Transvenous dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava

Abstract Background Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a rare congenital vascular anomaly. Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) in patients with PLSVC can be challenging because of the venous anomalies. We reported a case series of patients with PLSVC who underwent PPI with double activ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teng Li, Qiong Xu, Hong-tao Liao, Dimitrios Asvestas, Konstantinos P. Letsas, Yifu Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-04-01
Series:BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12872-019-1082-7
_version_ 1818251039946571776
author Teng Li
Qiong Xu
Hong-tao Liao
Dimitrios Asvestas
Konstantinos P. Letsas
Yifu Li
author_facet Teng Li
Qiong Xu
Hong-tao Liao
Dimitrios Asvestas
Konstantinos P. Letsas
Yifu Li
author_sort Teng Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a rare congenital vascular anomaly. Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) in patients with PLSVC can be challenging because of the venous anomalies. We reported a case series of patients with PLSVC who underwent PPI with double active fixation leads. Methods From January 2012 to July 2016, 9 patients (three male and six females, mean age 68 ± 11 years) with PLSVC who received a dual-chamber pacemaker with double active fixation leads were enrolled retrospectively in this observational study. The indications for pacemaker implantation were symptomatic third-degree atrioventricular block in one and sick sinus syndrome in eight patients. Results PPI were implanted successfully in all 9 patients. Successful positioning of the ventricular leads at the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) septum with a “C” shaped stylet was achieved in 7 patients (77.8%). In the remaining two cases, the ventricular leads were placed in the right ventricular apex and the inferior free wall of the sub-tricuspid annulus. The atrial leads were placed at the lateral wall of the right atrium in all patients. Procedure time and fluoroscopy time were 85.3 ± 11.3 min and 4.5 ± 1.1 min respectively. During a mean follow-up of 4 years, no complications were observed and pacing parameters did not change significantly. Conclusion PPI through PLSVC may be technically feasible, safe, and effective. Double active fixation leads may be standard for patients with PLSVC and most of the ventricular leads could be placed at the RVOT septum.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T16:01:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-80c7c57850ca4636aad57b717d770d44
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2261
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T16:01:57Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
spelling doaj.art-80c7c57850ca4636aad57b717d770d442022-12-22T00:19:23ZengBMCBMC Cardiovascular Disorders1471-22612019-04-011911610.1186/s12872-019-1082-7Transvenous dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with persistent left superior vena cavaTeng Li0Qiong Xu1Hong-tao Liao2Dimitrios Asvestas3Konstantinos P. Letsas4Yifu Li5Arrhythmia Department, Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesArrhythmia Department, Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesCardiovascular Department, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital & Guangdong Academy of Medical SciencesSecond Department of Cardiology, Laboratory of Cardiac Electrophysiology, “Evangelismos” General Hospital of AthensSecond Department of Cardiology, Laboratory of Cardiac Electrophysiology, “Evangelismos” General Hospital of AthensArrhythmia Department, Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesAbstract Background Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a rare congenital vascular anomaly. Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) in patients with PLSVC can be challenging because of the venous anomalies. We reported a case series of patients with PLSVC who underwent PPI with double active fixation leads. Methods From January 2012 to July 2016, 9 patients (three male and six females, mean age 68 ± 11 years) with PLSVC who received a dual-chamber pacemaker with double active fixation leads were enrolled retrospectively in this observational study. The indications for pacemaker implantation were symptomatic third-degree atrioventricular block in one and sick sinus syndrome in eight patients. Results PPI were implanted successfully in all 9 patients. Successful positioning of the ventricular leads at the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) septum with a “C” shaped stylet was achieved in 7 patients (77.8%). In the remaining two cases, the ventricular leads were placed in the right ventricular apex and the inferior free wall of the sub-tricuspid annulus. The atrial leads were placed at the lateral wall of the right atrium in all patients. Procedure time and fluoroscopy time were 85.3 ± 11.3 min and 4.5 ± 1.1 min respectively. During a mean follow-up of 4 years, no complications were observed and pacing parameters did not change significantly. Conclusion PPI through PLSVC may be technically feasible, safe, and effective. Double active fixation leads may be standard for patients with PLSVC and most of the ventricular leads could be placed at the RVOT septum.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12872-019-1082-7Persistent left superior vena cavaPacemakerImplantationActive fixation lead
spellingShingle Teng Li
Qiong Xu
Hong-tao Liao
Dimitrios Asvestas
Konstantinos P. Letsas
Yifu Li
Transvenous dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Persistent left superior vena cava
Pacemaker
Implantation
Active fixation lead
title Transvenous dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava
title_full Transvenous dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava
title_fullStr Transvenous dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava
title_full_unstemmed Transvenous dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava
title_short Transvenous dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava
title_sort transvenous dual chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava
topic Persistent left superior vena cava
Pacemaker
Implantation
Active fixation lead
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12872-019-1082-7
work_keys_str_mv AT tengli transvenousdualchamberpacemakerimplantationinpatientswithpersistentleftsuperiorvenacava
AT qiongxu transvenousdualchamberpacemakerimplantationinpatientswithpersistentleftsuperiorvenacava
AT hongtaoliao transvenousdualchamberpacemakerimplantationinpatientswithpersistentleftsuperiorvenacava
AT dimitriosasvestas transvenousdualchamberpacemakerimplantationinpatientswithpersistentleftsuperiorvenacava
AT konstantinospletsas transvenousdualchamberpacemakerimplantationinpatientswithpersistentleftsuperiorvenacava
AT yifuli transvenousdualchamberpacemakerimplantationinpatientswithpersistentleftsuperiorvenacava