Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the theoretical influence on intraocular lens power (PIOL) calculation of the use of keratometric approach for corneal power (Pc) calculation in keratoconus and to develop and validate an algorithm preliminarily to minimize this influence. Methods: Pcwas calcula...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vicente J Camps, David P Piñero, Esteban Caravaca, Dolores De Fez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2017;volume=65;issue=8;spage=690;epage=699;aulast=Camps
_version_ 1818318358673620992
author Vicente J Camps
David P Piñero
Esteban Caravaca
Dolores De Fez
author_facet Vicente J Camps
David P Piñero
Esteban Caravaca
Dolores De Fez
author_sort Vicente J Camps
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the theoretical influence on intraocular lens power (PIOL) calculation of the use of keratometric approach for corneal power (Pc) calculation in keratoconus and to develop and validate an algorithm preliminarily to minimize this influence. Methods: Pcwas calculated theoretically with the classical keratometric approach, the Gaussian equation, and the keratometric approach using a variable keratometric index (nkadj) dependent on r1c(Pkadj). Differences in PIOLcalculations (ΔPIOL) using keratometric and Gaussian Pcvalues were evaluated. Preliminary clinical validation of a PIOLalgorithm using Pkadjwas performed in 13 keratoconus eyes. Results: PIOLunderestimation was present if Pcwas overestimated, and vice versa. Theoretical PIOLoverestimation up to −5.6 D and −6.2 D using Le Grand and Gullstrand eye models was found for a keratometric index of 1.3375. If nkadjwas used, maximal Δ PIOLwas ±1.1 D, with most of the values ≤±0.6 D. Clinically, PIOLunder- and over-estimations ranged from −1.1 to − 0.4 D. No statistically significant differences were found between PIOLobtained with Pkadjand Gaussian equation (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The use of the keratometric Pcfor PIOLcalculations in keratoconus can lead to significant errors that may be minimized using a Pkadjapproach.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T09:51:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7fa83bd84c1f42ce90b6a3d58ef63a63
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T09:51:57Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-7fa83bd84c1f42ce90b6a3d58ef63a632022-12-21T23:51:54ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892017-01-0165869069910.4103/ijo.IJO_274_16Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconusVicente J CampsDavid P PiñeroEsteban CaravacaDolores De FezPurpose: This study aimed to evaluate the theoretical influence on intraocular lens power (PIOL) calculation of the use of keratometric approach for corneal power (Pc) calculation in keratoconus and to develop and validate an algorithm preliminarily to minimize this influence. Methods: Pcwas calculated theoretically with the classical keratometric approach, the Gaussian equation, and the keratometric approach using a variable keratometric index (nkadj) dependent on r1c(Pkadj). Differences in PIOLcalculations (ΔPIOL) using keratometric and Gaussian Pcvalues were evaluated. Preliminary clinical validation of a PIOLalgorithm using Pkadjwas performed in 13 keratoconus eyes. Results: PIOLunderestimation was present if Pcwas overestimated, and vice versa. Theoretical PIOLoverestimation up to −5.6 D and −6.2 D using Le Grand and Gullstrand eye models was found for a keratometric index of 1.3375. If nkadjwas used, maximal Δ PIOLwas ±1.1 D, with most of the values ≤±0.6 D. Clinically, PIOLunder- and over-estimations ranged from −1.1 to − 0.4 D. No statistically significant differences were found between PIOLobtained with Pkadjand Gaussian equation (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The use of the keratometric Pcfor PIOLcalculations in keratoconus can lead to significant errors that may be minimized using a Pkadjapproach.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2017;volume=65;issue=8;spage=690;epage=699;aulast=CampsCataract surgeryintraocular lens powerkeratoconuskeratometric indexkeratometry
spellingShingle Vicente J Camps
David P Piñero
Esteban Caravaca
Dolores De Fez
Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Cataract surgery
intraocular lens power
keratoconus
keratometric index
keratometry
title Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus
title_full Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus
title_fullStr Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus
title_short Preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus
title_sort preliminary validation of an optimized algorithm for intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus
topic Cataract surgery
intraocular lens power
keratoconus
keratometric index
keratometry
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2017;volume=65;issue=8;spage=690;epage=699;aulast=Camps
work_keys_str_mv AT vicentejcamps preliminaryvalidationofanoptimizedalgorithmforintraocularlenspowercalculationinkeratoconus
AT davidppinero preliminaryvalidationofanoptimizedalgorithmforintraocularlenspowercalculationinkeratoconus
AT estebancaravaca preliminaryvalidationofanoptimizedalgorithmforintraocularlenspowercalculationinkeratoconus
AT doloresdefez preliminaryvalidationofanoptimizedalgorithmforintraocularlenspowercalculationinkeratoconus