Biomechanical Behavior of Dynamic vs. Static Distal Locking Intramedullary Nails in Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures

Objective: Hip fractures are one of the most frequent fractures presenting to the emergency department and orthopedic trauma teams. The aim of this study was to determine the best indication and therapeutic technique for subtrochanteric fractures and unifying criteria when choosing the most suitable...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carmen Martínez-Aznar, Jesús Mateo, Elena Ibarz, Luis Gracia, Jorge Rosell, Sergio Puértolas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:Bioengineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/10/10/1179
_version_ 1797574666251927552
author Carmen Martínez-Aznar
Jesús Mateo
Elena Ibarz
Luis Gracia
Jorge Rosell
Sergio Puértolas
author_facet Carmen Martínez-Aznar
Jesús Mateo
Elena Ibarz
Luis Gracia
Jorge Rosell
Sergio Puértolas
author_sort Carmen Martínez-Aznar
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Hip fractures are one of the most frequent fractures presenting to the emergency department and orthopedic trauma teams. The aim of this study was to determine the best indication and therapeutic technique for subtrochanteric fractures and unifying criteria when choosing the most suitable type of nail. Materials and methods: To analyze the influence of the material and the type of distal locking of intramedullary nails (static or dynamic), a femur model with a fracture in the subtrochanteric region stabilized with a long Gamma intramedullary nail was applied using finite element method (FEM) simulation. Results: The mechanical study shows that titanium nails allow for greater micromobility at the fracture site, which could act as a stimulus for the formation of callus and consolidation of the fracture. In the mechanical study, the type of distal locking mainly affects mobility at the fracture site and stress in the cortical bone around the distal screws, without in any case exceeding values that may compromise the viability of the assembly or that may result in detrimental effects (in terms of mobility at the fracture site) for the consolidation process. Conclusion: Subtrochanteric fractures treated with titanium nail and static distal locking is safe and does not hinder consolidation.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T21:25:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-80525839c583405d905e9b123590da58
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2306-5354
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T21:25:33Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Bioengineering
spelling doaj.art-80525839c583405d905e9b123590da582023-11-19T15:42:07ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542023-10-011010117910.3390/bioengineering10101179Biomechanical Behavior of Dynamic vs. Static Distal Locking Intramedullary Nails in Subtrochanteric Femur FracturesCarmen Martínez-Aznar0Jesús Mateo1Elena Ibarz2Luis Gracia3Jorge Rosell4Sergio Puértolas5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Reina Sofía Hospital, 31500 Tudela, SpainDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, SpainDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, SpainDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, SpainDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, SpainDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, SpainObjective: Hip fractures are one of the most frequent fractures presenting to the emergency department and orthopedic trauma teams. The aim of this study was to determine the best indication and therapeutic technique for subtrochanteric fractures and unifying criteria when choosing the most suitable type of nail. Materials and methods: To analyze the influence of the material and the type of distal locking of intramedullary nails (static or dynamic), a femur model with a fracture in the subtrochanteric region stabilized with a long Gamma intramedullary nail was applied using finite element method (FEM) simulation. Results: The mechanical study shows that titanium nails allow for greater micromobility at the fracture site, which could act as a stimulus for the formation of callus and consolidation of the fracture. In the mechanical study, the type of distal locking mainly affects mobility at the fracture site and stress in the cortical bone around the distal screws, without in any case exceeding values that may compromise the viability of the assembly or that may result in detrimental effects (in terms of mobility at the fracture site) for the consolidation process. Conclusion: Subtrochanteric fractures treated with titanium nail and static distal locking is safe and does not hinder consolidation.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/10/10/1179intramedullary nailsubtrochanteric fractureosteosynthesisfinite element analysisbiomechanics
spellingShingle Carmen Martínez-Aznar
Jesús Mateo
Elena Ibarz
Luis Gracia
Jorge Rosell
Sergio Puértolas
Biomechanical Behavior of Dynamic vs. Static Distal Locking Intramedullary Nails in Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures
Bioengineering
intramedullary nail
subtrochanteric fracture
osteosynthesis
finite element analysis
biomechanics
title Biomechanical Behavior of Dynamic vs. Static Distal Locking Intramedullary Nails in Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures
title_full Biomechanical Behavior of Dynamic vs. Static Distal Locking Intramedullary Nails in Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures
title_fullStr Biomechanical Behavior of Dynamic vs. Static Distal Locking Intramedullary Nails in Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Behavior of Dynamic vs. Static Distal Locking Intramedullary Nails in Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures
title_short Biomechanical Behavior of Dynamic vs. Static Distal Locking Intramedullary Nails in Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures
title_sort biomechanical behavior of dynamic vs static distal locking intramedullary nails in subtrochanteric femur fractures
topic intramedullary nail
subtrochanteric fracture
osteosynthesis
finite element analysis
biomechanics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/10/10/1179
work_keys_str_mv AT carmenmartinezaznar biomechanicalbehaviorofdynamicvsstaticdistallockingintramedullarynailsinsubtrochantericfemurfractures
AT jesusmateo biomechanicalbehaviorofdynamicvsstaticdistallockingintramedullarynailsinsubtrochantericfemurfractures
AT elenaibarz biomechanicalbehaviorofdynamicvsstaticdistallockingintramedullarynailsinsubtrochantericfemurfractures
AT luisgracia biomechanicalbehaviorofdynamicvsstaticdistallockingintramedullarynailsinsubtrochantericfemurfractures
AT jorgerosell biomechanicalbehaviorofdynamicvsstaticdistallockingintramedullarynailsinsubtrochantericfemurfractures
AT sergiopuertolas biomechanicalbehaviorofdynamicvsstaticdistallockingintramedullarynailsinsubtrochantericfemurfractures