Rewriting, new drafts, new editions: authorial and ecdotic practices
The lexicon about ‘rewriting’, usually employed by Italian scholars, is not shared by all them: in fact, terms such as ‘redazione’, ‘stesura’, ‘revisione’, ‘rielaborazione’, ‘rifacimento’, can be used to denote both similar and completely different case-studies or concepts. The aim of this paper is...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Italian |
Published: |
Milano University Press
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Prassi Ecdotiche della Modernità Letteraria |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/PEML/article/view/11699 |
_version_ | 1797282499846471680 |
---|---|
author | Maria Rita Mastropaolo |
author_facet | Maria Rita Mastropaolo |
author_sort | Maria Rita Mastropaolo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The lexicon about ‘rewriting’, usually employed by Italian scholars, is not shared by all them: in fact, terms such as ‘redazione’, ‘stesura’, ‘revisione’, ‘rielaborazione’, ‘rifacimento’, can be used to denote both similar and completely different case-studies or concepts. The aim of this paper is to elucidate this complex situation by means of two case studies and the terminology used in the field of library sciences. We also suggest some possible solutions to this vagueness, trying to identify the liaison points between theoretical studies, editorial criteria and author’s choice. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T17:13:56Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-802ba95af22944d79a0da5100e95050d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2499-6637 |
language | Italian |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T17:13:56Z |
publishDate | 2019-04-01 |
publisher | Milano University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Prassi Ecdotiche della Modernità Letteraria |
spelling | doaj.art-802ba95af22944d79a0da5100e95050d2024-03-02T23:40:05ZitaMilano University PressPrassi Ecdotiche della Modernità Letteraria2499-66372019-04-0104/I15718310.13130/2499-6637/116999943Rewriting, new drafts, new editions: authorial and ecdotic practicesMaria Rita Mastropaolo0Università degli Studi di MilanoThe lexicon about ‘rewriting’, usually employed by Italian scholars, is not shared by all them: in fact, terms such as ‘redazione’, ‘stesura’, ‘revisione’, ‘rielaborazione’, ‘rifacimento’, can be used to denote both similar and completely different case-studies or concepts. The aim of this paper is to elucidate this complex situation by means of two case studies and the terminology used in the field of library sciences. We also suggest some possible solutions to this vagueness, trying to identify the liaison points between theoretical studies, editorial criteria and author’s choice.https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/PEML/article/view/11699riscritturastesurarevisioneredazioneterminologia filologicaPasqualiContiniFolenaCarettiDe RobertisElio VittoriniGesualdo Bufalino |
spellingShingle | Maria Rita Mastropaolo Rewriting, new drafts, new editions: authorial and ecdotic practices Prassi Ecdotiche della Modernità Letteraria riscrittura stesura revisione redazione terminologia filologica Pasquali Contini Folena Caretti De Robertis Elio Vittorini Gesualdo Bufalino |
title | Rewriting, new drafts, new editions: authorial and ecdotic practices |
title_full | Rewriting, new drafts, new editions: authorial and ecdotic practices |
title_fullStr | Rewriting, new drafts, new editions: authorial and ecdotic practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Rewriting, new drafts, new editions: authorial and ecdotic practices |
title_short | Rewriting, new drafts, new editions: authorial and ecdotic practices |
title_sort | rewriting new drafts new editions authorial and ecdotic practices |
topic | riscrittura stesura revisione redazione terminologia filologica Pasquali Contini Folena Caretti De Robertis Elio Vittorini Gesualdo Bufalino |
url | https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/PEML/article/view/11699 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mariaritamastropaolo rewritingnewdraftsneweditionsauthorialandecdoticpractices |