Development and initial application of a harmonised multi-jurisdiction work injury compensation database

Objectives Workers’ compensation schemes provide funding for wage replacement and healthcare for injured and ill workers. In Australia, workers’ compensation schemes operate independently in different jurisdictions, making comparisons of health service use challenging. We sought to develop and deplo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Di Donato, Luke R. Sheehan, Shannon Gray, Ross Iles, Caryn van Vreden, Alex Collie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-06-01
Series:Digital Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231176695
_version_ 1797809985224179712
author Michael Di Donato
Luke R. Sheehan
Shannon Gray
Ross Iles
Caryn van Vreden
Alex Collie
author_facet Michael Di Donato
Luke R. Sheehan
Shannon Gray
Ross Iles
Caryn van Vreden
Alex Collie
author_sort Michael Di Donato
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Workers’ compensation schemes provide funding for wage replacement and healthcare for injured and ill workers. In Australia, workers’ compensation schemes operate independently in different jurisdictions, making comparisons of health service use challenging. We sought to develop and deploy a new database of health service and income support data, harmonising data from multiple Australian workers’ compensation jurisdictions. Methods We worked with workers’ compensation authorities from six Australian jurisdictions to combine claims, healthcare, medicines and wage replacement data for a sample of compensated workers with claims for musculoskeletal conditions. We designed a structured relational database and developed a bespoke health services coding scheme to harmonise data across jurisdictions. Results The Multi-Jurisdiction Workers’ Compensation Database contains four data sets: claims, services, medicines and wage replacement. The claims data set contains 158,946 claims for low back pain (49.6%), limb fracture (23.8%) and non-specific limb conditions (26.7%). The services data set contains a total of 4.2 million cleaned and harmonised services including doctors (29.9%), physical therapists (56.3%), psychological therapists (2.8%), diagnostic procedures (5.5%) and examinations and assessments (5.6%). The medicines data set contains 524,380 medicine dispenses, with 208,504 (39.8%) dispenses for opioid analgesics. Conclusions The development of this database presents potential opportunities to gain a greater understanding of health service use in the Australian workers’ compensation sector, to measure the impact of policy change on health services and to provide a method for further data harmonisation. Future efforts could seek to conduct linkage with other data sources.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T07:02:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7ff67fdc953449568296110fe16d0f54
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-2076
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T07:02:17Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Digital Health
spelling doaj.art-7ff67fdc953449568296110fe16d0f542023-06-06T19:03:20ZengSAGE PublishingDigital Health2055-20762023-06-01910.1177/20552076231176695Development and initial application of a harmonised multi-jurisdiction work injury compensation databaseMichael Di DonatoLuke R. SheehanShannon Gray Ross IlesCaryn van VredenAlex CollieObjectives Workers’ compensation schemes provide funding for wage replacement and healthcare for injured and ill workers. In Australia, workers’ compensation schemes operate independently in different jurisdictions, making comparisons of health service use challenging. We sought to develop and deploy a new database of health service and income support data, harmonising data from multiple Australian workers’ compensation jurisdictions. Methods We worked with workers’ compensation authorities from six Australian jurisdictions to combine claims, healthcare, medicines and wage replacement data for a sample of compensated workers with claims for musculoskeletal conditions. We designed a structured relational database and developed a bespoke health services coding scheme to harmonise data across jurisdictions. Results The Multi-Jurisdiction Workers’ Compensation Database contains four data sets: claims, services, medicines and wage replacement. The claims data set contains 158,946 claims for low back pain (49.6%), limb fracture (23.8%) and non-specific limb conditions (26.7%). The services data set contains a total of 4.2 million cleaned and harmonised services including doctors (29.9%), physical therapists (56.3%), psychological therapists (2.8%), diagnostic procedures (5.5%) and examinations and assessments (5.6%). The medicines data set contains 524,380 medicine dispenses, with 208,504 (39.8%) dispenses for opioid analgesics. Conclusions The development of this database presents potential opportunities to gain a greater understanding of health service use in the Australian workers’ compensation sector, to measure the impact of policy change on health services and to provide a method for further data harmonisation. Future efforts could seek to conduct linkage with other data sources.https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231176695
spellingShingle Michael Di Donato
Luke R. Sheehan
Shannon Gray
Ross Iles
Caryn van Vreden
Alex Collie
Development and initial application of a harmonised multi-jurisdiction work injury compensation database
Digital Health
title Development and initial application of a harmonised multi-jurisdiction work injury compensation database
title_full Development and initial application of a harmonised multi-jurisdiction work injury compensation database
title_fullStr Development and initial application of a harmonised multi-jurisdiction work injury compensation database
title_full_unstemmed Development and initial application of a harmonised multi-jurisdiction work injury compensation database
title_short Development and initial application of a harmonised multi-jurisdiction work injury compensation database
title_sort development and initial application of a harmonised multi jurisdiction work injury compensation database
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231176695
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeldidonato developmentandinitialapplicationofaharmonisedmultijurisdictionworkinjurycompensationdatabase
AT lukersheehan developmentandinitialapplicationofaharmonisedmultijurisdictionworkinjurycompensationdatabase
AT shannongray developmentandinitialapplicationofaharmonisedmultijurisdictionworkinjurycompensationdatabase
AT rossiles developmentandinitialapplicationofaharmonisedmultijurisdictionworkinjurycompensationdatabase
AT carynvanvreden developmentandinitialapplicationofaharmonisedmultijurisdictionworkinjurycompensationdatabase
AT alexcollie developmentandinitialapplicationofaharmonisedmultijurisdictionworkinjurycompensationdatabase