Models of experimentally derived competitive effects predict biogeographical differences in the abundance of invasive and native plant species.

Mono-dominance by invasive species provides opportunities to explore determinants of plant distributions and abundance; however, linking mechanistic results from small scale experiments to patterns in nature is difficult. We used experimentally derived competitive effects of an invader in North Amer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sa Xiao, Guangyan Ni, Ragan M Callaway
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3827048?pdf=render
_version_ 1811194697336487936
author Sa Xiao
Guangyan Ni
Ragan M Callaway
author_facet Sa Xiao
Guangyan Ni
Ragan M Callaway
author_sort Sa Xiao
collection DOAJ
description Mono-dominance by invasive species provides opportunities to explore determinants of plant distributions and abundance; however, linking mechanistic results from small scale experiments to patterns in nature is difficult. We used experimentally derived competitive effects of an invader in North America, Acroptilon repens, on species with which it co-occurs in its native range of Uzbekistan and on species with which it occurs in its non-native ranges in North America, in individual-based models. We found that competitive effects yielded relative abundances of Acroptilon and other species in models that were qualitatively similar to those observed in the field in the two ranges. In its non-native range, Acroptilon can occur in nearly pure monocultures at local scales, whereas such nearly pure stands of Acroptilon appear to be much less common in its native range. Experimentally derived competitive effects of Acroptilon on other species predicted Acroptilon to be 4-9 times more proportionally abundant than natives in the North American models, but proportionally equal to or less than the abundance of natives in the Eurasian models. Our results suggest a novel way to integrate complex combinations of interactions simultaneously, and that biogeographical differences in the competitive effects of an invader correspond well with biogeographical differences in abundance and impact.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:31:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-802542a9674f492f881d4d85efe50c1a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:31:02Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-802542a9674f492f881d4d85efe50c1a2022-12-22T03:55:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01811e7862510.1371/journal.pone.0078625Models of experimentally derived competitive effects predict biogeographical differences in the abundance of invasive and native plant species.Sa XiaoGuangyan NiRagan M CallawayMono-dominance by invasive species provides opportunities to explore determinants of plant distributions and abundance; however, linking mechanistic results from small scale experiments to patterns in nature is difficult. We used experimentally derived competitive effects of an invader in North America, Acroptilon repens, on species with which it co-occurs in its native range of Uzbekistan and on species with which it occurs in its non-native ranges in North America, in individual-based models. We found that competitive effects yielded relative abundances of Acroptilon and other species in models that were qualitatively similar to those observed in the field in the two ranges. In its non-native range, Acroptilon can occur in nearly pure monocultures at local scales, whereas such nearly pure stands of Acroptilon appear to be much less common in its native range. Experimentally derived competitive effects of Acroptilon on other species predicted Acroptilon to be 4-9 times more proportionally abundant than natives in the North American models, but proportionally equal to or less than the abundance of natives in the Eurasian models. Our results suggest a novel way to integrate complex combinations of interactions simultaneously, and that biogeographical differences in the competitive effects of an invader correspond well with biogeographical differences in abundance and impact.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3827048?pdf=render
spellingShingle Sa Xiao
Guangyan Ni
Ragan M Callaway
Models of experimentally derived competitive effects predict biogeographical differences in the abundance of invasive and native plant species.
PLoS ONE
title Models of experimentally derived competitive effects predict biogeographical differences in the abundance of invasive and native plant species.
title_full Models of experimentally derived competitive effects predict biogeographical differences in the abundance of invasive and native plant species.
title_fullStr Models of experimentally derived competitive effects predict biogeographical differences in the abundance of invasive and native plant species.
title_full_unstemmed Models of experimentally derived competitive effects predict biogeographical differences in the abundance of invasive and native plant species.
title_short Models of experimentally derived competitive effects predict biogeographical differences in the abundance of invasive and native plant species.
title_sort models of experimentally derived competitive effects predict biogeographical differences in the abundance of invasive and native plant species
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3827048?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT saxiao modelsofexperimentallyderivedcompetitiveeffectspredictbiogeographicaldifferencesintheabundanceofinvasiveandnativeplantspecies
AT guangyanni modelsofexperimentallyderivedcompetitiveeffectspredictbiogeographicaldifferencesintheabundanceofinvasiveandnativeplantspecies
AT raganmcallaway modelsofexperimentallyderivedcompetitiveeffectspredictbiogeographicaldifferencesintheabundanceofinvasiveandnativeplantspecies