Establishing Accelerometer Cut-Points to Classify Walking Speed in People Post Stroke

While accelerometers could be used to monitor important domains of walking in daily living (e.g., walking speed), the interpretation of accelerometer data often relies on validation studies performed with healthy participants. The aim of this study was to develop cut-points for waist- and ankle-worn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Moulaee Conradsson, Lucian John-Ross Bezuidenhout
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/11/4080
_version_ 1797491692609208320
author David Moulaee Conradsson
Lucian John-Ross Bezuidenhout
author_facet David Moulaee Conradsson
Lucian John-Ross Bezuidenhout
author_sort David Moulaee Conradsson
collection DOAJ
description While accelerometers could be used to monitor important domains of walking in daily living (e.g., walking speed), the interpretation of accelerometer data often relies on validation studies performed with healthy participants. The aim of this study was to develop cut-points for waist- and ankle-worn accelerometers to differentiate non-ambulation from walking and different walking speeds in people post stroke. Forty-two post-stroke persons wore waist and ankle accelerometers (ActiGraph GT3x+, AG) while performing three non-ambulation activities (i.e., sitting, setting the table and washing dishes) and while walking in self-selected and brisk speeds. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to define AG cut-points for non-ambulation and different walking speeds (0.41–0.8 m/s, 0.81–1.2 m/s and >1.2 m/s) by considering sensor placement, axis, filter setting and epoch length. Optimal data input and sensor placements for measuring walking were a vector magnitude at 15 s epochs for waist- and ankle-worn AG accelerometers, respectively. Across all speed categories, cut-point classification accuracy was good-to-excellent for the ankle-worn AG accelerometer and fair-to-excellent for the waist-worn AG accelerometer, except for between 0.81 and 1.2 m/s. These cut-points can be used for investigating the link between walking and health outcomes in people post stroke.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T00:52:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-80f065260d6042e2a6e1965b61f85581
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T00:52:59Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-80f065260d6042e2a6e1965b61f855812023-11-23T14:48:16ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202022-05-012211408010.3390/s22114080Establishing Accelerometer Cut-Points to Classify Walking Speed in People Post StrokeDavid Moulaee Conradsson0Lucian John-Ross Bezuidenhout1Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, 141 83 Stockholm, SwedenDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, 141 83 Stockholm, SwedenWhile accelerometers could be used to monitor important domains of walking in daily living (e.g., walking speed), the interpretation of accelerometer data often relies on validation studies performed with healthy participants. The aim of this study was to develop cut-points for waist- and ankle-worn accelerometers to differentiate non-ambulation from walking and different walking speeds in people post stroke. Forty-two post-stroke persons wore waist and ankle accelerometers (ActiGraph GT3x+, AG) while performing three non-ambulation activities (i.e., sitting, setting the table and washing dishes) and while walking in self-selected and brisk speeds. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to define AG cut-points for non-ambulation and different walking speeds (0.41–0.8 m/s, 0.81–1.2 m/s and >1.2 m/s) by considering sensor placement, axis, filter setting and epoch length. Optimal data input and sensor placements for measuring walking were a vector magnitude at 15 s epochs for waist- and ankle-worn AG accelerometers, respectively. Across all speed categories, cut-point classification accuracy was good-to-excellent for the ankle-worn AG accelerometer and fair-to-excellent for the waist-worn AG accelerometer, except for between 0.81 and 1.2 m/s. These cut-points can be used for investigating the link between walking and health outcomes in people post stroke.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/11/4080accelerometersActiGraphgait speedobjective measurementROC analysisstroke
spellingShingle David Moulaee Conradsson
Lucian John-Ross Bezuidenhout
Establishing Accelerometer Cut-Points to Classify Walking Speed in People Post Stroke
Sensors
accelerometers
ActiGraph
gait speed
objective measurement
ROC analysis
stroke
title Establishing Accelerometer Cut-Points to Classify Walking Speed in People Post Stroke
title_full Establishing Accelerometer Cut-Points to Classify Walking Speed in People Post Stroke
title_fullStr Establishing Accelerometer Cut-Points to Classify Walking Speed in People Post Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Establishing Accelerometer Cut-Points to Classify Walking Speed in People Post Stroke
title_short Establishing Accelerometer Cut-Points to Classify Walking Speed in People Post Stroke
title_sort establishing accelerometer cut points to classify walking speed in people post stroke
topic accelerometers
ActiGraph
gait speed
objective measurement
ROC analysis
stroke
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/11/4080
work_keys_str_mv AT davidmoulaeeconradsson establishingaccelerometercutpointstoclassifywalkingspeedinpeoplepoststroke
AT lucianjohnrossbezuidenhout establishingaccelerometercutpointstoclassifywalkingspeedinpeoplepoststroke