Number of Days Required to Estimate Habitual Activity Using Wrist-Worn GENEActiv Accelerometer: A Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION:Objective methods like accelerometers are feasible for large studies and may quantify variability in day-to-day physical activity better than self-report. The variability between days suggests that day of the week cannot be ignored in the design and analysis of physical activity studies...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christina B Dillon, Anthony P Fitzgerald, Patricia M Kearney, Ivan J Perry, Kirsten L Rennie, Robert Kozarski, Catherine M Phillips
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4858250?pdf=render
_version_ 1811321983296602112
author Christina B Dillon
Anthony P Fitzgerald
Patricia M Kearney
Ivan J Perry
Kirsten L Rennie
Robert Kozarski
Catherine M Phillips
author_facet Christina B Dillon
Anthony P Fitzgerald
Patricia M Kearney
Ivan J Perry
Kirsten L Rennie
Robert Kozarski
Catherine M Phillips
author_sort Christina B Dillon
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION:Objective methods like accelerometers are feasible for large studies and may quantify variability in day-to-day physical activity better than self-report. The variability between days suggests that day of the week cannot be ignored in the design and analysis of physical activity studies. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the optimal number of days needed to obtain reliable estimates of weekly habitual physical activity using the wrist-worn GENEActiv accelerometer. METHODS:Data are from a subsample of the Mitchelstown cohort; 475 (44.6% males; mean aged 59.6±5.5 years) middle-aged Irish adults. Participants wore the wrist GENEActiv accelerometer for 7-consecutive days. Data were collected at 100Hz and summarised into a signal magnitude vector using 60s epochs. Each time interval was categorised according to intensity based on validated cut-offs. Spearman pairwise correlations determined the association between days of the week. Repeated measures ANOVA examined differences in average minutes across days. Intraclass correlations examined the proportion of variability between days, and Spearman-Brown formula estimated intra-class reliability coefficient associated with combinations of 1-7 days. RESULTS:Three hundred and ninety-seven adults (59.7±5.5yrs) had valid accelerometer data. Overall, men were most sedentary on weekends while women spent more time in sedentary behaviour on Sunday through Tuesday. Post hoc analysis found sedentary behaviour and light activity levels on Sunday to differ to all other days in the week. Analysis revealed greater than 1 day monitoring is necessary to achieve acceptable reliability. Monitoring frame duration for reliable estimates varied across intensity categories, (sedentary (3 days), light (2 days), moderate (2 days) and vigorous activity (6 days) and MVPA (2 days)). CONCLUSION:These findings provide knowledge into the behavioural variability in weekly activity patterns of middle-aged adults. Since Sunday differed from all other days in the week this suggests that day of the week cannot be overlooked in the design and analysis of physical activity studies and thus should be included in the study monitoring frames. Collectively our data suggest that six days monitoring, inclusive of Saturday and Sunday, are needed to reliably capture weekly habitual activity in all activity intensities using the wrist-worn GENEActiv accelerometer.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T13:27:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-801ce06f7e564b5c87373e053540982c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T13:27:09Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-801ce06f7e564b5c87373e053540982c2022-12-22T02:45:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01115e010991310.1371/journal.pone.0109913Number of Days Required to Estimate Habitual Activity Using Wrist-Worn GENEActiv Accelerometer: A Cross-Sectional Study.Christina B DillonAnthony P FitzgeraldPatricia M KearneyIvan J PerryKirsten L RennieRobert KozarskiCatherine M PhillipsINTRODUCTION:Objective methods like accelerometers are feasible for large studies and may quantify variability in day-to-day physical activity better than self-report. The variability between days suggests that day of the week cannot be ignored in the design and analysis of physical activity studies. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the optimal number of days needed to obtain reliable estimates of weekly habitual physical activity using the wrist-worn GENEActiv accelerometer. METHODS:Data are from a subsample of the Mitchelstown cohort; 475 (44.6% males; mean aged 59.6±5.5 years) middle-aged Irish adults. Participants wore the wrist GENEActiv accelerometer for 7-consecutive days. Data were collected at 100Hz and summarised into a signal magnitude vector using 60s epochs. Each time interval was categorised according to intensity based on validated cut-offs. Spearman pairwise correlations determined the association between days of the week. Repeated measures ANOVA examined differences in average minutes across days. Intraclass correlations examined the proportion of variability between days, and Spearman-Brown formula estimated intra-class reliability coefficient associated with combinations of 1-7 days. RESULTS:Three hundred and ninety-seven adults (59.7±5.5yrs) had valid accelerometer data. Overall, men were most sedentary on weekends while women spent more time in sedentary behaviour on Sunday through Tuesday. Post hoc analysis found sedentary behaviour and light activity levels on Sunday to differ to all other days in the week. Analysis revealed greater than 1 day monitoring is necessary to achieve acceptable reliability. Monitoring frame duration for reliable estimates varied across intensity categories, (sedentary (3 days), light (2 days), moderate (2 days) and vigorous activity (6 days) and MVPA (2 days)). CONCLUSION:These findings provide knowledge into the behavioural variability in weekly activity patterns of middle-aged adults. Since Sunday differed from all other days in the week this suggests that day of the week cannot be overlooked in the design and analysis of physical activity studies and thus should be included in the study monitoring frames. Collectively our data suggest that six days monitoring, inclusive of Saturday and Sunday, are needed to reliably capture weekly habitual activity in all activity intensities using the wrist-worn GENEActiv accelerometer.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4858250?pdf=render
spellingShingle Christina B Dillon
Anthony P Fitzgerald
Patricia M Kearney
Ivan J Perry
Kirsten L Rennie
Robert Kozarski
Catherine M Phillips
Number of Days Required to Estimate Habitual Activity Using Wrist-Worn GENEActiv Accelerometer: A Cross-Sectional Study.
PLoS ONE
title Number of Days Required to Estimate Habitual Activity Using Wrist-Worn GENEActiv Accelerometer: A Cross-Sectional Study.
title_full Number of Days Required to Estimate Habitual Activity Using Wrist-Worn GENEActiv Accelerometer: A Cross-Sectional Study.
title_fullStr Number of Days Required to Estimate Habitual Activity Using Wrist-Worn GENEActiv Accelerometer: A Cross-Sectional Study.
title_full_unstemmed Number of Days Required to Estimate Habitual Activity Using Wrist-Worn GENEActiv Accelerometer: A Cross-Sectional Study.
title_short Number of Days Required to Estimate Habitual Activity Using Wrist-Worn GENEActiv Accelerometer: A Cross-Sectional Study.
title_sort number of days required to estimate habitual activity using wrist worn geneactiv accelerometer a cross sectional study
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4858250?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT christinabdillon numberofdaysrequiredtoestimatehabitualactivityusingwristworngeneactivaccelerometeracrosssectionalstudy
AT anthonypfitzgerald numberofdaysrequiredtoestimatehabitualactivityusingwristworngeneactivaccelerometeracrosssectionalstudy
AT patriciamkearney numberofdaysrequiredtoestimatehabitualactivityusingwristworngeneactivaccelerometeracrosssectionalstudy
AT ivanjperry numberofdaysrequiredtoestimatehabitualactivityusingwristworngeneactivaccelerometeracrosssectionalstudy
AT kirstenlrennie numberofdaysrequiredtoestimatehabitualactivityusingwristworngeneactivaccelerometeracrosssectionalstudy
AT robertkozarski numberofdaysrequiredtoestimatehabitualactivityusingwristworngeneactivaccelerometeracrosssectionalstudy
AT catherinemphillips numberofdaysrequiredtoestimatehabitualactivityusingwristworngeneactivaccelerometeracrosssectionalstudy