A comprehensive analysis of clinical, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness outcomes of key treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Treatment options for men with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have variable efficacy, safety, and retreatment profiles, contributing to variations in patient quality of life and healthcare costs. This study examined the long-term cost...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bilal Chughtai, Sirikan Rojanasarot, Kurt Neeser, Dmitry Gultyaev, Shuai Fu, Samir K Bhattacharyya, Ahmad M El-Arabi, Ben J Cutone, Kevin T McVary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266824
_version_ 1811344503917772800
author Bilal Chughtai
Sirikan Rojanasarot
Kurt Neeser
Dmitry Gultyaev
Shuai Fu
Samir K Bhattacharyya
Ahmad M El-Arabi
Ben J Cutone
Kevin T McVary
author_facet Bilal Chughtai
Sirikan Rojanasarot
Kurt Neeser
Dmitry Gultyaev
Shuai Fu
Samir K Bhattacharyya
Ahmad M El-Arabi
Ben J Cutone
Kevin T McVary
author_sort Bilal Chughtai
collection DOAJ
description Treatment options for men with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have variable efficacy, safety, and retreatment profiles, contributing to variations in patient quality of life and healthcare costs. This study examined the long-term cost-effectiveness of generic combination therapy (CT), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT), photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of BPH. A systematic literature review was performed to identify clinical trials of CT, PUL, WVTT, PVP, and TURP that reported change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) for men with BPH and a prostate volume ≤80 cm3. A random-effects network meta-analysis was used to account for the differences in patient baseline clinical characteristics between trials. An Excel-based Markov model was developed with a cohort of males with a mean age of 63 and an average IPSS of 22 to assess the cost-effectiveness of these treatment options at 1 and 5 years from a US Medicare perspective. Procedural and adverse event (AE)-related costs were based on 2021 Medicare reimbursement rates. Total Medicare costs at 5 years were highest for PUL ($9,580), followed by generic CT ($8,223), TURP ($6,328), PVP ($6,152), and WVTT ($2,655). The total cost of PUL was driven by procedural ($7,258) and retreatment ($1,168) costs. At 5 years, CT and PUL were associated with fewer quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) than WVTT, PVP, and TURP. Compared to WVTT, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for both TURP and PVP were above a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY (TURP: $64,409/QALY; PVP: $87,483/QALY). This study provides long-term cost-effectiveness evidence for several common treatment options for men with BPH. WVTT is an effective and economically viable treatment in resource-constrained environments.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T19:49:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f7fd6e063534139b9b1180c23b00d36
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T19:49:17Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-7f7fd6e063534139b9b1180c23b00d362022-12-22T02:32:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01174e026682410.1371/journal.pone.0266824A comprehensive analysis of clinical, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness outcomes of key treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia.Bilal ChughtaiSirikan RojanasarotKurt NeeserDmitry GultyaevShuai FuSamir K BhattacharyyaAhmad M El-ArabiBen J CutoneKevin T McVaryTreatment options for men with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have variable efficacy, safety, and retreatment profiles, contributing to variations in patient quality of life and healthcare costs. This study examined the long-term cost-effectiveness of generic combination therapy (CT), prostatic urethral lift (PUL), water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT), photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of BPH. A systematic literature review was performed to identify clinical trials of CT, PUL, WVTT, PVP, and TURP that reported change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) for men with BPH and a prostate volume ≤80 cm3. A random-effects network meta-analysis was used to account for the differences in patient baseline clinical characteristics between trials. An Excel-based Markov model was developed with a cohort of males with a mean age of 63 and an average IPSS of 22 to assess the cost-effectiveness of these treatment options at 1 and 5 years from a US Medicare perspective. Procedural and adverse event (AE)-related costs were based on 2021 Medicare reimbursement rates. Total Medicare costs at 5 years were highest for PUL ($9,580), followed by generic CT ($8,223), TURP ($6,328), PVP ($6,152), and WVTT ($2,655). The total cost of PUL was driven by procedural ($7,258) and retreatment ($1,168) costs. At 5 years, CT and PUL were associated with fewer quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) than WVTT, PVP, and TURP. Compared to WVTT, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for both TURP and PVP were above a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY (TURP: $64,409/QALY; PVP: $87,483/QALY). This study provides long-term cost-effectiveness evidence for several common treatment options for men with BPH. WVTT is an effective and economically viable treatment in resource-constrained environments.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266824
spellingShingle Bilal Chughtai
Sirikan Rojanasarot
Kurt Neeser
Dmitry Gultyaev
Shuai Fu
Samir K Bhattacharyya
Ahmad M El-Arabi
Ben J Cutone
Kevin T McVary
A comprehensive analysis of clinical, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness outcomes of key treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
PLoS ONE
title A comprehensive analysis of clinical, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness outcomes of key treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
title_full A comprehensive analysis of clinical, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness outcomes of key treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
title_fullStr A comprehensive analysis of clinical, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness outcomes of key treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
title_full_unstemmed A comprehensive analysis of clinical, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness outcomes of key treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
title_short A comprehensive analysis of clinical, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness outcomes of key treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
title_sort comprehensive analysis of clinical quality of life and cost effectiveness outcomes of key treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266824
work_keys_str_mv AT bilalchughtai acomprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT sirikanrojanasarot acomprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT kurtneeser acomprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT dmitrygultyaev acomprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT shuaifu acomprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT samirkbhattacharyya acomprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT ahmadmelarabi acomprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT benjcutone acomprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT kevintmcvary acomprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT bilalchughtai comprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT sirikanrojanasarot comprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT kurtneeser comprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT dmitrygultyaev comprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT shuaifu comprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT samirkbhattacharyya comprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT ahmadmelarabi comprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT benjcutone comprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia
AT kevintmcvary comprehensiveanalysisofclinicalqualityoflifeandcosteffectivenessoutcomesofkeytreatmentoptionsforbenignprostatichyperplasia