Free word association analysis of German laypeople’s perception of biodiversity and its loss

Due to the dramatic biodiversity crisis, it is crucial to understand how people perceive biodiversity. Knowledge of how thoughts are organized around this concept can identify which ideas are best to focus on biodiversity conservation information campaigns. The primary aim of the present study was t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Annike Eylering, Kerstin Neufeld, Felix Kottmann, Sebastian Holt, Florian Fiebelkorn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112182/full
_version_ 1827914880797114368
author Annike Eylering
Kerstin Neufeld
Felix Kottmann
Sebastian Holt
Florian Fiebelkorn
author_facet Annike Eylering
Kerstin Neufeld
Felix Kottmann
Sebastian Holt
Florian Fiebelkorn
author_sort Annike Eylering
collection DOAJ
description Due to the dramatic biodiversity crisis, it is crucial to understand how people perceive biodiversity. Knowledge of how thoughts are organized around this concept can identify which ideas are best to focus on biodiversity conservation information campaigns. The primary aim of the present study was to identify social representations of the German public regarding the concept of biodiversity and its loss using a free word association test. Furthermore, unique association networks were analyzed. For this purpose, data collection was performed in September 2021 in Germany using an online questionnaire to assess participants’ associations with the prompt “biodiversity” (n  = 131) and “biodiversity loss” (n  = 130). Additionally, we used the social network software Gephi to create biodiversity (loss) association networks. The five most commonly mentioned associations for biodiversity were “animal,” “plant,” “nature,” “human,” and “flower.” For biodiversity loss, the five most commonly mentioned associations were “species extinction,” “climate change,” “plant,” “insect,” and “bee.” Neither “land use change” nor “invasive species,” as key drivers of biodiversity loss, were present in social representations of the German public. A difference was observed in the total number of mentioned associations between biodiversity and biodiversity loss. For both, the associations “plant” and “animal” were related. However, participants associated specific taxa only with animals, such as “insects” and “birds.” For plants, no specific taxa were named. Based on the network analysis, the most commonly mentioned word pairs for biodiversity and biodiversity loss were “plant – animal” and “species loss – climate change,” respectively. Based on our statistical network analysis, these associations were identified as the most central associations with the greatest influence in the network. Thus, they had the most connections and the function of predicting the flow in the network. In sum, the public’s multifaceted views on biodiversity and its loss, as well as the aforementioned central associations, hold great potential to be utilized more for the communication and education of biodiversity conservation. In addition, our findings contribute to the scientific community’s understanding of social representations and perceptions of biodiversity and its loss.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T02:50:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7ff9f853bd7e44f388acf9c2ef5f59d9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T02:50:31Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-7ff9f853bd7e44f388acf9c2ef5f59d92023-06-28T12:24:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-06-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.11121821112182Free word association analysis of German laypeople’s perception of biodiversity and its lossAnnike EyleringKerstin NeufeldFelix KottmannSebastian HoltFlorian FiebelkornDue to the dramatic biodiversity crisis, it is crucial to understand how people perceive biodiversity. Knowledge of how thoughts are organized around this concept can identify which ideas are best to focus on biodiversity conservation information campaigns. The primary aim of the present study was to identify social representations of the German public regarding the concept of biodiversity and its loss using a free word association test. Furthermore, unique association networks were analyzed. For this purpose, data collection was performed in September 2021 in Germany using an online questionnaire to assess participants’ associations with the prompt “biodiversity” (n  = 131) and “biodiversity loss” (n  = 130). Additionally, we used the social network software Gephi to create biodiversity (loss) association networks. The five most commonly mentioned associations for biodiversity were “animal,” “plant,” “nature,” “human,” and “flower.” For biodiversity loss, the five most commonly mentioned associations were “species extinction,” “climate change,” “plant,” “insect,” and “bee.” Neither “land use change” nor “invasive species,” as key drivers of biodiversity loss, were present in social representations of the German public. A difference was observed in the total number of mentioned associations between biodiversity and biodiversity loss. For both, the associations “plant” and “animal” were related. However, participants associated specific taxa only with animals, such as “insects” and “birds.” For plants, no specific taxa were named. Based on the network analysis, the most commonly mentioned word pairs for biodiversity and biodiversity loss were “plant – animal” and “species loss – climate change,” respectively. Based on our statistical network analysis, these associations were identified as the most central associations with the greatest influence in the network. Thus, they had the most connections and the function of predicting the flow in the network. In sum, the public’s multifaceted views on biodiversity and its loss, as well as the aforementioned central associations, hold great potential to be utilized more for the communication and education of biodiversity conservation. In addition, our findings contribute to the scientific community’s understanding of social representations and perceptions of biodiversity and its loss.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112182/fullsocial representation theorybiodiversity crisisfree word association testnetwork analysisclimate changespecies loss
spellingShingle Annike Eylering
Kerstin Neufeld
Felix Kottmann
Sebastian Holt
Florian Fiebelkorn
Free word association analysis of German laypeople’s perception of biodiversity and its loss
Frontiers in Psychology
social representation theory
biodiversity crisis
free word association test
network analysis
climate change
species loss
title Free word association analysis of German laypeople’s perception of biodiversity and its loss
title_full Free word association analysis of German laypeople’s perception of biodiversity and its loss
title_fullStr Free word association analysis of German laypeople’s perception of biodiversity and its loss
title_full_unstemmed Free word association analysis of German laypeople’s perception of biodiversity and its loss
title_short Free word association analysis of German laypeople’s perception of biodiversity and its loss
title_sort free word association analysis of german laypeople s perception of biodiversity and its loss
topic social representation theory
biodiversity crisis
free word association test
network analysis
climate change
species loss
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112182/full
work_keys_str_mv AT annikeeylering freewordassociationanalysisofgermanlaypeoplesperceptionofbiodiversityanditsloss
AT kerstinneufeld freewordassociationanalysisofgermanlaypeoplesperceptionofbiodiversityanditsloss
AT felixkottmann freewordassociationanalysisofgermanlaypeoplesperceptionofbiodiversityanditsloss
AT sebastianholt freewordassociationanalysisofgermanlaypeoplesperceptionofbiodiversityanditsloss
AT florianfiebelkorn freewordassociationanalysisofgermanlaypeoplesperceptionofbiodiversityanditsloss