Prevalence of cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) among HIV-positive patients in Eswatini, 2014–2015

Background: Cryptococcal meningitis is a leading cause of death amongst people living with HIV. However, routine cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) screening was not in the national guidelines in Eswatini. Objectives: A cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2014 and March 2015 to examine CrAg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samson M. Haumba, Mitsuru Toda, Rossana Jeffries, Peter Ehrenkranz, Munyaradzi Pasipamire, Trong Ao, Nomthandazo Lukhele, Sikhathele Mazibuko, Mandzisi Mkhontfo, Rachel M. Smith, Tom Chiller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2020-07-01
Series:African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/933
_version_ 1828815634556780544
author Samson M. Haumba
Mitsuru Toda
Rossana Jeffries
Peter Ehrenkranz
Munyaradzi Pasipamire
Trong Ao
Nomthandazo Lukhele
Sikhathele Mazibuko
Mandzisi Mkhontfo
Rachel M. Smith
Tom Chiller
author_facet Samson M. Haumba
Mitsuru Toda
Rossana Jeffries
Peter Ehrenkranz
Munyaradzi Pasipamire
Trong Ao
Nomthandazo Lukhele
Sikhathele Mazibuko
Mandzisi Mkhontfo
Rachel M. Smith
Tom Chiller
author_sort Samson M. Haumba
collection DOAJ
description Background: Cryptococcal meningitis is a leading cause of death amongst people living with HIV. However, routine cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) screening was not in the national guidelines in Eswatini. Objectives: A cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2014 and March 2015 to examine CrAg prevalence at Mbabane Government Hospital in Eswatini. Methods: We collected urine and whole blood from antiretroviral-therapy-naïve patients with HIV and a cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) counts 200 cells/mm3 for plasma and urine CrAg lateral flow assay (LFA) screening at the national HIV reference laboratory. Two CD4 cut-off points were used to estimate CrAg prevalence: CD4 100 and 200 cells/mm3. Sensitivity and specificity of urine CrAg LFA was compared to plasma CrAg LFA. Results: Plasma CrAg prevalence was 4% (8/182, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2–8) amongst patients with CD4 counts of 200 cells/mm3, and 8% (8/102, 95% CI: 3–15) amongst patients with CD4 counts of 100 cells/mm3. Urine CrAg LFA had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 59–100) and a specificity of 80% (95% CI: 72–86) compared with plasma CrAg LFA tests for patients with CD4 200 cells/mm3. Forty-three per cent of 99 patients with CD4 100 were at World Health Organization clinical stages I or II. Conclusion: The prevalence of CrAg in Eswatini was higher than the current global estimate of 6% amongst HIV-positive people with CD4 100 cell/mm3, indicating the importance of initiating a national screening programme. Mechanisms for CrAg testing, training, reporting, and drug and commodity supply issues are important considerations before national implementation.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T10:48:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8013ac07720b4c1c9bb1213ac7f1ddb3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2225-2002
2225-2010
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T10:48:13Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
spelling doaj.art-8013ac07720b4c1c9bb1213ac7f1ddb32022-12-22T00:26:50ZengAOSISAfrican Journal of Laboratory Medicine2225-20022225-20102020-07-0191e1e710.4102/ajlm.v9i1.933262Prevalence of cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) among HIV-positive patients in Eswatini, 2014–2015Samson M. Haumba0Mitsuru Toda1Rossana Jeffries2Peter Ehrenkranz3Munyaradzi Pasipamire4Trong Ao5Nomthandazo Lukhele6Sikhathele Mazibuko7Mandzisi Mkhontfo8Rachel M. Smith9Tom Chiller10University Research Co., LLC, MbabaneEpidemic Intelligence Service (EIS), Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (CSELS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, United States; and, Mycotic Diseases Branch (MDB), Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Disease (DFWED), National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GeorgiaUniversity Research Co., LLC, MbabaneGlobal Development, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WashingtonMinistry of Health Eswatini National AIDS Programme (ENAP), MbabaneCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), MbabaneMinistry of Health Eswatini National AIDS Programme (ENAP), MbabaneMinistry of Health Eswatini National AIDS Programme (ENAP), MbabaneUniversity Research Co., LLC, MbabaneMycotic Diseases Branch (MDB), Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Disease (DFWED), National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GeorgiaMycotic Diseases Branch (MDB), Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Disease (DFWED), National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GeorgiaBackground: Cryptococcal meningitis is a leading cause of death amongst people living with HIV. However, routine cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) screening was not in the national guidelines in Eswatini. Objectives: A cross-sectional study was conducted between August 2014 and March 2015 to examine CrAg prevalence at Mbabane Government Hospital in Eswatini. Methods: We collected urine and whole blood from antiretroviral-therapy-naïve patients with HIV and a cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) counts 200 cells/mm3 for plasma and urine CrAg lateral flow assay (LFA) screening at the national HIV reference laboratory. Two CD4 cut-off points were used to estimate CrAg prevalence: CD4 100 and 200 cells/mm3. Sensitivity and specificity of urine CrAg LFA was compared to plasma CrAg LFA. Results: Plasma CrAg prevalence was 4% (8/182, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2–8) amongst patients with CD4 counts of 200 cells/mm3, and 8% (8/102, 95% CI: 3–15) amongst patients with CD4 counts of 100 cells/mm3. Urine CrAg LFA had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 59–100) and a specificity of 80% (95% CI: 72–86) compared with plasma CrAg LFA tests for patients with CD4 200 cells/mm3. Forty-three per cent of 99 patients with CD4 100 were at World Health Organization clinical stages I or II. Conclusion: The prevalence of CrAg in Eswatini was higher than the current global estimate of 6% amongst HIV-positive people with CD4 100 cell/mm3, indicating the importance of initiating a national screening programme. Mechanisms for CrAg testing, training, reporting, and drug and commodity supply issues are important considerations before national implementation.https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/933cryptococcal antigenaemia screeningprevalencepeople living with hivcryptococcal meningitisadvanced hiv disease packageeswatini
spellingShingle Samson M. Haumba
Mitsuru Toda
Rossana Jeffries
Peter Ehrenkranz
Munyaradzi Pasipamire
Trong Ao
Nomthandazo Lukhele
Sikhathele Mazibuko
Mandzisi Mkhontfo
Rachel M. Smith
Tom Chiller
Prevalence of cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) among HIV-positive patients in Eswatini, 2014–2015
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
cryptococcal antigenaemia screening
prevalence
people living with hiv
cryptococcal meningitis
advanced hiv disease package
eswatini
title Prevalence of cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) among HIV-positive patients in Eswatini, 2014–2015
title_full Prevalence of cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) among HIV-positive patients in Eswatini, 2014–2015
title_fullStr Prevalence of cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) among HIV-positive patients in Eswatini, 2014–2015
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) among HIV-positive patients in Eswatini, 2014–2015
title_short Prevalence of cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) among HIV-positive patients in Eswatini, 2014–2015
title_sort prevalence of cryptococcal antigen crag among hiv positive patients in eswatini 2014 2015
topic cryptococcal antigenaemia screening
prevalence
people living with hiv
cryptococcal meningitis
advanced hiv disease package
eswatini
url https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/933
work_keys_str_mv AT samsonmhaumba prevalenceofcryptococcalantigencragamonghivpositivepatientsineswatini20142015
AT mitsurutoda prevalenceofcryptococcalantigencragamonghivpositivepatientsineswatini20142015
AT rossanajeffries prevalenceofcryptococcalantigencragamonghivpositivepatientsineswatini20142015
AT peterehrenkranz prevalenceofcryptococcalantigencragamonghivpositivepatientsineswatini20142015
AT munyaradzipasipamire prevalenceofcryptococcalantigencragamonghivpositivepatientsineswatini20142015
AT trongao prevalenceofcryptococcalantigencragamonghivpositivepatientsineswatini20142015
AT nomthandazolukhele prevalenceofcryptococcalantigencragamonghivpositivepatientsineswatini20142015
AT sikhathelemazibuko prevalenceofcryptococcalantigencragamonghivpositivepatientsineswatini20142015
AT mandzisimkhontfo prevalenceofcryptococcalantigencragamonghivpositivepatientsineswatini20142015
AT rachelmsmith prevalenceofcryptococcalantigencragamonghivpositivepatientsineswatini20142015
AT tomchiller prevalenceofcryptococcalantigencragamonghivpositivepatientsineswatini20142015