The impact of referral letter quality on timely access to specialised mental health care: a quantitative study of the reliability of patient triage

Abstract Background Patients referred to specialised mental health care are usually triaged based on referral information provided by general practitioners. However, knowledge about this system’s ability to ensure timely access to and equity in specialised mental health care is limited. We aimed to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marit Nymoen, Eva Biringer, Øystein Hetlevik, Olav Thorsen, Jörg Assmus, Miriam Hartveit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-06-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08139-3
_version_ 1828792787740393472
author Marit Nymoen
Eva Biringer
Øystein Hetlevik
Olav Thorsen
Jörg Assmus
Miriam Hartveit
author_facet Marit Nymoen
Eva Biringer
Øystein Hetlevik
Olav Thorsen
Jörg Assmus
Miriam Hartveit
author_sort Marit Nymoen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Patients referred to specialised mental health care are usually triaged based on referral information provided by general practitioners. However, knowledge about this system’s ability to ensure timely access to and equity in specialised mental health care is limited. We aimed to investigate to the degree to which patient triage, based on referral letter information, corresponds to triage based on a hospital specialist’s consultation with the patient, and whether the degree of correspondence is affected by the quality of the referral letter. Methods We gathered information from three specialised mental health centres in Norway regarding patients that were referred and offered health care (N = 264). Data consisted of triage decisions for each patient (i.e., the hospital specialist’s assessment of maximum acceptable waiting time), which were determined on the basis of a) referral information and b) meeting the patient. Referral letter quality was evaluated using the Quality of Referral information-Mental Health checklist. The reliability of priority setting and the impact of referral letter quality on this measure were investigated using descriptive analyses, binary logistic regression and Nadaraya-Watson kernel regression. Results In 143 (54%) cases, the triage decision based on referral information corresponded with the decision based on patient consultation. In 70 (27%) cases, the urgency of need for treatment was underestimated when based on referral information compared with that based on information from patient consultation. Referral letter quality could not explain the differences between the two triage decisions. However, when a cut-off value of 7 on the Quality of Referral information-Mental Health scale was used, low-quality letters were found more frequently among patients whose urgency of need was underestimated, compared with those whose need was overestimated. Conclusions Deciding the urgency of patient need for specialised mental health care based on referral information is a reliable system in many situations. However, the possibility of under- and overestimation is present, implying risks to patient safety and inappropriate use of resources. Improving the content of referral letters does not appear to reduce this risk when the letters are of acceptable quality. Trial registration NCT01374035 .
first_indexed 2024-12-12T03:15:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-8071b2cf3cf34233a86a3bc9f1c58a2b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T03:15:35Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-8071b2cf3cf34233a86a3bc9f1c58a2b2022-12-22T00:40:18ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632022-06-0122111010.1186/s12913-022-08139-3The impact of referral letter quality on timely access to specialised mental health care: a quantitative study of the reliability of patient triageMarit Nymoen0Eva Biringer1Øystein Hetlevik2Olav Thorsen3Jörg Assmus4Miriam Hartveit5Department of Research and Innovation, Helse Fonna Health TrustDepartment of Research and Innovation, Helse Fonna Health TrustDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of BergenThe General Practice and Care Coordination Research Group, Stavanger University HospitalCenter for Clinical Research, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Research and Innovation, Helse Fonna Health TrustAbstract Background Patients referred to specialised mental health care are usually triaged based on referral information provided by general practitioners. However, knowledge about this system’s ability to ensure timely access to and equity in specialised mental health care is limited. We aimed to investigate to the degree to which patient triage, based on referral letter information, corresponds to triage based on a hospital specialist’s consultation with the patient, and whether the degree of correspondence is affected by the quality of the referral letter. Methods We gathered information from three specialised mental health centres in Norway regarding patients that were referred and offered health care (N = 264). Data consisted of triage decisions for each patient (i.e., the hospital specialist’s assessment of maximum acceptable waiting time), which were determined on the basis of a) referral information and b) meeting the patient. Referral letter quality was evaluated using the Quality of Referral information-Mental Health checklist. The reliability of priority setting and the impact of referral letter quality on this measure were investigated using descriptive analyses, binary logistic regression and Nadaraya-Watson kernel regression. Results In 143 (54%) cases, the triage decision based on referral information corresponded with the decision based on patient consultation. In 70 (27%) cases, the urgency of need for treatment was underestimated when based on referral information compared with that based on information from patient consultation. Referral letter quality could not explain the differences between the two triage decisions. However, when a cut-off value of 7 on the Quality of Referral information-Mental Health scale was used, low-quality letters were found more frequently among patients whose urgency of need was underestimated, compared with those whose need was overestimated. Conclusions Deciding the urgency of patient need for specialised mental health care based on referral information is a reliable system in many situations. However, the possibility of under- and overestimation is present, implying risks to patient safety and inappropriate use of resources. Improving the content of referral letters does not appear to reduce this risk when the letters are of acceptable quality. Trial registration NCT01374035 .https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08139-3Patient triageNeeds assessmentMental health servicesReferral and consultationHealth prioritiesHospital referrals
spellingShingle Marit Nymoen
Eva Biringer
Øystein Hetlevik
Olav Thorsen
Jörg Assmus
Miriam Hartveit
The impact of referral letter quality on timely access to specialised mental health care: a quantitative study of the reliability of patient triage
BMC Health Services Research
Patient triage
Needs assessment
Mental health services
Referral and consultation
Health priorities
Hospital referrals
title The impact of referral letter quality on timely access to specialised mental health care: a quantitative study of the reliability of patient triage
title_full The impact of referral letter quality on timely access to specialised mental health care: a quantitative study of the reliability of patient triage
title_fullStr The impact of referral letter quality on timely access to specialised mental health care: a quantitative study of the reliability of patient triage
title_full_unstemmed The impact of referral letter quality on timely access to specialised mental health care: a quantitative study of the reliability of patient triage
title_short The impact of referral letter quality on timely access to specialised mental health care: a quantitative study of the reliability of patient triage
title_sort impact of referral letter quality on timely access to specialised mental health care a quantitative study of the reliability of patient triage
topic Patient triage
Needs assessment
Mental health services
Referral and consultation
Health priorities
Hospital referrals
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08139-3
work_keys_str_mv AT maritnymoen theimpactofreferralletterqualityontimelyaccesstospecialisedmentalhealthcareaquantitativestudyofthereliabilityofpatienttriage
AT evabiringer theimpactofreferralletterqualityontimelyaccesstospecialisedmentalhealthcareaquantitativestudyofthereliabilityofpatienttriage
AT øysteinhetlevik theimpactofreferralletterqualityontimelyaccesstospecialisedmentalhealthcareaquantitativestudyofthereliabilityofpatienttriage
AT olavthorsen theimpactofreferralletterqualityontimelyaccesstospecialisedmentalhealthcareaquantitativestudyofthereliabilityofpatienttriage
AT jorgassmus theimpactofreferralletterqualityontimelyaccesstospecialisedmentalhealthcareaquantitativestudyofthereliabilityofpatienttriage
AT miriamhartveit theimpactofreferralletterqualityontimelyaccesstospecialisedmentalhealthcareaquantitativestudyofthereliabilityofpatienttriage
AT maritnymoen impactofreferralletterqualityontimelyaccesstospecialisedmentalhealthcareaquantitativestudyofthereliabilityofpatienttriage
AT evabiringer impactofreferralletterqualityontimelyaccesstospecialisedmentalhealthcareaquantitativestudyofthereliabilityofpatienttriage
AT øysteinhetlevik impactofreferralletterqualityontimelyaccesstospecialisedmentalhealthcareaquantitativestudyofthereliabilityofpatienttriage
AT olavthorsen impactofreferralletterqualityontimelyaccesstospecialisedmentalhealthcareaquantitativestudyofthereliabilityofpatienttriage
AT jorgassmus impactofreferralletterqualityontimelyaccesstospecialisedmentalhealthcareaquantitativestudyofthereliabilityofpatienttriage
AT miriamhartveit impactofreferralletterqualityontimelyaccesstospecialisedmentalhealthcareaquantitativestudyofthereliabilityofpatienttriage