Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice,
Inclusion and exclusion strategies for allocation of scarce goods involve different processes. The conditions under which one strategy is chosen in favor of the other, however, have not been fully explicated. In the present study, decision makers chose a single strategy after reading through descrip...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2008-06-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/7719/jdm7719.pdf |
_version_ | 1797725819349499904 |
---|---|
author | John D. Jasper Daniel Ansted |
author_facet | John D. Jasper Daniel Ansted |
author_sort | John D. Jasper |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Inclusion and exclusion strategies for allocation of scarce goods involve different processes. The conditions under which one strategy is chosen in favor of the other, however, have not been fully explicated. In the present study, decision makers chose a single strategy after reading through descriptions of 16 potential organ recipients; they then narrowed the list of transplant candidates. Most liberals chose to use exclusion under conditions of abundance and inclusion under scarcity. In contrast, conservatives preferred an inclusion strategy under abundance and exclusion (though not significantly) under scarcity. Theoretical implications as well as ongoing work in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice, political ideology, and distributive justice are discussed. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T10:36:42Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-7f79a98791e14abdb875654a0376c2dc |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1930-2975 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T10:36:42Z |
publishDate | 2008-06-01 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Judgment and Decision Making |
spelling | doaj.art-7f79a98791e14abdb875654a0376c2dc2023-09-02T08:37:18ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752008-06-013NA417424Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice,John D. JasperDaniel AnstedInclusion and exclusion strategies for allocation of scarce goods involve different processes. The conditions under which one strategy is chosen in favor of the other, however, have not been fully explicated. In the present study, decision makers chose a single strategy after reading through descriptions of 16 potential organ recipients; they then narrowed the list of transplant candidates. Most liberals chose to use exclusion under conditions of abundance and inclusion under scarcity. In contrast, conservatives preferred an inclusion strategy under abundance and exclusion (though not significantly) under scarcity. Theoretical implications as well as ongoing work in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice, political ideology, and distributive justice are discussed.http://journal.sjdm.org/7719/jdm7719.pdfinclusion-exclusion processesindividual differencesdecision makingpolitical orientationdistributive justiceresourceallocation. |
spellingShingle | John D. Jasper Daniel Ansted Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice, Judgment and Decision Making inclusion-exclusion processes individual differences decision making political orientation distributive justice resourceallocation. |
title | Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice, |
title_full | Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice, |
title_fullStr | Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice, |
title_full_unstemmed | Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice, |
title_short | Liberal-conservative differences in inclusion-exclusion strategy choice, |
title_sort | liberal conservative differences in inclusion exclusion strategy choice |
topic | inclusion-exclusion processes individual differences decision making political orientation distributive justice resourceallocation. |
url | http://journal.sjdm.org/7719/jdm7719.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johndjasper liberalconservativedifferencesininclusionexclusionstrategychoice AT danielansted liberalconservativedifferencesininclusionexclusionstrategychoice |