida albicans (ATCC 64548) and Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019). The proliferated colonies counted as CFU/ml. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the surface roughness and the adhesion value of the materials. Tukey’s post-hoc test was used for subsequent pairwise comparisons.Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the surface roughness of the materials (p<0.05). The high viscosity glass ionomer material exhibited significantly higher surface roughness values while X-trafil (a bulkfill composite resin) had the lowest surface roughness values. Also, there was a significant difference between Candida adhesion values of the materials (p<0.05). Conclusion: There was no significant relationship between surface roughness and adhesion of Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis. Involvement was seen more for Candida albicans compared to Candida parapsilosis in all restorative materials.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/904517bulk-fill compositecandida adhesionrestorative materialsurface roughness |
| spellingShingle | Soley Arslan Hacer Balkaya Nazire Nurdan Çakır Ayşe Nedret Koç Burhanettin Avcı Adhesion of Candida Albicans and Candida Parapsilosis to Different Restorative Materials Cumhuriyet Dental Journal bulk-fill composite candida adhesion restorative material surface roughness |
| title | Adhesion of Candida Albicans and Candida Parapsilosis to Different Restorative Materials |
| title_full | Adhesion of Candida Albicans and Candida Parapsilosis to Different Restorative Materials |
| title_fullStr | Adhesion of Candida Albicans and Candida Parapsilosis to Different Restorative Materials |
| title_full_unstemmed | Adhesion of Candida Albicans and Candida Parapsilosis to Different Restorative Materials |
| title_short | Adhesion of Candida Albicans and Candida Parapsilosis to Different Restorative Materials |
| title_sort | adhesion of candida albicans and candida parapsilosis to different restorative materials |
| topic | bulk-fill composite candida adhesion restorative material surface roughness |
| url | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/904517 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT soleyarslan adhesionofcandidaalbicansandcandidaparapsilosistodifferentrestorativematerials AT hacerbalkaya adhesionofcandidaalbicansandcandidaparapsilosistodifferentrestorativematerials AT nazirenurdancakır adhesionofcandidaalbicansandcandidaparapsilosistodifferentrestorativematerials AT aysenedretkoc adhesionofcandidaalbicansandcandidaparapsilosistodifferentrestorativematerials AT burhanettinavcı adhesionofcandidaalbicansandcandidaparapsilosistodifferentrestorativematerials |