Cognition of complexity and trade-offs in a wildfire-prone social-ecological system
Wildfire risk is a defining environmental challenge throughout much of the American West, as well as in other regions where complex social and ecological dynamics defy simple policy or management solutions. In such settings, diverse forms of land use, livelihoods, and accompanying values provide the...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IOP Publishing
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | Environmental Research Letters |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab59c1 |
| _version_ | 1797747599521873920 |
|---|---|
| author | M Hamilton J Salerno A P Fischer |
| author_facet | M Hamilton J Salerno A P Fischer |
| author_sort | M Hamilton |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Wildfire risk is a defining environmental challenge throughout much of the American West, as well as in other regions where complex social and ecological dynamics defy simple policy or management solutions. In such settings, diverse forms of land use, livelihoods, and accompanying values provide the conditions for trade-offs (e.g. between protecting homes from uncontrollable fires and restoring low-severity fire to ecosystems as a natural disturbance process). Addressing wildfire risk requires grappling with these trade-offs at multiple levels—given the need for action by individuals as well as by large and diverse stakeholder groups—and under conditions of considerable complexity. We evaluated how individual and collective perception of trade-offs varies as a function of complexity through analysis of the cognitive maps—representations of perceived causal relationships among factors that structure an individual’s understanding of a system—of 111 stakeholders in the Eastern Cascades Ecoregion of central Oregon. Bayesian statistical analysis revealed a strong tendency against perception of trade-offs in individual maps, but not in a collective map that resulted from the aggregation of all individual cognitive maps. Furthermore, we found that lags (the number of factors that mediated the effect of an action on multiple valued outcomes) limited perception of trade-offs. Each additional intervening factor decreased the likelihood of a trade-off by approximately 52% in individual cognitive maps and by 10% in the collective cognitive map. However, the heterogeneity of these factors increased the likelihood of perception of trade-offs, particularly among individual cognitive maps, for which each unit increase of the Shannon diversity index translated into a 20-fold increase in the likelihood of perception of trade-offs. Taken together, these results suggest that features of complexity have distinct effects on individual—and collective-level perception of trade-offs. We discuss implications for wildfire risk decision-making in central Oregon and in other complex wildfire-prone social-ecological systems. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T15:53:48Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-809311bb525748b3ac5571f5fcaeaa21 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1748-9326 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T15:53:48Z |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | IOP Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Environmental Research Letters |
| spelling | doaj.art-809311bb525748b3ac5571f5fcaeaa212023-08-09T15:02:09ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262019-01-01141212501710.1088/1748-9326/ab59c1Cognition of complexity and trade-offs in a wildfire-prone social-ecological systemM Hamilton0J Salerno1A P Fischer2School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University , Columbus, OH, United States of AmericaDepartment of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO, United States of AmericaSchool for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI, United States of AmericaWildfire risk is a defining environmental challenge throughout much of the American West, as well as in other regions where complex social and ecological dynamics defy simple policy or management solutions. In such settings, diverse forms of land use, livelihoods, and accompanying values provide the conditions for trade-offs (e.g. between protecting homes from uncontrollable fires and restoring low-severity fire to ecosystems as a natural disturbance process). Addressing wildfire risk requires grappling with these trade-offs at multiple levels—given the need for action by individuals as well as by large and diverse stakeholder groups—and under conditions of considerable complexity. We evaluated how individual and collective perception of trade-offs varies as a function of complexity through analysis of the cognitive maps—representations of perceived causal relationships among factors that structure an individual’s understanding of a system—of 111 stakeholders in the Eastern Cascades Ecoregion of central Oregon. Bayesian statistical analysis revealed a strong tendency against perception of trade-offs in individual maps, but not in a collective map that resulted from the aggregation of all individual cognitive maps. Furthermore, we found that lags (the number of factors that mediated the effect of an action on multiple valued outcomes) limited perception of trade-offs. Each additional intervening factor decreased the likelihood of a trade-off by approximately 52% in individual cognitive maps and by 10% in the collective cognitive map. However, the heterogeneity of these factors increased the likelihood of perception of trade-offs, particularly among individual cognitive maps, for which each unit increase of the Shannon diversity index translated into a 20-fold increase in the likelihood of perception of trade-offs. Taken together, these results suggest that features of complexity have distinct effects on individual—and collective-level perception of trade-offs. We discuss implications for wildfire risk decision-making in central Oregon and in other complex wildfire-prone social-ecological systems.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab59c1trade-offswildfireOregoncomplexitycognitive maps |
| spellingShingle | M Hamilton J Salerno A P Fischer Cognition of complexity and trade-offs in a wildfire-prone social-ecological system Environmental Research Letters trade-offs wildfire Oregon complexity cognitive maps |
| title | Cognition of complexity and trade-offs in a wildfire-prone social-ecological system |
| title_full | Cognition of complexity and trade-offs in a wildfire-prone social-ecological system |
| title_fullStr | Cognition of complexity and trade-offs in a wildfire-prone social-ecological system |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cognition of complexity and trade-offs in a wildfire-prone social-ecological system |
| title_short | Cognition of complexity and trade-offs in a wildfire-prone social-ecological system |
| title_sort | cognition of complexity and trade offs in a wildfire prone social ecological system |
| topic | trade-offs wildfire Oregon complexity cognitive maps |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab59c1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mhamilton cognitionofcomplexityandtradeoffsinawildfirepronesocialecologicalsystem AT jsalerno cognitionofcomplexityandtradeoffsinawildfirepronesocialecologicalsystem AT apfischer cognitionofcomplexityandtradeoffsinawildfirepronesocialecologicalsystem |