Association between Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders and Psychosocial Factors at Work: A Review on the Job DCS Model’s Perspective
Over years it has been increasingly concerned with how upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (UEMSDs) are attributed to psychosocial job stressors. A review study was conducted to examine associations between UEMSDs and psychosocial work factors, and to recommend what to consider for the associa...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2010-09-01
|
Series: | Safety and Health at Work |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791110110051 |
_version_ | 1797705993206890496 |
---|---|
author | Jung-Keun Park Seung-Hee Jang |
author_facet | Jung-Keun Park Seung-Hee Jang |
author_sort | Jung-Keun Park |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Over years it has been increasingly concerned with how upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (UEMSDs) are attributed to psychosocial job stressors. A review study was conducted to examine associations between UEMSDs and psychosocial work factors, and to recommend what to consider for the associations. For studies in which the job demand-control-support (DCS) model or its variables were specifically employed, published papers were selected and reviewed. A number of studies have reported relationships between UEMSDs symptoms and psychosocial exposure variables. For example, the findings are: higher numbness in the upper extremity was significantly attributed to by less decision latitude at work; work demands were significantly associated with neck and shoulder symptoms while control over time was associated with neck symptoms; and the combination of high psychosocial demands and low decision latitude was a significant predictor for shoulder and neck pain in a female working population. Sources of bias, such as interaction or study design, were discussed. UEMSDs were shown to be associated with psychosocial work factors in various studies where the job DCS model was addressed. Nonetheless, this review suggests that further studies should be conducted to much more clarify the association between UEMSDs and psychosocial factors. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T05:44:34Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-7fab2bde45834f2f8f4ee32152f67054 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2093-7911 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T05:44:34Z |
publishDate | 2010-09-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Safety and Health at Work |
spelling | doaj.art-7fab2bde45834f2f8f4ee32152f670542023-09-03T05:42:27ZengElsevierSafety and Health at Work2093-79112010-09-0111374210.5491/SHAW.2010.1.1.37Association between Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders and Psychosocial Factors at Work: A Review on the Job DCS Model’s PerspectiveJung-Keun ParkSeung-Hee JangOver years it has been increasingly concerned with how upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (UEMSDs) are attributed to psychosocial job stressors. A review study was conducted to examine associations between UEMSDs and psychosocial work factors, and to recommend what to consider for the associations. For studies in which the job demand-control-support (DCS) model or its variables were specifically employed, published papers were selected and reviewed. A number of studies have reported relationships between UEMSDs symptoms and psychosocial exposure variables. For example, the findings are: higher numbness in the upper extremity was significantly attributed to by less decision latitude at work; work demands were significantly associated with neck and shoulder symptoms while control over time was associated with neck symptoms; and the combination of high psychosocial demands and low decision latitude was a significant predictor for shoulder and neck pain in a female working population. Sources of bias, such as interaction or study design, were discussed. UEMSDs were shown to be associated with psychosocial work factors in various studies where the job DCS model was addressed. Nonetheless, this review suggests that further studies should be conducted to much more clarify the association between UEMSDs and psychosocial factors.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791110110051UEMSDsPsychosocial work factorsJob DCS model |
spellingShingle | Jung-Keun Park Seung-Hee Jang Association between Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders and Psychosocial Factors at Work: A Review on the Job DCS Model’s Perspective Safety and Health at Work UEMSDs Psychosocial work factors Job DCS model |
title | Association between Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders and Psychosocial Factors at Work: A Review on the Job DCS Model’s Perspective |
title_full | Association between Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders and Psychosocial Factors at Work: A Review on the Job DCS Model’s Perspective |
title_fullStr | Association between Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders and Psychosocial Factors at Work: A Review on the Job DCS Model’s Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Association between Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders and Psychosocial Factors at Work: A Review on the Job DCS Model’s Perspective |
title_short | Association between Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders and Psychosocial Factors at Work: A Review on the Job DCS Model’s Perspective |
title_sort | association between upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders and psychosocial factors at work a review on the job dcs model s perspective |
topic | UEMSDs Psychosocial work factors Job DCS model |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791110110051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jungkeunpark associationbetweenupperextremitymusculoskeletaldisordersandpsychosocialfactorsatworkareviewonthejobdcsmodelsperspective AT seungheejang associationbetweenupperextremitymusculoskeletaldisordersandpsychosocialfactorsatworkareviewonthejobdcsmodelsperspective |