Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice,

Inclusion and exclusion strategies for allocation of scarce goods involve different processes. The conditions under which one strategy is chosen in favor of the other, however, have not been fully explicated. In the present study, decision makers chose a single strategy after reading through descrip...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John D. Jasper, Daniel Ansted
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2008-06-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/7719/jdm7719.pdf
_version_ 1797725819349499904
author John D. Jasper
Daniel Ansted
author_facet John D. Jasper
Daniel Ansted
author_sort John D. Jasper
collection DOAJ
description Inclusion and exclusion strategies for allocation of scarce goods involve different processes. The conditions under which one strategy is chosen in favor of the other, however, have not been fully explicated. In the present study, decision makers chose a single strategy after reading through descriptions of 16 potential organ recipients; they then narrowed the list of transplant candidates. Most liberals chose to use exclusion under conditions of abundance and inclusion under scarcity. In contrast, conservatives preferred an inclusion strategy under abundance and exclusion (though not significantly) under scarcity. Theoretical implications as well as ongoing work in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice, political ideology, and distributive justice are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:36:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f79a98791e14abdb875654a0376c2dc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:36:42Z
publishDate 2008-06-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-7f79a98791e14abdb875654a0376c2dc2023-09-02T08:37:18ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752008-06-013NA417424Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice,John D. JasperDaniel AnstedInclusion and exclusion strategies for allocation of scarce goods involve different processes. The conditions under which one strategy is chosen in favor of the other, however, have not been fully explicated. In the present study, decision makers chose a single strategy after reading through descriptions of 16 potential organ recipients; they then narrowed the list of transplant candidates. Most liberals chose to use exclusion under conditions of abundance and inclusion under scarcity. In contrast, conservatives preferred an inclusion strategy under abundance and exclusion (though not significantly) under scarcity. Theoretical implications as well as ongoing work in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice, political ideology, and distributive justice are discussed.http://journal.sjdm.org/7719/jdm7719.pdfinclusion-exclusion processesindividual differencesdecision makingpolitical orientationdistributive justiceresourceallocation.
spellingShingle John D. Jasper
Daniel Ansted
Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice,
Judgment and Decision Making
inclusion-exclusion processes
individual differences
decision making
political orientation
distributive justice
resourceallocation.
title Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice,
title_full Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice,
title_fullStr Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice,
title_full_unstemmed Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice,
title_short Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice,
title_sort liberal conservative differences in inclusion exclusion strategy choice
topic inclusion-exclusion processes
individual differences
decision making
political orientation
distributive justice
resourceallocation.
url http://journal.sjdm.org/7719/jdm7719.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT johndjasper liberalconservativedifferencesininclusionexclusionstrategychoice
AT danielansted liberalconservativedifferencesininclusionexclusionstrategychoice