Short implants to support mandibular complete dentures - photoelastic analysis

Abstract This study evaluated the stress behavior around short implants in edentulous atrophic mandibles. Six groups included implants with two diameters regular and wide (4 and 5 mm) and three lengths (5, 7 and 9 mm) as follows: Ci9 (9 x 4 mm), Ci7 (7 x 4 mm), Ci5 (5 x 4 mm), Wi9 (9 x 5 mm), Wi7 (7...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcele Jardim PIMENTEL, Wander José da SILVA, Altair Antoninha DEL BEL CURY
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica 2017-02-01
Series:Brazilian Oral Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000100216&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1811314540859621376
author Marcele Jardim PIMENTEL
Wander José da SILVA
Altair Antoninha DEL BEL CURY
author_facet Marcele Jardim PIMENTEL
Wander José da SILVA
Altair Antoninha DEL BEL CURY
author_sort Marcele Jardim PIMENTEL
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study evaluated the stress behavior around short implants in edentulous atrophic mandibles. Six groups included implants with two diameters regular and wide (4 and 5 mm) and three lengths (5, 7 and 9 mm) as follows: Ci9 (9 x 4 mm), Ci7 (7 x 4 mm), Ci5 (5 x 4 mm), Wi9 (9 x 5 mm), Wi7 (7 x 5 mm) and Wi5 (5 x 5 mm). These groups were compared to the control group CG (11 x 4 mm). The analysis was performed with the photoelastic method (n = 6). Each model comprised 4 implants with the same length and diameter connected by a chromium-cobalt bar that simulates a fixed denture. A 0.15 kg force was applied at the end of the cantilever (15 mm), and the maximum shear stress was recorded around the distal and subsequent implants. The stress values were determined, and the quantitative data (Fringes®) were submitted to statistical analysis with one-way ANOVA and the Dunnett test (p < 0.05). It was observed that the reduction in implant length increased stress values with a significant difference (p < 0.05) between CG Ci7 and Ci5, while the increase in implant diameter reduced the stress values without any differences found between short and long implants. Implants with 5 and 7 mm with regular diameter increased stress levels while short implants with larger diameters experienced similar stress to that of longer implants.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T11:14:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-80c9965e207d4333810fbd1d888ef988
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1807-3107
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T11:14:25Z
publishDate 2017-02-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica
record_format Article
series Brazilian Oral Research
spelling doaj.art-80c9965e207d4333810fbd1d888ef9882022-12-22T02:49:02ZengSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa OdontológicaBrazilian Oral Research1807-31072017-02-0131010.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0018S1806-83242017000100216Short implants to support mandibular complete dentures - photoelastic analysisMarcele Jardim PIMENTELWander José da SILVAAltair Antoninha DEL BEL CURYAbstract This study evaluated the stress behavior around short implants in edentulous atrophic mandibles. Six groups included implants with two diameters regular and wide (4 and 5 mm) and three lengths (5, 7 and 9 mm) as follows: Ci9 (9 x 4 mm), Ci7 (7 x 4 mm), Ci5 (5 x 4 mm), Wi9 (9 x 5 mm), Wi7 (7 x 5 mm) and Wi5 (5 x 5 mm). These groups were compared to the control group CG (11 x 4 mm). The analysis was performed with the photoelastic method (n = 6). Each model comprised 4 implants with the same length and diameter connected by a chromium-cobalt bar that simulates a fixed denture. A 0.15 kg force was applied at the end of the cantilever (15 mm), and the maximum shear stress was recorded around the distal and subsequent implants. The stress values were determined, and the quantitative data (Fringes®) were submitted to statistical analysis with one-way ANOVA and the Dunnett test (p < 0.05). It was observed that the reduction in implant length increased stress values with a significant difference (p < 0.05) between CG Ci7 and Ci5, while the increase in implant diameter reduced the stress values without any differences found between short and long implants. Implants with 5 and 7 mm with regular diameter increased stress levels while short implants with larger diameters experienced similar stress to that of longer implants.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000100216&lng=en&tlng=enDental ImplantsBone ResorptionDentureComplete
spellingShingle Marcele Jardim PIMENTEL
Wander José da SILVA
Altair Antoninha DEL BEL CURY
Short implants to support mandibular complete dentures - photoelastic analysis
Brazilian Oral Research
Dental Implants
Bone Resorption
Denture
Complete
title Short implants to support mandibular complete dentures - photoelastic analysis
title_full Short implants to support mandibular complete dentures - photoelastic analysis
title_fullStr Short implants to support mandibular complete dentures - photoelastic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Short implants to support mandibular complete dentures - photoelastic analysis
title_short Short implants to support mandibular complete dentures - photoelastic analysis
title_sort short implants to support mandibular complete dentures photoelastic analysis
topic Dental Implants
Bone Resorption
Denture
Complete
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000100216&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT marcelejardimpimentel shortimplantstosupportmandibularcompletedenturesphotoelasticanalysis
AT wanderjosedasilva shortimplantstosupportmandibularcompletedenturesphotoelasticanalysis
AT altairantoninhadelbelcury shortimplantstosupportmandibularcompletedenturesphotoelasticanalysis