Pond greenhouse gas emissions controlled by duckweed coverage

Freshwaters are significant contributors of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). Small waterbodies such as ponds are now recognized to have disproportionate greenhouse gas emissions relative to their size, but measured emissions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph Rabaey, James Cotner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Environmental Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.889289/full
_version_ 1811242902231187456
author Joseph Rabaey
James Cotner
author_facet Joseph Rabaey
James Cotner
author_sort Joseph Rabaey
collection DOAJ
description Freshwaters are significant contributors of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). Small waterbodies such as ponds are now recognized to have disproportionate greenhouse gas emissions relative to their size, but measured emissions from ponds have varied by several orders of magnitude. To assess drivers of variation in pond greenhouse gas dynamics, we measured concentrations and emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O across 26 ponds in Minnesota, United States, during the ice-free season. The studied ponds differed in land-use, from urban stormwater ponds to natural forested ponds. The ponds were all sources of greenhouse gases, driven by large CH4 emissions (mean 704 [sd 840] mg CH4-C m−2 d−1). CO2 fluxes were variable, but on average a sink (mean −25.9 [sd 862] mg CO2-C m−2 d−1), and N2O emissions were generally low (mean 0.398 [sd 0.747] mg N2O-N m−2 d−1). Duckweed coverage on the water surfaces ranged from 0% to 100% coverage, and had the largest influence on water chemistry and greenhouse gas dynamics across the ponds. Duckweed covered ponds (ponds with greater than 85% coverage) had higher phosphorus levels and increased anoxia compared to ponds without duckweed (ponds with less than 12% coverage), leading to higher CH4 concentrations and overall greenhouse gas emissions in the duckweed ponds. Duckweed ponds had a mean emission rate in CO2 equivalents of 30.9 g C m−2 d−1 compared to 11.0 g C m−2 d−1 in non-duckweed ponds.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T13:58:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7fb21005762c47ab83052ae74b5f2c25
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-665X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T13:58:47Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Environmental Science
spelling doaj.art-7fb21005762c47ab83052ae74b5f2c252022-12-22T03:30:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Environmental Science2296-665X2022-10-011010.3389/fenvs.2022.889289889289Pond greenhouse gas emissions controlled by duckweed coverageJoseph Rabaey0James Cotner1Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Saint Paul, MN, United StatesDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, NorwayFreshwaters are significant contributors of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). Small waterbodies such as ponds are now recognized to have disproportionate greenhouse gas emissions relative to their size, but measured emissions from ponds have varied by several orders of magnitude. To assess drivers of variation in pond greenhouse gas dynamics, we measured concentrations and emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O across 26 ponds in Minnesota, United States, during the ice-free season. The studied ponds differed in land-use, from urban stormwater ponds to natural forested ponds. The ponds were all sources of greenhouse gases, driven by large CH4 emissions (mean 704 [sd 840] mg CH4-C m−2 d−1). CO2 fluxes were variable, but on average a sink (mean −25.9 [sd 862] mg CO2-C m−2 d−1), and N2O emissions were generally low (mean 0.398 [sd 0.747] mg N2O-N m−2 d−1). Duckweed coverage on the water surfaces ranged from 0% to 100% coverage, and had the largest influence on water chemistry and greenhouse gas dynamics across the ponds. Duckweed covered ponds (ponds with greater than 85% coverage) had higher phosphorus levels and increased anoxia compared to ponds without duckweed (ponds with less than 12% coverage), leading to higher CH4 concentrations and overall greenhouse gas emissions in the duckweed ponds. Duckweed ponds had a mean emission rate in CO2 equivalents of 30.9 g C m−2 d−1 compared to 11.0 g C m−2 d−1 in non-duckweed ponds.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.889289/fullfloating macrophytesstormwater pondsgas fluxescarbon dioxide (CO2)methane (CH4)nitrous oxide (N2O)
spellingShingle Joseph Rabaey
James Cotner
Pond greenhouse gas emissions controlled by duckweed coverage
Frontiers in Environmental Science
floating macrophytes
stormwater ponds
gas fluxes
carbon dioxide (CO2)
methane (CH4)
nitrous oxide (N2O)
title Pond greenhouse gas emissions controlled by duckweed coverage
title_full Pond greenhouse gas emissions controlled by duckweed coverage
title_fullStr Pond greenhouse gas emissions controlled by duckweed coverage
title_full_unstemmed Pond greenhouse gas emissions controlled by duckweed coverage
title_short Pond greenhouse gas emissions controlled by duckweed coverage
title_sort pond greenhouse gas emissions controlled by duckweed coverage
topic floating macrophytes
stormwater ponds
gas fluxes
carbon dioxide (CO2)
methane (CH4)
nitrous oxide (N2O)
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.889289/full
work_keys_str_mv AT josephrabaey pondgreenhousegasemissionscontrolledbyduckweedcoverage
AT jamescotner pondgreenhousegasemissionscontrolledbyduckweedcoverage