Crestal bone stability after flapless placement of sloped implants with immediate temporization in edentulous mandible. A prospective comparative clinical trial

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate crestal bone stability around sloped implants using the flapless procedure and compare it with conventional implants placed axially. Materials and methods A total of 40 bone‐level implants with platform switching were used for this study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Algirdas Puisys, Viktorija Auzbikaviciute, Egle Vindasiute‐Narbute, Saulius Zukauskas, Kestutis Vaicekauskas, Dainius Razukevicus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-04-01
Series:Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.352
_version_ 1818715833317195776
author Algirdas Puisys
Viktorija Auzbikaviciute
Egle Vindasiute‐Narbute
Saulius Zukauskas
Kestutis Vaicekauskas
Dainius Razukevicus
author_facet Algirdas Puisys
Viktorija Auzbikaviciute
Egle Vindasiute‐Narbute
Saulius Zukauskas
Kestutis Vaicekauskas
Dainius Razukevicus
author_sort Algirdas Puisys
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate crestal bone stability around sloped implants using the flapless procedure and compare it with conventional implants placed axially. Materials and methods A total of 40 bone‐level implants with platform switching were used for this study for 10 patients (4 males and 6 females) in edentulous mandible. Twenty mesial conventional implants were placed in upright position and 20 distal 30° sloped implants tilted 30°. Bone loss was estimated using radiographic imaging after a 6‐ and a 12‐month follow‐up period. Comparison of the bone loss in the distal and mesial region at both implantation angles were conducted to understand the nature and progression of crestal bone loss. Results Crestal bone loss around the sloped implants was 0.29 mm (SD = 0.292) on average, while around conventional implants it was 0.22 mm (SD = 0.202) after one‐year follow‐up. However, there was no significant difference in the average of crestal bone loss between two trial groups after 6 months (p < 0.243) and one‐year (p < 0.614) follow‐up. The results indicated a 100% implant survival rate after one‐year follow‐up. Additionally, three fixed prostheses needed realignment after fracturing during the follow‐up time. Conclusion Considering the limitations of this study, it can be presumed that sloped and conventional implants with platform switching and conical connection have the same potential for minimal crestal bone loss.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T19:09:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7fc3fd989e9f49aeaf5099d59304ea41
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2057-4347
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T19:09:39Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
spelling doaj.art-7fc3fd989e9f49aeaf5099d59304ea412022-12-21T21:35:54ZengWileyClinical and Experimental Dental Research2057-43472021-04-017213113610.1002/cre2.352Crestal bone stability after flapless placement of sloped implants with immediate temporization in edentulous mandible. A prospective comparative clinical trialAlgirdas Puisys0Viktorija Auzbikaviciute1Egle Vindasiute‐Narbute2Saulius Zukauskas3Kestutis Vaicekauskas4Dainius Razukevicus5Vilnius Research Group, Private Practice VIC Clinic Vilnius LithuaniaVIC Clinic Vilnius LithuaniaInstitute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University Vilnius LithuaniaInstitute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University Vilnius LithuaniaVIC Clinic Vilnius LithuaniaLithuania University of Health Science Kaunas LithuaniaAbstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate crestal bone stability around sloped implants using the flapless procedure and compare it with conventional implants placed axially. Materials and methods A total of 40 bone‐level implants with platform switching were used for this study for 10 patients (4 males and 6 females) in edentulous mandible. Twenty mesial conventional implants were placed in upright position and 20 distal 30° sloped implants tilted 30°. Bone loss was estimated using radiographic imaging after a 6‐ and a 12‐month follow‐up period. Comparison of the bone loss in the distal and mesial region at both implantation angles were conducted to understand the nature and progression of crestal bone loss. Results Crestal bone loss around the sloped implants was 0.29 mm (SD = 0.292) on average, while around conventional implants it was 0.22 mm (SD = 0.202) after one‐year follow‐up. However, there was no significant difference in the average of crestal bone loss between two trial groups after 6 months (p < 0.243) and one‐year (p < 0.614) follow‐up. The results indicated a 100% implant survival rate after one‐year follow‐up. Additionally, three fixed prostheses needed realignment after fracturing during the follow‐up time. Conclusion Considering the limitations of this study, it can be presumed that sloped and conventional implants with platform switching and conical connection have the same potential for minimal crestal bone loss.https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.352All‐on‐4crestal bone stabilitysloped implantstilted implants
spellingShingle Algirdas Puisys
Viktorija Auzbikaviciute
Egle Vindasiute‐Narbute
Saulius Zukauskas
Kestutis Vaicekauskas
Dainius Razukevicus
Crestal bone stability after flapless placement of sloped implants with immediate temporization in edentulous mandible. A prospective comparative clinical trial
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
All‐on‐4
crestal bone stability
sloped implants
tilted implants
title Crestal bone stability after flapless placement of sloped implants with immediate temporization in edentulous mandible. A prospective comparative clinical trial
title_full Crestal bone stability after flapless placement of sloped implants with immediate temporization in edentulous mandible. A prospective comparative clinical trial
title_fullStr Crestal bone stability after flapless placement of sloped implants with immediate temporization in edentulous mandible. A prospective comparative clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Crestal bone stability after flapless placement of sloped implants with immediate temporization in edentulous mandible. A prospective comparative clinical trial
title_short Crestal bone stability after flapless placement of sloped implants with immediate temporization in edentulous mandible. A prospective comparative clinical trial
title_sort crestal bone stability after flapless placement of sloped implants with immediate temporization in edentulous mandible a prospective comparative clinical trial
topic All‐on‐4
crestal bone stability
sloped implants
tilted implants
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.352
work_keys_str_mv AT algirdaspuisys crestalbonestabilityafterflaplessplacementofslopedimplantswithimmediatetemporizationinedentulousmandibleaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrial
AT viktorijaauzbikaviciute crestalbonestabilityafterflaplessplacementofslopedimplantswithimmediatetemporizationinedentulousmandibleaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrial
AT eglevindasiutenarbute crestalbonestabilityafterflaplessplacementofslopedimplantswithimmediatetemporizationinedentulousmandibleaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrial
AT sauliuszukauskas crestalbonestabilityafterflaplessplacementofslopedimplantswithimmediatetemporizationinedentulousmandibleaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrial
AT kestutisvaicekauskas crestalbonestabilityafterflaplessplacementofslopedimplantswithimmediatetemporizationinedentulousmandibleaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrial
AT dainiusrazukevicus crestalbonestabilityafterflaplessplacementofslopedimplantswithimmediatetemporizationinedentulousmandibleaprospectivecomparativeclinicaltrial