Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight

Abstract Background Pilots must process multiple streams of information simultaneously. Mental workload is one of the main issues in man–machine interactive mode when dealing with multiple tasks. This study aimed to combine functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electrocardiogram (ECG) to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wenbin Li, Rong Li, Xiaoping Xie, Yaoming Chang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-04-01
Series:Brain and Behavior
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2489
_version_ 1827860765004005376
author Wenbin Li
Rong Li
Xiaoping Xie
Yaoming Chang
author_facet Wenbin Li
Rong Li
Xiaoping Xie
Yaoming Chang
author_sort Wenbin Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Pilots must process multiple streams of information simultaneously. Mental workload is one of the main issues in man–machine interactive mode when dealing with multiple tasks. This study aimed to combine functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electrocardiogram (ECG) to detect changes in mental workload during multitasking in a simulated flight. Methods Twenty‐six participants performed three multitasking tasks at different mental workload levels. These mental workload levels were set by varying the number of subtasks. fNIRS and ECG signals were recorded during tasks. Participants filled in the national aeronautics and space administration task load index (NASA‐TLX) scale after each task. The effects of mental workload on scores of NASA‐TLX, performance of tasks, heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), and the prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation were analyzed. Results Compared to multitasking in lower mental workload conditions, participants exhibited higher scores of NASA‐TLX, HR, and PFC activation when multitasking in high mental workload conditions. Their performance was worse during the high mental workload multitasking condition, as evidenced by the higher average tracking distance, smaller number of response times, and longer response time of the meter. The standard deviation of the RR intervals (SDNN) was negatively correlated with subjective mental workload in the low task load condition and PFC activation was positively correlated with HR and subjective mental workload in the medium task load condition. Conclusion HR and PFC activation can be used to detect changes in mental workload during simulated flight multitasking tasks.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T13:26:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8040b2453af041079fb6a0077e497d13
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2162-3279
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T13:26:34Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Brain and Behavior
spelling doaj.art-8040b2453af041079fb6a0077e497d132023-08-25T04:42:41ZengWileyBrain and Behavior2162-32792022-04-01124n/an/a10.1002/brb3.2489Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flightWenbin Li0Rong Li1Xiaoping Xie2Yaoming Chang3Department of Aerospace Hygiene Faculty of Aerospace Medicine Air Force Medical University Xi'an Shaanxi P. R. ChinaDepartment of Internal Medicine Faculty of Clinical Medicine Xi'an Medical University Xi'an Shaanxi P. R. ChinaDepartment of Aerospace Hygiene Faculty of Aerospace Medicine Air Force Medical University Xi'an Shaanxi P. R. ChinaDepartment of Aerospace Hygiene Faculty of Aerospace Medicine Air Force Medical University Xi'an Shaanxi P. R. ChinaAbstract Background Pilots must process multiple streams of information simultaneously. Mental workload is one of the main issues in man–machine interactive mode when dealing with multiple tasks. This study aimed to combine functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electrocardiogram (ECG) to detect changes in mental workload during multitasking in a simulated flight. Methods Twenty‐six participants performed three multitasking tasks at different mental workload levels. These mental workload levels were set by varying the number of subtasks. fNIRS and ECG signals were recorded during tasks. Participants filled in the national aeronautics and space administration task load index (NASA‐TLX) scale after each task. The effects of mental workload on scores of NASA‐TLX, performance of tasks, heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), and the prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation were analyzed. Results Compared to multitasking in lower mental workload conditions, participants exhibited higher scores of NASA‐TLX, HR, and PFC activation when multitasking in high mental workload conditions. Their performance was worse during the high mental workload multitasking condition, as evidenced by the higher average tracking distance, smaller number of response times, and longer response time of the meter. The standard deviation of the RR intervals (SDNN) was negatively correlated with subjective mental workload in the low task load condition and PFC activation was positively correlated with HR and subjective mental workload in the medium task load condition. Conclusion HR and PFC activation can be used to detect changes in mental workload during simulated flight multitasking tasks.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2489flightfNIRSheart rate variabilitymental workloadmultitasking
spellingShingle Wenbin Li
Rong Li
Xiaoping Xie
Yaoming Chang
Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight
Brain and Behavior
flight
fNIRS
heart rate variability
mental workload
multitasking
title Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight
title_full Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight
title_fullStr Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight
title_short Evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight
title_sort evaluating mental workload during multitasking in simulated flight
topic flight
fNIRS
heart rate variability
mental workload
multitasking
url https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2489
work_keys_str_mv AT wenbinli evaluatingmentalworkloadduringmultitaskinginsimulatedflight
AT rongli evaluatingmentalworkloadduringmultitaskinginsimulatedflight
AT xiaopingxie evaluatingmentalworkloadduringmultitaskinginsimulatedflight
AT yaomingchang evaluatingmentalworkloadduringmultitaskinginsimulatedflight