Clinical and Surgical Evaluations of Reoperation After Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement Due to Different Etiologies

Background:This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and surgical characteristics of patients who required reoperation after mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR).Methods:We retrospectively identified 204 consecutive patients who underwent reoperation after mechanical MVR between 2009 and 2018....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiehui Li, Shuiyun Wang, Hansong Sun, Jianping Xu, Chao Dong, Min Song, Qibin Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.778750/full
_version_ 1831713800585216000
author Jiehui Li
Shuiyun Wang
Hansong Sun
Jianping Xu
Chao Dong
Min Song
Qibin Yu
author_facet Jiehui Li
Shuiyun Wang
Hansong Sun
Jianping Xu
Chao Dong
Min Song
Qibin Yu
author_sort Jiehui Li
collection DOAJ
description Background:This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and surgical characteristics of patients who required reoperation after mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR).Methods:We retrospectively identified 204 consecutive patients who underwent reoperation after mechanical MVR between 2009 and 2018. Patients were categorized according the reason for reoperation (perivalvular leakage, thrombus formation, or pannus formation). The patients' medical and surgical records were studied carefully and the rates of in-hospital complications were calculated.Results:The mean age was 51±12 years and 44% of the patients were male. The reasons for reoperation were perivalvular leakage (117 patients), thrombus formation (35 patients), and pannus formation (52 patients). The most common positions for perivalvular leakage were at the 6–10 o'clock positions (proportions of ≥25% for each hour position). Most patients had an interval of >10 years between the original MVR and reoperation. The most common reoperation procedure was re-do MVR (157 patients), and 155 of these patients underwent concomitant cardiac procedures. There were 10 in-hospital deaths and 32 patients experienced complications. The 10-year survival rate was 82.2 ± 3.9% in general, and the group of lowest rate was patients with PVL (77.5 ± 5.2%). The independent risk factors were “male” (4.62, 95% CI 1.57–13.58, P = 0.005) and “Hb <9g/dL before redo MV operation” (3.45, 95% CI 1.13–10.49, P = 0.029).Conclusion:Perivalvular leakage was the most common reason for reoperation after mechanical MVR, with a low survival rate in long term follow-up relatively.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T23:47:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7fce153841b14306b82076be4d84a98b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T23:47:32Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-7fce153841b14306b82076be4d84a98b2022-12-21T19:22:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2022-01-01810.3389/fcvm.2021.778750778750Clinical and Surgical Evaluations of Reoperation After Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement Due to Different EtiologiesJiehui LiShuiyun WangHansong SunJianping XuChao DongMin SongQibin YuBackground:This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and surgical characteristics of patients who required reoperation after mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR).Methods:We retrospectively identified 204 consecutive patients who underwent reoperation after mechanical MVR between 2009 and 2018. Patients were categorized according the reason for reoperation (perivalvular leakage, thrombus formation, or pannus formation). The patients' medical and surgical records were studied carefully and the rates of in-hospital complications were calculated.Results:The mean age was 51±12 years and 44% of the patients were male. The reasons for reoperation were perivalvular leakage (117 patients), thrombus formation (35 patients), and pannus formation (52 patients). The most common positions for perivalvular leakage were at the 6–10 o'clock positions (proportions of ≥25% for each hour position). Most patients had an interval of >10 years between the original MVR and reoperation. The most common reoperation procedure was re-do MVR (157 patients), and 155 of these patients underwent concomitant cardiac procedures. There were 10 in-hospital deaths and 32 patients experienced complications. The 10-year survival rate was 82.2 ± 3.9% in general, and the group of lowest rate was patients with PVL (77.5 ± 5.2%). The independent risk factors were “male” (4.62, 95% CI 1.57–13.58, P = 0.005) and “Hb <9g/dL before redo MV operation” (3.45, 95% CI 1.13–10.49, P = 0.029).Conclusion:Perivalvular leakage was the most common reason for reoperation after mechanical MVR, with a low survival rate in long term follow-up relatively.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.778750/fullprosthesis malfunctionmitral valve replacementperivalvular leakagethrombuspannus
spellingShingle Jiehui Li
Shuiyun Wang
Hansong Sun
Jianping Xu
Chao Dong
Min Song
Qibin Yu
Clinical and Surgical Evaluations of Reoperation After Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement Due to Different Etiologies
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
prosthesis malfunction
mitral valve replacement
perivalvular leakage
thrombus
pannus
title Clinical and Surgical Evaluations of Reoperation After Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement Due to Different Etiologies
title_full Clinical and Surgical Evaluations of Reoperation After Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement Due to Different Etiologies
title_fullStr Clinical and Surgical Evaluations of Reoperation After Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement Due to Different Etiologies
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Surgical Evaluations of Reoperation After Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement Due to Different Etiologies
title_short Clinical and Surgical Evaluations of Reoperation After Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement Due to Different Etiologies
title_sort clinical and surgical evaluations of reoperation after mechanical mitral valve replacement due to different etiologies
topic prosthesis malfunction
mitral valve replacement
perivalvular leakage
thrombus
pannus
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.778750/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jiehuili clinicalandsurgicalevaluationsofreoperationaftermechanicalmitralvalvereplacementduetodifferentetiologies
AT shuiyunwang clinicalandsurgicalevaluationsofreoperationaftermechanicalmitralvalvereplacementduetodifferentetiologies
AT hansongsun clinicalandsurgicalevaluationsofreoperationaftermechanicalmitralvalvereplacementduetodifferentetiologies
AT jianpingxu clinicalandsurgicalevaluationsofreoperationaftermechanicalmitralvalvereplacementduetodifferentetiologies
AT chaodong clinicalandsurgicalevaluationsofreoperationaftermechanicalmitralvalvereplacementduetodifferentetiologies
AT minsong clinicalandsurgicalevaluationsofreoperationaftermechanicalmitralvalvereplacementduetodifferentetiologies
AT qibinyu clinicalandsurgicalevaluationsofreoperationaftermechanicalmitralvalvereplacementduetodifferentetiologies