Children and parents’ perspectives on the acceptability of three management strategies for dental caries in primary teeth within the ‘Filling Children’s Teeth: Indicated or Not’ (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial – a qualitative study

Abstract Background The Filling Children’s Teeth: Indicated Or Not? (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed to explore the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of managing dental caries in children’s primary teeth. The trial compared three management strategies: conventional caries management...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarab El-Yousfi, Nicola P. T. Innes, Richard D. Holmes, Ruth Freeman, Kathryn B. Cunningham, Elaine McColl, Anne Maguire, Gail V. A. Douglas, Janet E. Clarkson, Zoe Marshman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-03-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-020-1060-6
_version_ 1818286209464532992
author Sarab El-Yousfi
Nicola P. T. Innes
Richard D. Holmes
Ruth Freeman
Kathryn B. Cunningham
Elaine McColl
Anne Maguire
Gail V. A. Douglas
Janet E. Clarkson
Zoe Marshman
author_facet Sarab El-Yousfi
Nicola P. T. Innes
Richard D. Holmes
Ruth Freeman
Kathryn B. Cunningham
Elaine McColl
Anne Maguire
Gail V. A. Douglas
Janet E. Clarkson
Zoe Marshman
author_sort Sarab El-Yousfi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The Filling Children’s Teeth: Indicated Or Not? (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed to explore the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of managing dental caries in children’s primary teeth. The trial compared three management strategies: conventional caries management with best practice prevention (C + P), biological management with best practice prevention (B + P) and best practice prevention alone (PA)-based approaches. Recently, the concept of treatment acceptability has gained attention and attempts have been made to provide a conceptual definition, however this has mainly focused on adults. Recognising the importance of evaluating the acceptability of interventions in addition to their effectiveness, particularly for multi-component complex interventions, the trial design included a qualitative component. The aim of this component was to explore the acceptability of the three strategies from the perspectives of the child participants and their parents. Methods Qualitative exploration, based on the concept of acceptability. Participants were children already taking part in the FiCTION trial and their parents. Children were identified through purposive maximum variation sampling. The sample included children from the three management strategy arms who had been treated and followed up; median (IQR) follow-up was at 33.8 (23.8, 36.7) months. Semi-structured interviews with thirteen child-parent dyads. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach. Results Data saturation was reached after thirteen interviews. Each child-parent dyad took part in one interview together. The participants were eight girls and five boys aged 5–11 years and their parents. The children’s distribution across the trial arms was: C + P n = 4; B + P n = 5; PA n = 4. Three key factors influenced the acceptability of caries management in primary teeth to children and parents: i) experiences of specific procedures within management strategies; ii) experiences of anticipatory dental anxiety and; iii) perceptions of effectiveness (particularly whether pain was reduced). These factors were underpinned by a fourth key factor: the notion of trust in the dental professionals – this was pervasive across all arms. Conclusions Overall children and parents found each of the three strategies for the management of dental caries in primary teeth acceptable, with trust in the dental professional playing an important role.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T01:20:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-80b46c621c8747e88cc45ce8eb384e42
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6831
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T01:20:57Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Oral Health
spelling doaj.art-80b46c621c8747e88cc45ce8eb384e422022-12-22T00:04:13ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312020-03-0120111210.1186/s12903-020-1060-6Children and parents’ perspectives on the acceptability of three management strategies for dental caries in primary teeth within the ‘Filling Children’s Teeth: Indicated or Not’ (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial – a qualitative studySarab El-Yousfi0Nicola P. T. Innes1Richard D. Holmes2Ruth Freeman3Kathryn B. Cunningham4Elaine McColl5Anne Maguire6Gail V. A. Douglas7Janet E. Clarkson8Zoe Marshman9School of Clinical DentistrySchool of Dentistry, University of DundeeSchool of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle UniversitySchool of Dentistry, University of DundeeSchool of Medicine, University of St AndrewsPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle UniversitySchool of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle UniversityUniversity of Leeds School of DentistryDental Health Services Research Unit, School of DentistrySchool of Clinical DentistryAbstract Background The Filling Children’s Teeth: Indicated Or Not? (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed to explore the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of managing dental caries in children’s primary teeth. The trial compared three management strategies: conventional caries management with best practice prevention (C + P), biological management with best practice prevention (B + P) and best practice prevention alone (PA)-based approaches. Recently, the concept of treatment acceptability has gained attention and attempts have been made to provide a conceptual definition, however this has mainly focused on adults. Recognising the importance of evaluating the acceptability of interventions in addition to their effectiveness, particularly for multi-component complex interventions, the trial design included a qualitative component. The aim of this component was to explore the acceptability of the three strategies from the perspectives of the child participants and their parents. Methods Qualitative exploration, based on the concept of acceptability. Participants were children already taking part in the FiCTION trial and their parents. Children were identified through purposive maximum variation sampling. The sample included children from the three management strategy arms who had been treated and followed up; median (IQR) follow-up was at 33.8 (23.8, 36.7) months. Semi-structured interviews with thirteen child-parent dyads. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach. Results Data saturation was reached after thirteen interviews. Each child-parent dyad took part in one interview together. The participants were eight girls and five boys aged 5–11 years and their parents. The children’s distribution across the trial arms was: C + P n = 4; B + P n = 5; PA n = 4. Three key factors influenced the acceptability of caries management in primary teeth to children and parents: i) experiences of specific procedures within management strategies; ii) experiences of anticipatory dental anxiety and; iii) perceptions of effectiveness (particularly whether pain was reduced). These factors were underpinned by a fourth key factor: the notion of trust in the dental professionals – this was pervasive across all arms. Conclusions Overall children and parents found each of the three strategies for the management of dental caries in primary teeth acceptable, with trust in the dental professional playing an important role.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-020-1060-6CariesCaries managementQualitativeChildrenParentsPaediatric dentistry
spellingShingle Sarab El-Yousfi
Nicola P. T. Innes
Richard D. Holmes
Ruth Freeman
Kathryn B. Cunningham
Elaine McColl
Anne Maguire
Gail V. A. Douglas
Janet E. Clarkson
Zoe Marshman
Children and parents’ perspectives on the acceptability of three management strategies for dental caries in primary teeth within the ‘Filling Children’s Teeth: Indicated or Not’ (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial – a qualitative study
BMC Oral Health
Caries
Caries management
Qualitative
Children
Parents
Paediatric dentistry
title Children and parents’ perspectives on the acceptability of three management strategies for dental caries in primary teeth within the ‘Filling Children’s Teeth: Indicated or Not’ (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial – a qualitative study
title_full Children and parents’ perspectives on the acceptability of three management strategies for dental caries in primary teeth within the ‘Filling Children’s Teeth: Indicated or Not’ (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial – a qualitative study
title_fullStr Children and parents’ perspectives on the acceptability of three management strategies for dental caries in primary teeth within the ‘Filling Children’s Teeth: Indicated or Not’ (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial – a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Children and parents’ perspectives on the acceptability of three management strategies for dental caries in primary teeth within the ‘Filling Children’s Teeth: Indicated or Not’ (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial – a qualitative study
title_short Children and parents’ perspectives on the acceptability of three management strategies for dental caries in primary teeth within the ‘Filling Children’s Teeth: Indicated or Not’ (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial – a qualitative study
title_sort children and parents perspectives on the acceptability of three management strategies for dental caries in primary teeth within the filling children s teeth indicated or not fiction randomised controlled trial a qualitative study
topic Caries
Caries management
Qualitative
Children
Parents
Paediatric dentistry
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-020-1060-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sarabelyousfi childrenandparentsperspectivesontheacceptabilityofthreemanagementstrategiesfordentalcariesinprimaryteethwithinthefillingchildrensteethindicatedornotfictionrandomisedcontrolledtrialaqualitativestudy
AT nicolaptinnes childrenandparentsperspectivesontheacceptabilityofthreemanagementstrategiesfordentalcariesinprimaryteethwithinthefillingchildrensteethindicatedornotfictionrandomisedcontrolledtrialaqualitativestudy
AT richarddholmes childrenandparentsperspectivesontheacceptabilityofthreemanagementstrategiesfordentalcariesinprimaryteethwithinthefillingchildrensteethindicatedornotfictionrandomisedcontrolledtrialaqualitativestudy
AT ruthfreeman childrenandparentsperspectivesontheacceptabilityofthreemanagementstrategiesfordentalcariesinprimaryteethwithinthefillingchildrensteethindicatedornotfictionrandomisedcontrolledtrialaqualitativestudy
AT kathrynbcunningham childrenandparentsperspectivesontheacceptabilityofthreemanagementstrategiesfordentalcariesinprimaryteethwithinthefillingchildrensteethindicatedornotfictionrandomisedcontrolledtrialaqualitativestudy
AT elainemccoll childrenandparentsperspectivesontheacceptabilityofthreemanagementstrategiesfordentalcariesinprimaryteethwithinthefillingchildrensteethindicatedornotfictionrandomisedcontrolledtrialaqualitativestudy
AT annemaguire childrenandparentsperspectivesontheacceptabilityofthreemanagementstrategiesfordentalcariesinprimaryteethwithinthefillingchildrensteethindicatedornotfictionrandomisedcontrolledtrialaqualitativestudy
AT gailvadouglas childrenandparentsperspectivesontheacceptabilityofthreemanagementstrategiesfordentalcariesinprimaryteethwithinthefillingchildrensteethindicatedornotfictionrandomisedcontrolledtrialaqualitativestudy
AT janeteclarkson childrenandparentsperspectivesontheacceptabilityofthreemanagementstrategiesfordentalcariesinprimaryteethwithinthefillingchildrensteethindicatedornotfictionrandomisedcontrolledtrialaqualitativestudy
AT zoemarshman childrenandparentsperspectivesontheacceptabilityofthreemanagementstrategiesfordentalcariesinprimaryteethwithinthefillingchildrensteethindicatedornotfictionrandomisedcontrolledtrialaqualitativestudy