Incorrect data sustain the claim of forest‐based bioenergy being more effective in climate change mitigation than forest conservation

Incorrect data sustain the claim of forest‐based bioenergy being more effective in climate change mitigation than forest conservation

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Torsten Welle, Pierre L. Ibisch, Jeanette S. Blumroeder, Yvonne E.‐M. B. Bohr, Loretta Leinen, Tobias Wohlleben, Knut Sturm
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Wiley 2021-02-01
Series:	GCB Bioenergy
Online Access:	https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12738

Similar Items

Accurate use of forest inventories shows that unmanaged forests have a higher climate protection effect than managed forests: A response to the letter by Bolte et al.
by: Torsten Welle, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

Ecosystemic resilience of a temperate post-fire forest under extreme weather conditions
by: Jeanette S. Blumroeder, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

Does fragmentation contribute to the forest crisis in Germany?
by: Deepika Mann, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

The climate change mitigation effect of bioenergy from sustainably managed forests in Central Europe
by: Ernst Detlef Schulze, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

Sustainable forest-based bioenergy in Eurasia
by: F. Kraxner, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01)

An Overview on the Conversion of Forest Biomass into Bioenergy
by: Qing Yu, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

A regional assessment of land‐based carbon mitigation potentials: Bioenergy, BECCS, reforestation, and forest management
by: Andreas Krause, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)

Forest bioenergy feedstock in Lithuania – Renewable energy goals and the use of forest resources
by: X. Pang, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)

Towards the Evaluation of the Ecological Effectiveness of the Principles, Criteria and Indicators (PCI) of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC): Case study in the Arkhangelsk Region in the Russian Federation
by: Jeanette Silvin Blumroeder, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

A Review on the Potential of Forest Biomass for Bioenergy in Australia
by: Sam Van Holsbeeck, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

BioEnergy and the Forest Products Industry in the Atlantica Region
by: Thor Olesen
Published: (2008-07-01)

Modeling Harvest Forest Residue Collection for Bioenergy Production
by: Rene Zamora-Cristales, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Forest Biomass in Bioenergy Production in the Changing Geopolitical Environment of the EU
by: Anna Kożuch, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Carbon neutrality of forest biomass for bioenergy: a scoping review
by: Selivanov E, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

Breeding, Early-Successional Bird Response to Forest Harvests for Bioenergy.
by: Steven M Grodsky, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Gaze patterns enhance response prediction: More than correct or incorrect
by: Sebastian Becker, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01)

Policy narratives in forest fire management
by: Nikola Tietze, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Climate change substitution factors for Canadian forest-based products and bioenergy
by: Thomas Cardinal, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01)

Greenhouse Gas Emission Offsets of Forest Residues for Bioenergy in Queensland, Australia
by: Leanda C. Garvie, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01)

Economic factors influence net carbon emissions of forest bioenergy expansion
by: Alice Favero, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01)

Relative benefits of allocating land to bioenergy crops and forests vary by region
by: Irina Melnikova, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

Global climate impacts of forest bioenergy: what, when and how to measure?
by: Francesco Cherubini, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Assessing the availability of forest biomass for bioenergy by publicly available satellite imagery
by: Vacchiano G, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01)

Biomasfor: an open-source holistic model for the assessment of sustainable forest bioenergy
by: Sacchelli S, et al.
Published: (2013-10-01)

Mapping Dominant Tree Species of German Forests
by: Torsten Welle, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01)

Incorrect ICBM-DTI-81 Atlas Orientation and White Matter Labels
by: Torsten eRohlfing
Published: (2013-01-01)

Bioenergy for climate change mitigation: Scale and sustainability
by: Katherine Calvin, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

Corrigendum: Global climate impacts of forest bioenergy: what, when and how to measure?
by: Francesco, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

BIOENERGY BASED ON WOOD CHIPS AS THE DEVELOPMENT DRIVER OF NON-URBAN FORESTED AREAS
by: Natalia VUKOVIC, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01)

Teaching concepts incorrectly /
by: 327570 Bompart, Bill

Bioenergy and its use to mitigate the climate impact of aviation
by: Staples, Mark Douglas
Published: (2017)

Forest Supply Chain for Bioenergy: An Approach for Biomass Study in the Framework of a Circular Bioeconomy
by: Silvina M. Manrique, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Publisher Correction: Economic factors influence net carbon emissions of forest bioenergy expansion
by: Alice Favero, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

An integrated assessment approach to optimal forest bioenergy production for young Scots pine stands
by: Tianjian Cao, et al.
Published: (2015-06-01)

Economic indicators and bioenergy supply in developed economies: QROF-DEMATEL and random forest models
by: Miraj Ahmed Bhuiyan, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)

Harvesting Carbon from Eastern US Forests: Opportunities and Impacts of an Expanding Bioenergy Industry
by: Sarah C. Davis, et al.
Published: (2012-06-01)

A Hierarchical Approach to Estimate Spatially Available Potential of Primary Forest Residues for Bioenergy
by: Hüseyin Oğuz Çoban, et al.
Published: (2014-05-01)

Management of plantation forests for bioenergy generation, timber production, carbon emission reductions, and removals
by: Yadanar Ye Myint, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Governing sustainability of bioenergy, biomaterial and bioproduct supply chains from forest and agricultural landscapes
by: Inge Stupak, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)

Assessing the potential for unaccounted emissions from bioenergy and the implications for forests: The United States and global
by: Jason M. Funk, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)