Single-site, five-year experience with human eosinophil isolation by density gradient centrifugation and CD16 immunomagnetic negative separation

Abstract Objective Little has been reported regarding the reliability of methods for the purification of human blood eosinophils. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with 350 consecutive eosinophil isolations. Results Between January 2014 and December 2018, we conducted 350 eosinophil purific...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yun Cao, Sooncheon Shin, Daniela J. Carroll, Jeremy A. O’Sullivan, Bruce S. Bochner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-04-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-020-05055-9
_version_ 1818508542000234496
author Yun Cao
Sooncheon Shin
Daniela J. Carroll
Jeremy A. O’Sullivan
Bruce S. Bochner
author_facet Yun Cao
Sooncheon Shin
Daniela J. Carroll
Jeremy A. O’Sullivan
Bruce S. Bochner
author_sort Yun Cao
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective Little has been reported regarding the reliability of methods for the purification of human blood eosinophils. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with 350 consecutive eosinophil isolations. Results Between January 2014 and December 2018, we conducted 350 eosinophil purifications from 83 donors. Absolute eosinophil count (AEC), calculated from hospital complete blood counts when available (n = 289), ranged from 32 to 1352 eosinophils/µL ( $$\bar{x} \pm {\text{SD}}$$ x ¯ ± SD : 179 ± 136/µL). Eosinophil yields ranged from 0.4 to 24.4 million cells per 20 mL of blood drawn ( $$\bar{x} \pm {\text{SD}}$$ x ¯ ± SD : 3.1 ± 1.9 million eosinophils) with > 98% purity. Comparing AEC to actual yield, recovery was 87% ± 29% ( $$\bar{x} \pm {\text{SD}}$$ x ¯ ± SD ) and AEC strongly correlated with yield. To explore the reproducibility of yield, a subsequent analysis was limited to those donors drawn ≥ 3 times (N = 35), and there was no difference in the average coefficient of variation for yield between allergic and non-allergic donors. Viability of isolated eosinophils was consistently > 95% and after 24 h of culture did not differ between allergic and non-allergic donors. We conclude that this immunomagnetic separation method for human eosinophil isolation from whole blood is a reliable, reproducible technique for obtaining an average of 87% yield with high purity and viability.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T22:33:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-80104cf7b88a4b85853faa747e97f637
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-0500
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T22:33:28Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Research Notes
spelling doaj.art-80104cf7b88a4b85853faa747e97f6372022-12-22T01:31:00ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002020-04-011311510.1186/s13104-020-05055-9Single-site, five-year experience with human eosinophil isolation by density gradient centrifugation and CD16 immunomagnetic negative separationYun Cao0Sooncheon Shin1Daniela J. Carroll2Jeremy A. O’Sullivan3Bruce S. Bochner4Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineAbstract Objective Little has been reported regarding the reliability of methods for the purification of human blood eosinophils. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with 350 consecutive eosinophil isolations. Results Between January 2014 and December 2018, we conducted 350 eosinophil purifications from 83 donors. Absolute eosinophil count (AEC), calculated from hospital complete blood counts when available (n = 289), ranged from 32 to 1352 eosinophils/µL ( $$\bar{x} \pm {\text{SD}}$$ x ¯ ± SD : 179 ± 136/µL). Eosinophil yields ranged from 0.4 to 24.4 million cells per 20 mL of blood drawn ( $$\bar{x} \pm {\text{SD}}$$ x ¯ ± SD : 3.1 ± 1.9 million eosinophils) with > 98% purity. Comparing AEC to actual yield, recovery was 87% ± 29% ( $$\bar{x} \pm {\text{SD}}$$ x ¯ ± SD ) and AEC strongly correlated with yield. To explore the reproducibility of yield, a subsequent analysis was limited to those donors drawn ≥ 3 times (N = 35), and there was no difference in the average coefficient of variation for yield between allergic and non-allergic donors. Viability of isolated eosinophils was consistently > 95% and after 24 h of culture did not differ between allergic and non-allergic donors. We conclude that this immunomagnetic separation method for human eosinophil isolation from whole blood is a reliable, reproducible technique for obtaining an average of 87% yield with high purity and viability.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-020-05055-9Human eosinophil purificationBloodMethodsPurityYieldImmunomagnetic separation
spellingShingle Yun Cao
Sooncheon Shin
Daniela J. Carroll
Jeremy A. O’Sullivan
Bruce S. Bochner
Single-site, five-year experience with human eosinophil isolation by density gradient centrifugation and CD16 immunomagnetic negative separation
BMC Research Notes
Human eosinophil purification
Blood
Methods
Purity
Yield
Immunomagnetic separation
title Single-site, five-year experience with human eosinophil isolation by density gradient centrifugation and CD16 immunomagnetic negative separation
title_full Single-site, five-year experience with human eosinophil isolation by density gradient centrifugation and CD16 immunomagnetic negative separation
title_fullStr Single-site, five-year experience with human eosinophil isolation by density gradient centrifugation and CD16 immunomagnetic negative separation
title_full_unstemmed Single-site, five-year experience with human eosinophil isolation by density gradient centrifugation and CD16 immunomagnetic negative separation
title_short Single-site, five-year experience with human eosinophil isolation by density gradient centrifugation and CD16 immunomagnetic negative separation
title_sort single site five year experience with human eosinophil isolation by density gradient centrifugation and cd16 immunomagnetic negative separation
topic Human eosinophil purification
Blood
Methods
Purity
Yield
Immunomagnetic separation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-020-05055-9
work_keys_str_mv AT yuncao singlesitefiveyearexperiencewithhumaneosinophilisolationbydensitygradientcentrifugationandcd16immunomagneticnegativeseparation
AT sooncheonshin singlesitefiveyearexperiencewithhumaneosinophilisolationbydensitygradientcentrifugationandcd16immunomagneticnegativeseparation
AT danielajcarroll singlesitefiveyearexperiencewithhumaneosinophilisolationbydensitygradientcentrifugationandcd16immunomagneticnegativeseparation
AT jeremyaosullivan singlesitefiveyearexperiencewithhumaneosinophilisolationbydensitygradientcentrifugationandcd16immunomagneticnegativeseparation
AT brucesbochner singlesitefiveyearexperiencewithhumaneosinophilisolationbydensitygradientcentrifugationandcd16immunomagneticnegativeseparation