Scientific Production and total ankle arthroplasty
Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to report clinical outcomes on total ankle replacement (TAR) whose data were extracted from national registers. Methods: A systematic review of the literature, to identify all studies reporting outcomes after t...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2018-09-01
|
| Series: | Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011418S00262 |
| _version_ | 1828868219117502464 |
|---|---|
| author | Cristian Indino MD Riccardo D’Ambrosi MD Federico Giuseppe Usuelli MD |
| author_facet | Cristian Indino MD Riccardo D’Ambrosi MD Federico Giuseppe Usuelli MD |
| author_sort | Cristian Indino MD |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to report clinical outcomes on total ankle replacement (TAR) whose data were extracted from national registers. Methods: A systematic review of the literature, to identify all studies reporting outcomes after total ankle replacement, was performed. Two independent investigators performed the research using MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Embase and Cochrane Databases (1950 to December 2017). Results: Analysis of the literature included 18 articles from 2007 to 2017. Of these 5 articles performed a comprehensive analysis of the national registers, 5 articles evaluated complications and reasons of failure after TAR, 6 articles made a specific outcome register analysis, one article compared TAR and ankle arthrodesis while the last one analysed the role of TAR in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Conclusion: Scientific publications extracted from national joint registers for total ankle replacement provide useful but heterogeneous information on implants survivorship, implant models and risk factors. There is still a discrepancy between the data reported by designers in clinical studies and the data reported by the registries. The centralization of registers in specialized hospitals with dedicated surgeons, the use of patient reported outcomes (PROMs) in association with surgeon assessments and periodical publications can improve the development of registries and consequently of the literature in this regard. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T05:26:41Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7fdc94be17924ce69c692140b9799990 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2473-0114 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T05:26:41Z |
| publishDate | 2018-09-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics |
| spelling | doaj.art-7fdc94be17924ce69c692140b97999902022-12-21T23:58:10ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142018-09-01310.1177/2473011418S00262Scientific Production and total ankle arthroplastyCristian Indino MDRiccardo D’Ambrosi MDFederico Giuseppe Usuelli MDCategory: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to report clinical outcomes on total ankle replacement (TAR) whose data were extracted from national registers. Methods: A systematic review of the literature, to identify all studies reporting outcomes after total ankle replacement, was performed. Two independent investigators performed the research using MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Embase and Cochrane Databases (1950 to December 2017). Results: Analysis of the literature included 18 articles from 2007 to 2017. Of these 5 articles performed a comprehensive analysis of the national registers, 5 articles evaluated complications and reasons of failure after TAR, 6 articles made a specific outcome register analysis, one article compared TAR and ankle arthrodesis while the last one analysed the role of TAR in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Conclusion: Scientific publications extracted from national joint registers for total ankle replacement provide useful but heterogeneous information on implants survivorship, implant models and risk factors. There is still a discrepancy between the data reported by designers in clinical studies and the data reported by the registries. The centralization of registers in specialized hospitals with dedicated surgeons, the use of patient reported outcomes (PROMs) in association with surgeon assessments and periodical publications can improve the development of registries and consequently of the literature in this regard.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011418S00262 |
| spellingShingle | Cristian Indino MD Riccardo D’Ambrosi MD Federico Giuseppe Usuelli MD Scientific Production and total ankle arthroplasty Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics |
| title | Scientific Production and total ankle arthroplasty |
| title_full | Scientific Production and total ankle arthroplasty |
| title_fullStr | Scientific Production and total ankle arthroplasty |
| title_full_unstemmed | Scientific Production and total ankle arthroplasty |
| title_short | Scientific Production and total ankle arthroplasty |
| title_sort | scientific production and total ankle arthroplasty |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011418S00262 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cristianindinomd scientificproductionandtotalanklearthroplasty AT riccardodambrosimd scientificproductionandtotalanklearthroplasty AT federicogiuseppeusuellimd scientificproductionandtotalanklearthroplasty |