Comparison of video and direct observation methods for measuring oral behaviour in veal calves

Measuring behaviour, especially oral behaviour, has always been a debated issue: therefore the aim of this paper is to closely examine the study of oral behaviour in calves and the approaching methodology. Behavioural observations were conducted by two media (direct observations by check sheets and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marina Verga, Elisabetta Canali, Silvana Mattiello, Valentina Ferrante, Maria Vittoria Tosi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2010-01-01
Series:Italian Journal of Animal Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/337
_version_ 1818450088562786304
author Marina Verga
Elisabetta Canali
Silvana Mattiello
Valentina Ferrante
Maria Vittoria Tosi
author_facet Marina Verga
Elisabetta Canali
Silvana Mattiello
Valentina Ferrante
Maria Vittoria Tosi
author_sort Marina Verga
collection DOAJ
description Measuring behaviour, especially oral behaviour, has always been a debated issue: therefore the aim of this paper is to closely examine the study of oral behaviour in calves and the approaching methodology. Behavioural observations were conducted by two media (direct observations by check sheets and indirect observations by videotapes recorded by cam- eras connected to a digital field switcher and a time-lapse video recorder) in order to compare data and assess the reli- ability and validity of the two methods in identifying some oral behavioural patterns in calves. The study was carried out on 54 Polish Friesian calves housed in group pens and in individual crates. The behaviour of the calves was investigated during the fattening period on the 2nd, 7th, 13th, 18th and 23rd week, one hour before and one hour after each of the two meals. Two experienced observers checked the behaviour of the calves, including oral behaviours on structures and buckets and oral stereotypies, by direct observations using a scan sampling every 2 min- utes. The calves' behaviour was also video recorded on the same days in which the direct observations were carried out and analysed by the same two observers. Percentages of time spent on each type of behaviour were calculated and anal- ysed by Chi-square test. Regardless of the housing system, the comparison between direct and indirect observations revealed significant differences in almost every behavioural category. Licking, biting and nibbling structures, nibbling and sucking the bucket, playing with the bucket and the teat, chewing and oral stereotypies were significantly higher in direct observations compared to indirect (P < 0.001), while inactivity was higher in video recorded observations (P < 0.001). In conclusion, regardless of the type of housing, our results revealed an objective difficulty in analysing videotapes with very detailed behavioural categories, like oral behaviours. Although video recording can certainly represent a useful and practical alternative to direct observations in many situations, the video recording system used in this study for investi- gating calves' oral behaviour, in spite of the use of multiple cameras, could not replace direct observations, probably due to the restricted field of view, the low depth of focus, the black and white vision, the lack of audio and the time-lapse feature.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T20:45:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f7ceeaa3f464f0796353439de8ed4a9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1594-4077
1828-051X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T20:45:45Z
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Italian Journal of Animal Science
spelling doaj.art-7f7ceeaa3f464f0796353439de8ed4a92022-12-21T22:48:02ZengTaylor & Francis GroupItalian Journal of Animal Science1594-40771828-051X2010-01-0151192810.4081/ijas.2006.19Comparison of video and direct observation methods for measuring oral behaviour in veal calvesMarina VergaElisabetta CanaliSilvana MattielloValentina FerranteMaria Vittoria TosiMeasuring behaviour, especially oral behaviour, has always been a debated issue: therefore the aim of this paper is to closely examine the study of oral behaviour in calves and the approaching methodology. Behavioural observations were conducted by two media (direct observations by check sheets and indirect observations by videotapes recorded by cam- eras connected to a digital field switcher and a time-lapse video recorder) in order to compare data and assess the reli- ability and validity of the two methods in identifying some oral behavioural patterns in calves. The study was carried out on 54 Polish Friesian calves housed in group pens and in individual crates. The behaviour of the calves was investigated during the fattening period on the 2nd, 7th, 13th, 18th and 23rd week, one hour before and one hour after each of the two meals. Two experienced observers checked the behaviour of the calves, including oral behaviours on structures and buckets and oral stereotypies, by direct observations using a scan sampling every 2 min- utes. The calves' behaviour was also video recorded on the same days in which the direct observations were carried out and analysed by the same two observers. Percentages of time spent on each type of behaviour were calculated and anal- ysed by Chi-square test. Regardless of the housing system, the comparison between direct and indirect observations revealed significant differences in almost every behavioural category. Licking, biting and nibbling structures, nibbling and sucking the bucket, playing with the bucket and the teat, chewing and oral stereotypies were significantly higher in direct observations compared to indirect (P < 0.001), while inactivity was higher in video recorded observations (P < 0.001). In conclusion, regardless of the type of housing, our results revealed an objective difficulty in analysing videotapes with very detailed behavioural categories, like oral behaviours. Although video recording can certainly represent a useful and practical alternative to direct observations in many situations, the video recording system used in this study for investi- gating calves' oral behaviour, in spite of the use of multiple cameras, could not replace direct observations, probably due to the restricted field of view, the low depth of focus, the black and white vision, the lack of audio and the time-lapse feature.http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/337Measuring behaviour, Methodology, Veal calves, Oral behaviours, Stereotypies
spellingShingle Marina Verga
Elisabetta Canali
Silvana Mattiello
Valentina Ferrante
Maria Vittoria Tosi
Comparison of video and direct observation methods for measuring oral behaviour in veal calves
Italian Journal of Animal Science
Measuring behaviour, Methodology, Veal calves, Oral behaviours, Stereotypies
title Comparison of video and direct observation methods for measuring oral behaviour in veal calves
title_full Comparison of video and direct observation methods for measuring oral behaviour in veal calves
title_fullStr Comparison of video and direct observation methods for measuring oral behaviour in veal calves
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of video and direct observation methods for measuring oral behaviour in veal calves
title_short Comparison of video and direct observation methods for measuring oral behaviour in veal calves
title_sort comparison of video and direct observation methods for measuring oral behaviour in veal calves
topic Measuring behaviour, Methodology, Veal calves, Oral behaviours, Stereotypies
url http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/337
work_keys_str_mv AT marinaverga comparisonofvideoanddirectobservationmethodsformeasuringoralbehaviourinvealcalves
AT elisabettacanali comparisonofvideoanddirectobservationmethodsformeasuringoralbehaviourinvealcalves
AT silvanamattiello comparisonofvideoanddirectobservationmethodsformeasuringoralbehaviourinvealcalves
AT valentinaferrante comparisonofvideoanddirectobservationmethodsformeasuringoralbehaviourinvealcalves
AT mariavittoriatosi comparisonofvideoanddirectobservationmethodsformeasuringoralbehaviourinvealcalves