Contradictions in Motion: Why They’re not Needed and Why They Wouldn’t Help

In this paper we discuss Priest’s account of change and motion, contrasting it with its more orthodox rival, the Russellian account. The paper is divided in two parts. In first one we take a stance that is more sympathetic to the Russellian view, arguing that Priest’s arguments against it are inconc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emiliano Boccardi, Moisés Macías-Bustos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente 2018-05-01
Series:Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/38
_version_ 1818393522760318976
author Emiliano Boccardi
Moisés Macías-Bustos
author_facet Emiliano Boccardi
Moisés Macías-Bustos
author_sort Emiliano Boccardi
collection DOAJ
description In this paper we discuss Priest’s account of change and motion, contrasting it with its more orthodox rival, the Russellian account. The paper is divided in two parts. In first one we take a stance that is more sympathetic to the Russellian view, arguing that Priest’s arguments against it are inconclusive. In the second part, instead, we take a more sympathetic attitude towards Priest’s objections. We argue, however, that if these objections pose insurmountable difficulties to the Russellian account (which is what one of the authors of this paper indeed thinks), then they pose the same difficulties also to Priest’s favoured Hegelian account, and for the same reasons
first_indexed 2024-12-14T05:46:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-80a302c6becd4485a090b38f707cc8df
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1972-1293
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T05:46:39Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente
record_format Article
series Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
spelling doaj.art-80a302c6becd4485a090b38f707cc8df2022-12-21T23:14:51ZengAssociazione Culturale Humana.MenteHumana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies1972-12932018-05-011032Contradictions in Motion: Why They’re not Needed and Why They Wouldn’t HelpEmiliano Boccardi0Moisés Macías-Bustos1Universidade Estadual de Campinas, BrasilUNAM, Graduate Program in Philosophy of Science, MexicoIn this paper we discuss Priest’s account of change and motion, contrasting it with its more orthodox rival, the Russellian account. The paper is divided in two parts. In first one we take a stance that is more sympathetic to the Russellian view, arguing that Priest’s arguments against it are inconclusive. In the second part, instead, we take a more sympathetic attitude towards Priest’s objections. We argue, however, that if these objections pose insurmountable difficulties to the Russellian account (which is what one of the authors of this paper indeed thinks), then they pose the same difficulties also to Priest’s favoured Hegelian account, and for the same reasonshttp://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/38change and motionRussellian accountHegelian account
spellingShingle Emiliano Boccardi
Moisés Macías-Bustos
Contradictions in Motion: Why They’re not Needed and Why They Wouldn’t Help
Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
change and motion
Russellian account
Hegelian account
title Contradictions in Motion: Why They’re not Needed and Why They Wouldn’t Help
title_full Contradictions in Motion: Why They’re not Needed and Why They Wouldn’t Help
title_fullStr Contradictions in Motion: Why They’re not Needed and Why They Wouldn’t Help
title_full_unstemmed Contradictions in Motion: Why They’re not Needed and Why They Wouldn’t Help
title_short Contradictions in Motion: Why They’re not Needed and Why They Wouldn’t Help
title_sort contradictions in motion why they re not needed and why they wouldn t help
topic change and motion
Russellian account
Hegelian account
url http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/38
work_keys_str_mv AT emilianoboccardi contradictionsinmotionwhytheyrenotneededandwhytheywouldnthelp
AT moisesmaciasbustos contradictionsinmotionwhytheyrenotneededandwhytheywouldnthelp