Twelve-Year Outcomes of Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft versus Intraoperative Mitomycin C in Double-Head Pterygium Surgery

Purpose. The study aims to compare the long-term outcome of conjunctival autograft (CAU) and mitomycin C (MMC) in double-head pterygium surgery. Methods. This is a follow-up study of a comparative interventional trial. Thirty-nine eyes of the 36 patients with double-head pterygium excision in the or...

Cijeli opis

Bibliografski detalji
Glavni autori: Tommy C. Y. Chan, Raymond L. M. Wong, Emmy Y. M. Li, Hunter K. L. Yuen, Emily F. Y. Yeung, Vishal Jhanji, Ian Y. H. Wong
Format: Članak
Jezik:English
Izdano: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Serija:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online pristup:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/891582
_version_ 1827006671340175360
author Tommy C. Y. Chan
Raymond L. M. Wong
Emmy Y. M. Li
Hunter K. L. Yuen
Emily F. Y. Yeung
Vishal Jhanji
Ian Y. H. Wong
author_facet Tommy C. Y. Chan
Raymond L. M. Wong
Emmy Y. M. Li
Hunter K. L. Yuen
Emily F. Y. Yeung
Vishal Jhanji
Ian Y. H. Wong
author_sort Tommy C. Y. Chan
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. The study aims to compare the long-term outcome of conjunctival autograft (CAU) and mitomycin C (MMC) in double-head pterygium surgery. Methods. This is a follow-up study of a comparative interventional trial. Thirty-nine eyes of the 36 patients with double-head pterygium excision in the original study 12 years ago were recruited for clinical assessment. Seven out of the 36 patients were lost. In the original study, each eye with double-head pterygium was randomized to have pterygium excision with CAU on one “head” (temporal or nasal) and MMC on the other “head.” All patients were invited for clinical assessment for conjunctival bed status and the presence of pterygium recurrence in the current study. Results. There was no significant difference between the size, morphology, and type of pterygium among the two treatment groups. The recurrence rate of CAU group and MMC group 12 years after excision was 6.3% and 28.1%, respectively (P=0.020). Among eyes without recurrence, the conjunctival bed was graded higher in the MMC group than the CAU group (P=0.024). Conclusion. The use of conjunctival autograft has a significantly lower long-term recurrence rate than mitomycin C in double-head pterygium surgery.
first_indexed 2025-02-18T12:07:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8044c61ed26a42b7abae57a4aa55b51d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-18T12:07:44Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Hindawi Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-8044c61ed26a42b7abae57a4aa55b51d2024-11-02T05:08:22ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582015-01-01201510.1155/2015/891582891582Twelve-Year Outcomes of Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft versus Intraoperative Mitomycin C in Double-Head Pterygium SurgeryTommy C. Y. Chan0Raymond L. M. Wong1Emmy Y. M. Li2Hunter K. L. Yuen3Emily F. Y. Yeung4Vishal Jhanji5Ian Y. H. Wong6Hong Kong Eye Hospital, 147K Argyle Street, Kowloon, Hong KongHong Kong Eye Hospital, 147K Argyle Street, Kowloon, Hong KongHong Kong Eye Hospital, 147K Argyle Street, Kowloon, Hong KongHong Kong Eye Hospital, 147K Argyle Street, Kowloon, Hong KongHong Kong Eye Hospital, 147K Argyle Street, Kowloon, Hong KongDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong KongDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong KongPurpose. The study aims to compare the long-term outcome of conjunctival autograft (CAU) and mitomycin C (MMC) in double-head pterygium surgery. Methods. This is a follow-up study of a comparative interventional trial. Thirty-nine eyes of the 36 patients with double-head pterygium excision in the original study 12 years ago were recruited for clinical assessment. Seven out of the 36 patients were lost. In the original study, each eye with double-head pterygium was randomized to have pterygium excision with CAU on one “head” (temporal or nasal) and MMC on the other “head.” All patients were invited for clinical assessment for conjunctival bed status and the presence of pterygium recurrence in the current study. Results. There was no significant difference between the size, morphology, and type of pterygium among the two treatment groups. The recurrence rate of CAU group and MMC group 12 years after excision was 6.3% and 28.1%, respectively (P=0.020). Among eyes without recurrence, the conjunctival bed was graded higher in the MMC group than the CAU group (P=0.024). Conclusion. The use of conjunctival autograft has a significantly lower long-term recurrence rate than mitomycin C in double-head pterygium surgery.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/891582
spellingShingle Tommy C. Y. Chan
Raymond L. M. Wong
Emmy Y. M. Li
Hunter K. L. Yuen
Emily F. Y. Yeung
Vishal Jhanji
Ian Y. H. Wong
Twelve-Year Outcomes of Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft versus Intraoperative Mitomycin C in Double-Head Pterygium Surgery
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Twelve-Year Outcomes of Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft versus Intraoperative Mitomycin C in Double-Head Pterygium Surgery
title_full Twelve-Year Outcomes of Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft versus Intraoperative Mitomycin C in Double-Head Pterygium Surgery
title_fullStr Twelve-Year Outcomes of Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft versus Intraoperative Mitomycin C in Double-Head Pterygium Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Twelve-Year Outcomes of Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft versus Intraoperative Mitomycin C in Double-Head Pterygium Surgery
title_short Twelve-Year Outcomes of Pterygium Excision with Conjunctival Autograft versus Intraoperative Mitomycin C in Double-Head Pterygium Surgery
title_sort twelve year outcomes of pterygium excision with conjunctival autograft versus intraoperative mitomycin c in double head pterygium surgery
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/891582
work_keys_str_mv AT tommycychan twelveyearoutcomesofpterygiumexcisionwithconjunctivalautograftversusintraoperativemitomycincindoubleheadpterygiumsurgery
AT raymondlmwong twelveyearoutcomesofpterygiumexcisionwithconjunctivalautograftversusintraoperativemitomycincindoubleheadpterygiumsurgery
AT emmyymli twelveyearoutcomesofpterygiumexcisionwithconjunctivalautograftversusintraoperativemitomycincindoubleheadpterygiumsurgery
AT hunterklyuen twelveyearoutcomesofpterygiumexcisionwithconjunctivalautograftversusintraoperativemitomycincindoubleheadpterygiumsurgery
AT emilyfyyeung twelveyearoutcomesofpterygiumexcisionwithconjunctivalautograftversusintraoperativemitomycincindoubleheadpterygiumsurgery
AT vishaljhanji twelveyearoutcomesofpterygiumexcisionwithconjunctivalautograftversusintraoperativemitomycincindoubleheadpterygiumsurgery
AT ianyhwong twelveyearoutcomesofpterygiumexcisionwithconjunctivalautograftversusintraoperativemitomycincindoubleheadpterygiumsurgery