Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography

Abstract Deep learning allows automatic segmentation of teeth on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). However, the segmentation performance of deep learning varies among different training strategies. Our aim was to propose a 3.5D U-Net to improve the performance of the U-Net in segmenting teeth on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kang Hsu, Da-Yo Yuh, Shao-Chieh Lin, Pin-Sian Lyu, Guan-Xin Pan, Yi-Chun Zhuang, Chia-Ching Chang, Hsu-Hsia Peng, Tung-Yang Lee, Cheng-Hsuan Juan, Cheng-En Juan, Yi-Jui Liu, Chun-Jung Juan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-11-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23901-7
_version_ 1798016901697241088
author Kang Hsu
Da-Yo Yuh
Shao-Chieh Lin
Pin-Sian Lyu
Guan-Xin Pan
Yi-Chun Zhuang
Chia-Ching Chang
Hsu-Hsia Peng
Tung-Yang Lee
Cheng-Hsuan Juan
Cheng-En Juan
Yi-Jui Liu
Chun-Jung Juan
author_facet Kang Hsu
Da-Yo Yuh
Shao-Chieh Lin
Pin-Sian Lyu
Guan-Xin Pan
Yi-Chun Zhuang
Chia-Ching Chang
Hsu-Hsia Peng
Tung-Yang Lee
Cheng-Hsuan Juan
Cheng-En Juan
Yi-Jui Liu
Chun-Jung Juan
author_sort Kang Hsu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Deep learning allows automatic segmentation of teeth on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). However, the segmentation performance of deep learning varies among different training strategies. Our aim was to propose a 3.5D U-Net to improve the performance of the U-Net in segmenting teeth on CBCT. This study retrospectively enrolled 24 patients who received CBCT. Five U-Nets, including 2Da U-Net, 2Dc U-Net, 2Ds U-Net, 2.5Da U-Net, 3D U-Net, were trained to segment the teeth. Four additional U-Nets, including 2.5Dv U-Net, 3.5Dv5 U-Net, 3.5Dv4 U-Net, and 3.5Dv3 U-Net, were obtained using majority voting. Mathematical morphology operations including erosion and dilation (E&D) were applied to remove diminutive noise speckles. Segmentation performance was evaluated by fourfold cross validation using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV). Kruskal–Wallis test with post hoc analysis using Bonferroni correction was used for group comparison. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Performance of U-Nets significantly varies among different training strategies for teeth segmentation on CBCT (P < 0.05). The 3.5Dv5 U-Net and 2.5Dv U-Net showed DSC and PPV significantly higher than any of five originally trained U-Nets (all P < 0.05). E&D significantly improved the DSC, accuracy, specificity, and PPV (all P < 0.005). The 3.5Dv5 U-Net achieved highest DSC and accuracy among all U-Nets. The segmentation performance of the U-Net can be improved by majority voting and E&D. Overall speaking, the 3.5Dv5 U-Net achieved the best segmentation performance among all U-Nets.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T15:56:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-80966284a2854f8eb1de156a8110ed9e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T15:56:54Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-80966284a2854f8eb1de156a8110ed9e2022-12-22T04:15:07ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-11-0112111510.1038/s41598-022-23901-7Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomographyKang Hsu0Da-Yo Yuh1Shao-Chieh Lin2Pin-Sian Lyu3Guan-Xin Pan4Yi-Chun Zhuang5Chia-Ching Chang6Hsu-Hsia Peng7Tung-Yang Lee8Cheng-Hsuan Juan9Cheng-En Juan10Yi-Jui Liu11Chun-Jung Juan12Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical CenterDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical CenterDepartment of Medical Imaging, Xinglong Rd, China Medical University Hsinchu HospitalDepartment of Medical Imaging, Xinglong Rd, China Medical University Hsinchu HospitalDepartment of Medical Imaging, Xinglong Rd, China Medical University Hsinchu HospitalDepartment of Medical Imaging, Xinglong Rd, China Medical University Hsinchu HospitalDepartment of Medical Imaging, Xinglong Rd, China Medical University Hsinchu HospitalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua UniversityMaster’s Program of Biomedical Informatics and Biomedical Engineering, Feng Chia UniversityDepartment of Medical Imaging, Xinglong Rd, China Medical University Hsinchu HospitalDepartment of Automatic Control Engineering, Feng Chia UniversityDepartment of Automatic Control Engineering, Feng Chia UniversityDepartment of Medical Imaging, Xinglong Rd, China Medical University Hsinchu HospitalAbstract Deep learning allows automatic segmentation of teeth on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). However, the segmentation performance of deep learning varies among different training strategies. Our aim was to propose a 3.5D U-Net to improve the performance of the U-Net in segmenting teeth on CBCT. This study retrospectively enrolled 24 patients who received CBCT. Five U-Nets, including 2Da U-Net, 2Dc U-Net, 2Ds U-Net, 2.5Da U-Net, 3D U-Net, were trained to segment the teeth. Four additional U-Nets, including 2.5Dv U-Net, 3.5Dv5 U-Net, 3.5Dv4 U-Net, and 3.5Dv3 U-Net, were obtained using majority voting. Mathematical morphology operations including erosion and dilation (E&D) were applied to remove diminutive noise speckles. Segmentation performance was evaluated by fourfold cross validation using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV). Kruskal–Wallis test with post hoc analysis using Bonferroni correction was used for group comparison. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Performance of U-Nets significantly varies among different training strategies for teeth segmentation on CBCT (P < 0.05). The 3.5Dv5 U-Net and 2.5Dv U-Net showed DSC and PPV significantly higher than any of five originally trained U-Nets (all P < 0.05). E&D significantly improved the DSC, accuracy, specificity, and PPV (all P < 0.005). The 3.5Dv5 U-Net achieved highest DSC and accuracy among all U-Nets. The segmentation performance of the U-Net can be improved by majority voting and E&D. Overall speaking, the 3.5Dv5 U-Net achieved the best segmentation performance among all U-Nets.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23901-7
spellingShingle Kang Hsu
Da-Yo Yuh
Shao-Chieh Lin
Pin-Sian Lyu
Guan-Xin Pan
Yi-Chun Zhuang
Chia-Ching Chang
Hsu-Hsia Peng
Tung-Yang Lee
Cheng-Hsuan Juan
Cheng-En Juan
Yi-Jui Liu
Chun-Jung Juan
Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography
Scientific Reports
title Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography
title_full Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography
title_fullStr Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography
title_short Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography
title_sort improving performance of deep learning models using 3 5d u net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23901-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kanghsu improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT dayoyuh improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT shaochiehlin improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT pinsianlyu improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT guanxinpan improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT yichunzhuang improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT chiachingchang improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT hsuhsiapeng improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT tungyanglee improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT chenghsuanjuan improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT chengenjuan improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT yijuiliu improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT chunjungjuan improvingperformanceofdeeplearningmodelsusing35dunetviamajorityvotingfortoothsegmentationonconebeamcomputedtomography