RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCE

The validity of an accelerometric system (Myotest©) for assessing vertical jump height, vertical force and power, leg stiffness and reactivity index was examined. 20 healthy males performed 3ד5 hops in place”, 3ד1 squat jump” and 3× “1 countermovement jump” during 2 test-retest sessions. The varia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M.-A. Choukou, G. Laffaye, R. Taiar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Termedia Publishing House 2014-07-01
Series:Biology of Sport
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.termedia.pl/RELIABILITY-AND-VALIDITY-OF-AN-ACCELEROMETRIC-SYSTEM-FOR-ASSESSING-VERTICAL-JUMPING-PERFORMANCE,78,23205,1,1.html
_version_ 1818533402038501376
author M.-A. Choukou
G. Laffaye
R. Taiar
author_facet M.-A. Choukou
G. Laffaye
R. Taiar
author_sort M.-A. Choukou
collection DOAJ
description The validity of an accelerometric system (Myotest©) for assessing vertical jump height, vertical force and power, leg stiffness and reactivity index was examined. 20 healthy males performed 3ד5 hops in place”, 3ד1 squat jump” and 3× “1 countermovement jump” during 2 test-retest sessions. The variables were simultaneously assessed using an accelerometer and a force platform at a frequency of 0.5 and 1 kHz, respectively. Both reliability and validity of the accelerometric system were studied. No significant differences between test and retest data were found (p<0.05), showing a high level of reliability. Besides, moderate to high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (from 0.74 to 0.96) were obtained for all variables whereas weak to moderate ICCs (from 0.29 to 0.79) were obtained for force and power during the countermovement jump. With regards to validity, the difference between the two devices was not significant for 5 hops in place height (1.8 cm), force during squat (-1.4 N · kg-1) and countermovement (0.1 N · kg-1) jumps, leg stiffness (7.8 kN · m-1) and reactivity index (0.4). So, the measurements of these variables with this accelerometer are valid, which is not the case for the other variables. The main causes of non-validity for velocity, power and contact time assessment are temporal biases of the takeoff and touchdown moments detection.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T17:58:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7f8412d08b444e9e872ae0fbacaddb83
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0860-021X
2083-1862
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T17:58:13Z
publishDate 2014-07-01
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format Article
series Biology of Sport
spelling doaj.art-7f8412d08b444e9e872ae0fbacaddb832022-12-22T00:56:00ZengTermedia Publishing HouseBiology of Sport0860-021X2083-18622014-07-01311556210.5604/20831862.108673323205RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCEM.-A. ChoukouG. LaffayeR. TaiarThe validity of an accelerometric system (Myotest©) for assessing vertical jump height, vertical force and power, leg stiffness and reactivity index was examined. 20 healthy males performed 3ד5 hops in place”, 3ד1 squat jump” and 3× “1 countermovement jump” during 2 test-retest sessions. The variables were simultaneously assessed using an accelerometer and a force platform at a frequency of 0.5 and 1 kHz, respectively. Both reliability and validity of the accelerometric system were studied. No significant differences between test and retest data were found (p<0.05), showing a high level of reliability. Besides, moderate to high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (from 0.74 to 0.96) were obtained for all variables whereas weak to moderate ICCs (from 0.29 to 0.79) were obtained for force and power during the countermovement jump. With regards to validity, the difference between the two devices was not significant for 5 hops in place height (1.8 cm), force during squat (-1.4 N · kg-1) and countermovement (0.1 N · kg-1) jumps, leg stiffness (7.8 kN · m-1) and reactivity index (0.4). So, the measurements of these variables with this accelerometer are valid, which is not the case for the other variables. The main causes of non-validity for velocity, power and contact time assessment are temporal biases of the takeoff and touchdown moments detection.http://www.termedia.pl/RELIABILITY-AND-VALIDITY-OF-AN-ACCELEROMETRIC-SYSTEM-FOR-ASSESSING-VERTICAL-JUMPING-PERFORMANCE,78,23205,1,1.htmlmeasurement biomechanics precision leg stiffness in-situ
spellingShingle M.-A. Choukou
G. Laffaye
R. Taiar
RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCE
Biology of Sport
measurement
biomechanics
precision
leg stiffness
in-situ
title RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCE
title_full RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCE
title_fullStr RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCE
title_full_unstemmed RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCE
title_short RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN ACCELEROMETRIC SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING VERTICAL JUMPING PERFORMANCE
title_sort reliability and validity of an accelerometric system for assessing vertical jumping performance
topic measurement
biomechanics
precision
leg stiffness
in-situ
url http://www.termedia.pl/RELIABILITY-AND-VALIDITY-OF-AN-ACCELEROMETRIC-SYSTEM-FOR-ASSESSING-VERTICAL-JUMPING-PERFORMANCE,78,23205,1,1.html
work_keys_str_mv AT machoukou reliabilityandvalidityofanaccelerometricsystemforassessingverticaljumpingperformance
AT glaffaye reliabilityandvalidityofanaccelerometricsystemforassessingverticaljumpingperformance
AT rtaiar reliabilityandvalidityofanaccelerometricsystemforassessingverticaljumpingperformance