Performance feedback enhances test-potentiated encoding

IntroductionLong-term memory retention is enhanced after testing compared to restudying (testing effect). Notably, memory retrieval further improves when correct-answer feedback is provided after the retrieval attempt (test-potentiated encoding–TPE).MethodsTo evaluate whether explicit positive or ne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Petra Ludowicy, Pedro M. Paz-Alonso, Thomas Lachmann, Daniela Czernochowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1100497/full
_version_ 1797843581575102464
author Petra Ludowicy
Petra Ludowicy
Pedro M. Paz-Alonso
Pedro M. Paz-Alonso
Thomas Lachmann
Thomas Lachmann
Thomas Lachmann
Daniela Czernochowski
author_facet Petra Ludowicy
Petra Ludowicy
Pedro M. Paz-Alonso
Pedro M. Paz-Alonso
Thomas Lachmann
Thomas Lachmann
Thomas Lachmann
Daniela Czernochowski
author_sort Petra Ludowicy
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionLong-term memory retention is enhanced after testing compared to restudying (testing effect). Notably, memory retrieval further improves when correct-answer feedback is provided after the retrieval attempt (test-potentiated encoding–TPE).MethodsTo evaluate whether explicit positive or negative feedback further enhances memory performance beyond the effect of TPE, in two experiments additional explicit positive or negative performance-contingent feedback was presented before providing correct-answer feedback. After an initial exposure to the full material, 40 participants learned 210 weakly associated cue-target word pairs by either restudying or testing (Experiment 1). Depending on the accuracy of the retrieval attempt, the tested word pairs were followed by positive or negative performance feedback (50%) or no feedback (50%). Irrespective of the type of repetition, trials were followed by a restudy opportunity. Participants returned to perform a final cued-recall test (Day 2).ResultsFinal test results replicated the testing effect (better memory performance for tested compared to restudied items). Explicit performance feedback in addition to correct-answer feedback increased retrieval performance, but only on Day 2. This pattern of results was replicated in Experiment 2 in an independent sample of 25 participants. To assess the specific effects of learning history, we also examined retrieval accuracy and reaction times during repetition cycles: Explicit feedback improved retrieval for material successfully encoded in the initial study phase (consistent positive feedback) as well as for material learned during the repetition phase (mixed positive and negative feedback).DiscussionPerformance feedback improves learning beyond the effects of retrieval practice and correct-answer feedback, suggesting that it strengthens memory representations and promotes re-encoding of the material.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:08:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-807df2d72b4b48238f35667638a417e9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5153
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:08:42Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-807df2d72b4b48238f35667638a417e92023-04-20T09:11:33ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience1662-51532023-04-011710.3389/fnbeh.2023.11004971100497Performance feedback enhances test-potentiated encodingPetra Ludowicy0Petra Ludowicy1Pedro M. Paz-Alonso2Pedro M. Paz-Alonso3Thomas Lachmann4Thomas Lachmann5Thomas Lachmann6Daniela Czernochowski7Cognitive and Developmental Psychology Unit, Center for Cognitive Science, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), Kaiserslautern, GermanyCognitive Neuroscience Unit, Center for Cognitive Science, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), Kaiserslautern, GermanyBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastian, SpainIKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, SpainCognitive and Developmental Psychology Unit, Center for Cognitive Science, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), Kaiserslautern, GermanyCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, Madrid, SpainUniversity of Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumCognitive Neuroscience Unit, Center for Cognitive Science, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), Kaiserslautern, GermanyIntroductionLong-term memory retention is enhanced after testing compared to restudying (testing effect). Notably, memory retrieval further improves when correct-answer feedback is provided after the retrieval attempt (test-potentiated encoding–TPE).MethodsTo evaluate whether explicit positive or negative feedback further enhances memory performance beyond the effect of TPE, in two experiments additional explicit positive or negative performance-contingent feedback was presented before providing correct-answer feedback. After an initial exposure to the full material, 40 participants learned 210 weakly associated cue-target word pairs by either restudying or testing (Experiment 1). Depending on the accuracy of the retrieval attempt, the tested word pairs were followed by positive or negative performance feedback (50%) or no feedback (50%). Irrespective of the type of repetition, trials were followed by a restudy opportunity. Participants returned to perform a final cued-recall test (Day 2).ResultsFinal test results replicated the testing effect (better memory performance for tested compared to restudied items). Explicit performance feedback in addition to correct-answer feedback increased retrieval performance, but only on Day 2. This pattern of results was replicated in Experiment 2 in an independent sample of 25 participants. To assess the specific effects of learning history, we also examined retrieval accuracy and reaction times during repetition cycles: Explicit feedback improved retrieval for material successfully encoded in the initial study phase (consistent positive feedback) as well as for material learned during the repetition phase (mixed positive and negative feedback).DiscussionPerformance feedback improves learning beyond the effects of retrieval practice and correct-answer feedback, suggesting that it strengthens memory representations and promotes re-encoding of the material.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1100497/fullreinforcement learningepisodic memorytesting effecttest-potentiated learningfeedbackretrieval
spellingShingle Petra Ludowicy
Petra Ludowicy
Pedro M. Paz-Alonso
Pedro M. Paz-Alonso
Thomas Lachmann
Thomas Lachmann
Thomas Lachmann
Daniela Czernochowski
Performance feedback enhances test-potentiated encoding
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
reinforcement learning
episodic memory
testing effect
test-potentiated learning
feedback
retrieval
title Performance feedback enhances test-potentiated encoding
title_full Performance feedback enhances test-potentiated encoding
title_fullStr Performance feedback enhances test-potentiated encoding
title_full_unstemmed Performance feedback enhances test-potentiated encoding
title_short Performance feedback enhances test-potentiated encoding
title_sort performance feedback enhances test potentiated encoding
topic reinforcement learning
episodic memory
testing effect
test-potentiated learning
feedback
retrieval
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1100497/full
work_keys_str_mv AT petraludowicy performancefeedbackenhancestestpotentiatedencoding
AT petraludowicy performancefeedbackenhancestestpotentiatedencoding
AT pedrompazalonso performancefeedbackenhancestestpotentiatedencoding
AT pedrompazalonso performancefeedbackenhancestestpotentiatedencoding
AT thomaslachmann performancefeedbackenhancestestpotentiatedencoding
AT thomaslachmann performancefeedbackenhancestestpotentiatedencoding
AT thomaslachmann performancefeedbackenhancestestpotentiatedencoding
AT danielaczernochowski performancefeedbackenhancestestpotentiatedencoding