Cost-Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin in Chinese Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Real-Life and Modelling Analyses.

Many of the cost-effectiveness analyses of apixaban against warfarin focused on Western populations but Asian evidence remains less clear. The present study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of apixaban against warfarin in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) from a pu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xue Li, Vicki C Tse, Wallis C Y Lau, Bernard M Y Cheung, Gregory Y H Lip, Ian C K Wong, Esther W Chan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4928891?pdf=render
_version_ 1811321020388212736
author Xue Li
Vicki C Tse
Wallis C Y Lau
Bernard M Y Cheung
Gregory Y H Lip
Ian C K Wong
Esther W Chan
author_facet Xue Li
Vicki C Tse
Wallis C Y Lau
Bernard M Y Cheung
Gregory Y H Lip
Ian C K Wong
Esther W Chan
author_sort Xue Li
collection DOAJ
description Many of the cost-effectiveness analyses of apixaban against warfarin focused on Western populations but Asian evidence remains less clear. The present study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of apixaban against warfarin in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) from a public institutional perspective in Hong Kong.We used a Markov model incorporating 12 health state transitions, and simulated the disease progression of NVAF in 1,000 hypothetical patients treated with apixaban/warfarin. Risks of clinical events were based on the ARISTOTLE trial and were adjusted with local International Normalized Ratio control, defined as the time in therapeutic range. Real-life input for the model, including patients' demographics and clinical profiles, post-event treatment patterns, and healthcare costs, were determined by a retrospective cohort of 40,569 incident patients retrieved from a Hong Kong-wide electronic medical database. Main outcome measurements included numbers of thromboembolic and bleeding events, life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct healthcare cost. When comparing apixaban and warfarin, treatment with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) less than one local GDP per capita (USD 33,534 in 2014) was defined to be cost-effective.In the lifetime simulation, fewer numbers of events were estimated for the apixaban group, resulting in reduced event-related direct medical costs. The estimated ICER of apixaban was USD 7,057 per QALY at base-case analysis and ranged from USD 1,061 to 14,867 per QALY under the 116 tested scenarios in deterministic sensitivity analysis. While in probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability of apixaban being the cost-effective alternative to warfarin was 96% and 98% at a willingness to pay threshold of USD 33,534 and 100,602 per QALY, respectively.Apixaban is likely to be a cost-effective alternative to warfarin for stroke prophylaxis in Chinese patients with NVAF in Hong Kong.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T13:09:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7fea6b83e3e6456d94418688f1c1380e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T13:09:40Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-7fea6b83e3e6456d94418688f1c1380e2022-12-22T02:45:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01116e015712910.1371/journal.pone.0157129Cost-Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin in Chinese Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Real-Life and Modelling Analyses.Xue LiVicki C TseWallis C Y LauBernard M Y CheungGregory Y H LipIan C K WongEsther W ChanMany of the cost-effectiveness analyses of apixaban against warfarin focused on Western populations but Asian evidence remains less clear. The present study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of apixaban against warfarin in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) from a public institutional perspective in Hong Kong.We used a Markov model incorporating 12 health state transitions, and simulated the disease progression of NVAF in 1,000 hypothetical patients treated with apixaban/warfarin. Risks of clinical events were based on the ARISTOTLE trial and were adjusted with local International Normalized Ratio control, defined as the time in therapeutic range. Real-life input for the model, including patients' demographics and clinical profiles, post-event treatment patterns, and healthcare costs, were determined by a retrospective cohort of 40,569 incident patients retrieved from a Hong Kong-wide electronic medical database. Main outcome measurements included numbers of thromboembolic and bleeding events, life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct healthcare cost. When comparing apixaban and warfarin, treatment with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) less than one local GDP per capita (USD 33,534 in 2014) was defined to be cost-effective.In the lifetime simulation, fewer numbers of events were estimated for the apixaban group, resulting in reduced event-related direct medical costs. The estimated ICER of apixaban was USD 7,057 per QALY at base-case analysis and ranged from USD 1,061 to 14,867 per QALY under the 116 tested scenarios in deterministic sensitivity analysis. While in probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability of apixaban being the cost-effective alternative to warfarin was 96% and 98% at a willingness to pay threshold of USD 33,534 and 100,602 per QALY, respectively.Apixaban is likely to be a cost-effective alternative to warfarin for stroke prophylaxis in Chinese patients with NVAF in Hong Kong.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4928891?pdf=render
spellingShingle Xue Li
Vicki C Tse
Wallis C Y Lau
Bernard M Y Cheung
Gregory Y H Lip
Ian C K Wong
Esther W Chan
Cost-Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin in Chinese Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Real-Life and Modelling Analyses.
PLoS ONE
title Cost-Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin in Chinese Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Real-Life and Modelling Analyses.
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin in Chinese Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Real-Life and Modelling Analyses.
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin in Chinese Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Real-Life and Modelling Analyses.
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin in Chinese Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Real-Life and Modelling Analyses.
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin in Chinese Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Real-Life and Modelling Analyses.
title_sort cost effectiveness of apixaban versus warfarin in chinese patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation a real life and modelling analyses
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4928891?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT xueli costeffectivenessofapixabanversuswarfarininchinesepatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationareallifeandmodellinganalyses
AT vickictse costeffectivenessofapixabanversuswarfarininchinesepatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationareallifeandmodellinganalyses
AT walliscylau costeffectivenessofapixabanversuswarfarininchinesepatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationareallifeandmodellinganalyses
AT bernardmycheung costeffectivenessofapixabanversuswarfarininchinesepatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationareallifeandmodellinganalyses
AT gregoryyhlip costeffectivenessofapixabanversuswarfarininchinesepatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationareallifeandmodellinganalyses
AT ianckwong costeffectivenessofapixabanversuswarfarininchinesepatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationareallifeandmodellinganalyses
AT estherwchan costeffectivenessofapixabanversuswarfarininchinesepatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillationareallifeandmodellinganalyses