Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Test a Network Model of Perceptual Decision Making in the Human Brain

Previous research has suggested that the lateral occipital cortex (LOC) is involved with visual decision making, and specifically with the accumulation of information leading to a decision. In humans, this research has been primarily based on imaging and electroencephalography (EEG), and as such onl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bruce Luber, David C. Jangraw, Greg Appelbaum, Austin Harrison, Susan Hilbig, Lysianne Beynel, Tristan Jones, Paul Sajda, Sarah H. Lisanby
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00004/full
_version_ 1818270664356790272
author Bruce Luber
David C. Jangraw
Greg Appelbaum
Austin Harrison
Susan Hilbig
Lysianne Beynel
Tristan Jones
Paul Sajda
Sarah H. Lisanby
author_facet Bruce Luber
David C. Jangraw
Greg Appelbaum
Austin Harrison
Susan Hilbig
Lysianne Beynel
Tristan Jones
Paul Sajda
Sarah H. Lisanby
author_sort Bruce Luber
collection DOAJ
description Previous research has suggested that the lateral occipital cortex (LOC) is involved with visual decision making, and specifically with the accumulation of information leading to a decision. In humans, this research has been primarily based on imaging and electroencephalography (EEG), and as such only correlational. One line of such research has led to a model of three spatially distributed brain networks that activate in temporal sequence to enable visual decision-making. The model predicted that disturbing neural processing in the LOC at a specific latency would slow object decision-making, increasing reaction time (RT) in a difficult discrimination task. We utilized transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to test this prediction, perturbing LOC beginning at 400 ms post-stimulus onset, a time in the model corresponding to LOC activation at a particular difficulty level, with the expectation of increased RT. Thirteen healthy adults participated in two TMS sessions in which left and right LOC were stimulated separately utilizing neuronavigation and robotic coil guidance. Participants performed a two-alternative forced-choice task selecting whether a car or face was present on each trial amidst visual noise pre-tested to approximate a 75% accuracy level. In an effort to disrupt processing, pairs of TMS pulses separated by 50 ms were presented at one of five stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs): −200, 200, 400, 450, or 500 ms. Behavioral performance differed systematically across SOAs for RT and accuracy measures. As predicted, TMS at 400 ms resulted in a significant slowing of RT. TMS delivered at −200 ms resulted in faster RT, indicating early stimulation may result in priming and performance enhancement. Use of TMS thus causally demonstrated the involvement of LOC in this task, and more broadly with perceptual decision-making; additionally, it demonstrated the role of TMS in testing well-developed neural models of perceptual processing.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T21:13:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7ffc7e90257646a98d8529028a71e7cf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T21:13:52Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-7ffc7e90257646a98d8529028a71e7cf2022-12-22T00:11:48ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612020-01-011410.3389/fnhum.2020.00004450862Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Test a Network Model of Perceptual Decision Making in the Human BrainBruce Luber0David C. Jangraw1Greg Appelbaum2Austin Harrison3Susan Hilbig4Lysianne Beynel5Tristan Jones6Paul Sajda7Sarah H. Lisanby8Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United StatesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United StatesPrevious research has suggested that the lateral occipital cortex (LOC) is involved with visual decision making, and specifically with the accumulation of information leading to a decision. In humans, this research has been primarily based on imaging and electroencephalography (EEG), and as such only correlational. One line of such research has led to a model of three spatially distributed brain networks that activate in temporal sequence to enable visual decision-making. The model predicted that disturbing neural processing in the LOC at a specific latency would slow object decision-making, increasing reaction time (RT) in a difficult discrimination task. We utilized transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to test this prediction, perturbing LOC beginning at 400 ms post-stimulus onset, a time in the model corresponding to LOC activation at a particular difficulty level, with the expectation of increased RT. Thirteen healthy adults participated in two TMS sessions in which left and right LOC were stimulated separately utilizing neuronavigation and robotic coil guidance. Participants performed a two-alternative forced-choice task selecting whether a car or face was present on each trial amidst visual noise pre-tested to approximate a 75% accuracy level. In an effort to disrupt processing, pairs of TMS pulses separated by 50 ms were presented at one of five stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs): −200, 200, 400, 450, or 500 ms. Behavioral performance differed systematically across SOAs for RT and accuracy measures. As predicted, TMS at 400 ms resulted in a significant slowing of RT. TMS delivered at −200 ms resulted in faster RT, indicating early stimulation may result in priming and performance enhancement. Use of TMS thus causally demonstrated the involvement of LOC in this task, and more broadly with perceptual decision-making; additionally, it demonstrated the role of TMS in testing well-developed neural models of perceptual processing.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00004/fulltranscranial magnetic stimulationperceptual decision makinglateral occipital complexobject discriminationchronometry
spellingShingle Bruce Luber
David C. Jangraw
Greg Appelbaum
Austin Harrison
Susan Hilbig
Lysianne Beynel
Tristan Jones
Paul Sajda
Sarah H. Lisanby
Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Test a Network Model of Perceptual Decision Making in the Human Brain
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
transcranial magnetic stimulation
perceptual decision making
lateral occipital complex
object discrimination
chronometry
title Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Test a Network Model of Perceptual Decision Making in the Human Brain
title_full Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Test a Network Model of Perceptual Decision Making in the Human Brain
title_fullStr Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Test a Network Model of Perceptual Decision Making in the Human Brain
title_full_unstemmed Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Test a Network Model of Perceptual Decision Making in the Human Brain
title_short Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Test a Network Model of Perceptual Decision Making in the Human Brain
title_sort using transcranial magnetic stimulation to test a network model of perceptual decision making in the human brain
topic transcranial magnetic stimulation
perceptual decision making
lateral occipital complex
object discrimination
chronometry
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00004/full
work_keys_str_mv AT bruceluber usingtranscranialmagneticstimulationtotestanetworkmodelofperceptualdecisionmakinginthehumanbrain
AT davidcjangraw usingtranscranialmagneticstimulationtotestanetworkmodelofperceptualdecisionmakinginthehumanbrain
AT gregappelbaum usingtranscranialmagneticstimulationtotestanetworkmodelofperceptualdecisionmakinginthehumanbrain
AT austinharrison usingtranscranialmagneticstimulationtotestanetworkmodelofperceptualdecisionmakinginthehumanbrain
AT susanhilbig usingtranscranialmagneticstimulationtotestanetworkmodelofperceptualdecisionmakinginthehumanbrain
AT lysiannebeynel usingtranscranialmagneticstimulationtotestanetworkmodelofperceptualdecisionmakinginthehumanbrain
AT tristanjones usingtranscranialmagneticstimulationtotestanetworkmodelofperceptualdecisionmakinginthehumanbrain
AT paulsajda usingtranscranialmagneticstimulationtotestanetworkmodelofperceptualdecisionmakinginthehumanbrain
AT sarahhlisanby usingtranscranialmagneticstimulationtotestanetworkmodelofperceptualdecisionmakinginthehumanbrain