Comparative study of quality of leukoreduced packed red blood cell units as assessed by nageotte hemocytometry and flow cytometry

PURPOSE: Assessment of residual white blood cell (rWBC) count is vital to ascertain the quality of leukodepleted (LD) blood components. Automated cell analyzers lack the sensitivity for the assessment of very few leukocytes as found in LD blood components. Flow Cytometry (FC) based methods and Nageo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohd Anas Sheikh, Amit Kumar Biswas, Ajay Kumar Baranwal, Neerja Kushwaha, Santosh Karade, Joseph Philip
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Asian Journal of Transfusion Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ajts.org/article.asp?issn=0973-6247;year=2023;volume=17;issue=1;spage=63;epage=68;aulast=Sheikh
_version_ 1797866712624791552
author Mohd Anas Sheikh
Amit Kumar Biswas
Ajay Kumar Baranwal
Neerja Kushwaha
Santosh Karade
Joseph Philip
author_facet Mohd Anas Sheikh
Amit Kumar Biswas
Ajay Kumar Baranwal
Neerja Kushwaha
Santosh Karade
Joseph Philip
author_sort Mohd Anas Sheikh
collection DOAJ
description PURPOSE: Assessment of residual white blood cell (rWBC) count is vital to ascertain the quality of leukodepleted (LD) blood components. Automated cell analyzers lack the sensitivity for the assessment of very few leukocytes as found in LD blood components. Flow Cytometry (FC) based methods and Nageotte hemocytometer are the most commonly used techniques for this purpose. The objective of this study was to compare the use of Nageotte hemocytometer and FC for quality control of LD red blood cell units. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, observational study was conducted in the Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion of a tertiary care center from September 2018 to September 2020. About 303 LD-packed red blood cell units were tested by FC and Nageotte hemocytometer for rWBCs. RESULTS: The number of rWBC (mean) detected by flow cytometer and Nageotte's hemocytometer was 1.06 ± 0.43 white blood cell (WBC)/μL and 0.67 ± 0.39 WBC/μL, respectively. Coefficient of variation was 58.37% by Nageotte hemocytometer method and 40.46% by FC. Linear regression analysis did not show any correlation (R2 = 0.098, P = 0.001) whereas Pearson's correlation coefficient showed a weak relation (r = 0.31) between the two methods. CONCLUSION: Flow cytometric technique provides a more precise and accurate objective tool compared to Nageotte hemocytometer which is labor intensive, time consuming, and prone to errors arising out of subjectivity along with reported underestimation bias. In the absence of adequate infrastructure, resources, and trained workforce, Nageotte hemocytometer method is a reliable alternative. Nageotte's chamber could be best used in the resource-constrained setup as it offers a relatively inexpensive, simple, and viable means to enumerate rWBCs.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T23:29:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7ff251ea440141bcb71047a0b8f4e8eb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0973-6247
1998-3565
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T23:29:46Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Transfusion Science
spelling doaj.art-7ff251ea440141bcb71047a0b8f4e8eb2023-03-21T07:27:37ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAsian Journal of Transfusion Science0973-62471998-35652023-01-01171636810.4103/ajts.AJTS_101_21Comparative study of quality of leukoreduced packed red blood cell units as assessed by nageotte hemocytometry and flow cytometryMohd Anas SheikhAmit Kumar BiswasAjay Kumar BaranwalNeerja KushwahaSantosh KaradeJoseph PhilipPURPOSE: Assessment of residual white blood cell (rWBC) count is vital to ascertain the quality of leukodepleted (LD) blood components. Automated cell analyzers lack the sensitivity for the assessment of very few leukocytes as found in LD blood components. Flow Cytometry (FC) based methods and Nageotte hemocytometer are the most commonly used techniques for this purpose. The objective of this study was to compare the use of Nageotte hemocytometer and FC for quality control of LD red blood cell units. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, observational study was conducted in the Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion of a tertiary care center from September 2018 to September 2020. About 303 LD-packed red blood cell units were tested by FC and Nageotte hemocytometer for rWBCs. RESULTS: The number of rWBC (mean) detected by flow cytometer and Nageotte's hemocytometer was 1.06 ± 0.43 white blood cell (WBC)/μL and 0.67 ± 0.39 WBC/μL, respectively. Coefficient of variation was 58.37% by Nageotte hemocytometer method and 40.46% by FC. Linear regression analysis did not show any correlation (R2 = 0.098, P = 0.001) whereas Pearson's correlation coefficient showed a weak relation (r = 0.31) between the two methods. CONCLUSION: Flow cytometric technique provides a more precise and accurate objective tool compared to Nageotte hemocytometer which is labor intensive, time consuming, and prone to errors arising out of subjectivity along with reported underestimation bias. In the absence of adequate infrastructure, resources, and trained workforce, Nageotte hemocytometer method is a reliable alternative. Nageotte's chamber could be best used in the resource-constrained setup as it offers a relatively inexpensive, simple, and viable means to enumerate rWBCs.http://www.ajts.org/article.asp?issn=0973-6247;year=2023;volume=17;issue=1;spage=63;epage=68;aulast=Sheikhalloimmunizationflow cytometryleukodepletionnageotte hemocytometerquality controlresidual white blood cell count
spellingShingle Mohd Anas Sheikh
Amit Kumar Biswas
Ajay Kumar Baranwal
Neerja Kushwaha
Santosh Karade
Joseph Philip
Comparative study of quality of leukoreduced packed red blood cell units as assessed by nageotte hemocytometry and flow cytometry
Asian Journal of Transfusion Science
alloimmunization
flow cytometry
leukodepletion
nageotte hemocytometer
quality control
residual white blood cell count
title Comparative study of quality of leukoreduced packed red blood cell units as assessed by nageotte hemocytometry and flow cytometry
title_full Comparative study of quality of leukoreduced packed red blood cell units as assessed by nageotte hemocytometry and flow cytometry
title_fullStr Comparative study of quality of leukoreduced packed red blood cell units as assessed by nageotte hemocytometry and flow cytometry
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of quality of leukoreduced packed red blood cell units as assessed by nageotte hemocytometry and flow cytometry
title_short Comparative study of quality of leukoreduced packed red blood cell units as assessed by nageotte hemocytometry and flow cytometry
title_sort comparative study of quality of leukoreduced packed red blood cell units as assessed by nageotte hemocytometry and flow cytometry
topic alloimmunization
flow cytometry
leukodepletion
nageotte hemocytometer
quality control
residual white blood cell count
url http://www.ajts.org/article.asp?issn=0973-6247;year=2023;volume=17;issue=1;spage=63;epage=68;aulast=Sheikh
work_keys_str_mv AT mohdanassheikh comparativestudyofqualityofleukoreducedpackedredbloodcellunitsasassessedbynageottehemocytometryandflowcytometry
AT amitkumarbiswas comparativestudyofqualityofleukoreducedpackedredbloodcellunitsasassessedbynageottehemocytometryandflowcytometry
AT ajaykumarbaranwal comparativestudyofqualityofleukoreducedpackedredbloodcellunitsasassessedbynageottehemocytometryandflowcytometry
AT neerjakushwaha comparativestudyofqualityofleukoreducedpackedredbloodcellunitsasassessedbynageottehemocytometryandflowcytometry
AT santoshkarade comparativestudyofqualityofleukoreducedpackedredbloodcellunitsasassessedbynageottehemocytometryandflowcytometry
AT josephphilip comparativestudyofqualityofleukoreducedpackedredbloodcellunitsasassessedbynageottehemocytometryandflowcytometry