Can the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scales be adapted for use in the context of osteoarthritis with general practitioners and physiotherapists?

Abstract Background Conservative, first-line treatments (exercise, education and weight-loss if appropriate) for hip and knee joint osteoarthritis are underused despite the known benefits. Clinicians’ beliefs can affect the advice and education given to patients, in turn, this can influence the upta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel W. O’Brien, Sandra Bassett, Valerie Wright-St Clair, Richard J. Siegert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-04-01
Series:BMC Rheumatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41927-020-0116-1
_version_ 1818923866309787648
author Daniel W. O’Brien
Sandra Bassett
Valerie Wright-St Clair
Richard J. Siegert
author_facet Daniel W. O’Brien
Sandra Bassett
Valerie Wright-St Clair
Richard J. Siegert
author_sort Daniel W. O’Brien
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Conservative, first-line treatments (exercise, education and weight-loss if appropriate) for hip and knee joint osteoarthritis are underused despite the known benefits. Clinicians’ beliefs can affect the advice and education given to patients, in turn, this can influence the uptake of treatment. In New Zealand, most conservative OA management is prescribed by general practitioners (GPs; primary care physicians) and physiotherapists. Few questionnaires have been designed to measure GPs’ and physiotherapists’ osteoarthritis-related health, illness and treatment beliefs. This study aimed to identify if a questionnaire about low back pain beliefs, the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT), can be adapted to assess GP and physiotherapists’ beliefs about osteoarthritis. Methods This study used a cross-sectional observational design. Data were collected anonymously from GPs and physiotherapists using an online survey. The survey included a study-specific demographic and occupational characteristics questionnaire and the PABS-PT questionnaire adapted for osteoarthritis. All data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and the PABS-PT data underwent principal factor analysis. Results In total, 295 clinicians (87 GPs, 208 physiotherapists) participated in this study. The principal factor analysis identified two factors or subscales (categorised as biomedical and behavioural), with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.84 and 0.44, respectively. Conclusions The biomedical subscale of the PABS-PT appears appropriate for adaptation for use in the context of osteoarthritis, but the low internal consistency of the behavioural subscale suggests this subscale is not currently suitable. Future research should consider the inclusion of additional items to the behavioural subscale to improve internal consistency or look to develop a new, osteoarthritis-specific questionnaire. Trial registration This trial was part of the primary author’s PhD, which began in 2012 and therefore this study was not registered.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T02:16:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7fca492d22aa4cf09d44cd449ea50751
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2520-1026
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T02:16:14Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Rheumatology
spelling doaj.art-7fca492d22aa4cf09d44cd449ea507512022-12-21T19:56:55ZengBMCBMC Rheumatology2520-10262020-04-01411710.1186/s41927-020-0116-1Can the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scales be adapted for use in the context of osteoarthritis with general practitioners and physiotherapists?Daniel W. O’Brien0Sandra Bassett1Valerie Wright-St Clair2Richard J. Siegert3Physiotherapy Department, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of TechnologyPhysiotherapy Department, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of TechnologyOccupational Therapy Department, Auckland University of TechnologyPsychology Department, Auckland University of TechnologyAbstract Background Conservative, first-line treatments (exercise, education and weight-loss if appropriate) for hip and knee joint osteoarthritis are underused despite the known benefits. Clinicians’ beliefs can affect the advice and education given to patients, in turn, this can influence the uptake of treatment. In New Zealand, most conservative OA management is prescribed by general practitioners (GPs; primary care physicians) and physiotherapists. Few questionnaires have been designed to measure GPs’ and physiotherapists’ osteoarthritis-related health, illness and treatment beliefs. This study aimed to identify if a questionnaire about low back pain beliefs, the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT), can be adapted to assess GP and physiotherapists’ beliefs about osteoarthritis. Methods This study used a cross-sectional observational design. Data were collected anonymously from GPs and physiotherapists using an online survey. The survey included a study-specific demographic and occupational characteristics questionnaire and the PABS-PT questionnaire adapted for osteoarthritis. All data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and the PABS-PT data underwent principal factor analysis. Results In total, 295 clinicians (87 GPs, 208 physiotherapists) participated in this study. The principal factor analysis identified two factors or subscales (categorised as biomedical and behavioural), with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.84 and 0.44, respectively. Conclusions The biomedical subscale of the PABS-PT appears appropriate for adaptation for use in the context of osteoarthritis, but the low internal consistency of the behavioural subscale suggests this subscale is not currently suitable. Future research should consider the inclusion of additional items to the behavioural subscale to improve internal consistency or look to develop a new, osteoarthritis-specific questionnaire. Trial registration This trial was part of the primary author’s PhD, which began in 2012 and therefore this study was not registered.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41927-020-0116-1OsteoarthritisHealth and illness beliefsQuantitative measures
spellingShingle Daniel W. O’Brien
Sandra Bassett
Valerie Wright-St Clair
Richard J. Siegert
Can the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scales be adapted for use in the context of osteoarthritis with general practitioners and physiotherapists?
BMC Rheumatology
Osteoarthritis
Health and illness beliefs
Quantitative measures
title Can the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scales be adapted for use in the context of osteoarthritis with general practitioners and physiotherapists?
title_full Can the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scales be adapted for use in the context of osteoarthritis with general practitioners and physiotherapists?
title_fullStr Can the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scales be adapted for use in the context of osteoarthritis with general practitioners and physiotherapists?
title_full_unstemmed Can the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scales be adapted for use in the context of osteoarthritis with general practitioners and physiotherapists?
title_short Can the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scales be adapted for use in the context of osteoarthritis with general practitioners and physiotherapists?
title_sort can the pain attitudes and beliefs scales be adapted for use in the context of osteoarthritis with general practitioners and physiotherapists
topic Osteoarthritis
Health and illness beliefs
Quantitative measures
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41927-020-0116-1
work_keys_str_mv AT danielwobrien canthepainattitudesandbeliefsscalesbeadaptedforuseinthecontextofosteoarthritiswithgeneralpractitionersandphysiotherapists
AT sandrabassett canthepainattitudesandbeliefsscalesbeadaptedforuseinthecontextofosteoarthritiswithgeneralpractitionersandphysiotherapists
AT valeriewrightstclair canthepainattitudesandbeliefsscalesbeadaptedforuseinthecontextofosteoarthritiswithgeneralpractitionersandphysiotherapists
AT richardjsiegert canthepainattitudesandbeliefsscalesbeadaptedforuseinthecontextofosteoarthritiswithgeneralpractitionersandphysiotherapists