What hinders and helps academics to conduct Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the field of nutrition and physical activity? An international perspective
Abstract Background Ineffective research-practice translation is a major challenge to population health improvement. This paper presents an international perspective on the barriers and facilitators associated with the uptake of and engagement in Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research i...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-0909-z |
| _version_ | 1830132308124893184 |
|---|---|
| author | Harriet Koorts Patti-Jean Naylor Rachel Laws Penelope Love Jaimie-Lee Maple Femke van Nassau |
| author_facet | Harriet Koorts Patti-Jean Naylor Rachel Laws Penelope Love Jaimie-Lee Maple Femke van Nassau |
| author_sort | Harriet Koorts |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Ineffective research-practice translation is a major challenge to population health improvement. This paper presents an international perspective on the barriers and facilitators associated with the uptake of and engagement in Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the fields of physical activity and nutrition. Methods A mixed methods study involving participants from the International Society for Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (ISBNPA) network. Participants completed an online survey (May–July 2018) and/or participated in a focus group during the annual ISBNPA conference (June 2018). Descriptive statistics were generated for quantitative online and pre-focus group survey data. Fisher’s exact tests investigated associations of (i) length of time in academia, (ii) career stage and (iii) country of work, and agreement with ‘perceptions of D&I’. Qualitative data were analysed thematically. Results In total, 141 participants responded to the survey (76% female, 21% aged 35–39 years, 14 countries represented) and 25 participated in focus groups (n = 3). Participants self-identified as having knowledge (48%), skills (53%) and experience supporting others (40%) to conduct D&I research. The majority (96%) perceived D&I was important, with 66% having organizational support for D&I, yet only 52% reported prioritizing D&I research. Perceptions of D&I differed by length of time in academia, career stage and country of work. Barriers included: (i) lack of D&I expertise; (ii) lack of organisational support/value for D&I; (iii) embedded scientific beliefs/culture; (iv) methodological challenges with D&I research; (v) funding/publishing priorities and; (vi) academic performance structures. Facilitators included: (i) increased presence/value of D&I; (ii) collective advocacy; (iii) organisational support for D&I; (iv) recruitment of D&I scientists and; (v) restructure of academic performance models, funding/publishing criteria. Conclusions Individual, organisational and system-wide factors hindered academics’ engagement with and support for D&I research, which was perceived to reduce opportunities for research-practice translation. Factors were mostly consistent across countries and individual career stages/time spent in academia. Embedding D&I early within academic training, and system-wide reorientation of academic performance and funding structures to promote and facilitate D&I research, are some of the necessary actions to reduce the research-practice gap. Consistent with public health more broadly, these changes are long overdue in the fields of physical activity and nutrition. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T06:32:21Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-80f0820936b74c4f8a1a141dbb8244eb |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1479-5868 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T06:32:21Z |
| publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity |
| spelling | doaj.art-80f0820936b74c4f8a1a141dbb8244eb2022-12-21T22:00:07ZengBMCInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity1479-58682020-01-0117111210.1186/s12966-020-0909-zWhat hinders and helps academics to conduct Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the field of nutrition and physical activity? An international perspectiveHarriet Koorts0Patti-Jean Naylor1Rachel Laws2Penelope Love3Jaimie-Lee Maple4Femke van Nassau5Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin UniversitySchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of VictoriaInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin UniversityInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin UniversityInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin UniversityDepartment of Public and Occupational Health and Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAbstract Background Ineffective research-practice translation is a major challenge to population health improvement. This paper presents an international perspective on the barriers and facilitators associated with the uptake of and engagement in Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the fields of physical activity and nutrition. Methods A mixed methods study involving participants from the International Society for Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (ISBNPA) network. Participants completed an online survey (May–July 2018) and/or participated in a focus group during the annual ISBNPA conference (June 2018). Descriptive statistics were generated for quantitative online and pre-focus group survey data. Fisher’s exact tests investigated associations of (i) length of time in academia, (ii) career stage and (iii) country of work, and agreement with ‘perceptions of D&I’. Qualitative data were analysed thematically. Results In total, 141 participants responded to the survey (76% female, 21% aged 35–39 years, 14 countries represented) and 25 participated in focus groups (n = 3). Participants self-identified as having knowledge (48%), skills (53%) and experience supporting others (40%) to conduct D&I research. The majority (96%) perceived D&I was important, with 66% having organizational support for D&I, yet only 52% reported prioritizing D&I research. Perceptions of D&I differed by length of time in academia, career stage and country of work. Barriers included: (i) lack of D&I expertise; (ii) lack of organisational support/value for D&I; (iii) embedded scientific beliefs/culture; (iv) methodological challenges with D&I research; (v) funding/publishing priorities and; (vi) academic performance structures. Facilitators included: (i) increased presence/value of D&I; (ii) collective advocacy; (iii) organisational support for D&I; (iv) recruitment of D&I scientists and; (v) restructure of academic performance models, funding/publishing criteria. Conclusions Individual, organisational and system-wide factors hindered academics’ engagement with and support for D&I research, which was perceived to reduce opportunities for research-practice translation. Factors were mostly consistent across countries and individual career stages/time spent in academia. Embedding D&I early within academic training, and system-wide reorientation of academic performance and funding structures to promote and facilitate D&I research, are some of the necessary actions to reduce the research-practice gap. Consistent with public health more broadly, these changes are long overdue in the fields of physical activity and nutrition.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-0909-zImplementationDisseminationTranslationPhysical activityNutritionAcademia |
| spellingShingle | Harriet Koorts Patti-Jean Naylor Rachel Laws Penelope Love Jaimie-Lee Maple Femke van Nassau What hinders and helps academics to conduct Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the field of nutrition and physical activity? An international perspective International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity Implementation Dissemination Translation Physical activity Nutrition Academia |
| title | What hinders and helps academics to conduct Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the field of nutrition and physical activity? An international perspective |
| title_full | What hinders and helps academics to conduct Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the field of nutrition and physical activity? An international perspective |
| title_fullStr | What hinders and helps academics to conduct Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the field of nutrition and physical activity? An international perspective |
| title_full_unstemmed | What hinders and helps academics to conduct Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the field of nutrition and physical activity? An international perspective |
| title_short | What hinders and helps academics to conduct Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the field of nutrition and physical activity? An international perspective |
| title_sort | what hinders and helps academics to conduct dissemination and implementation d i research in the field of nutrition and physical activity an international perspective |
| topic | Implementation Dissemination Translation Physical activity Nutrition Academia |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-020-0909-z |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT harrietkoorts whathindersandhelpsacademicstoconductdisseminationandimplementationdiresearchinthefieldofnutritionandphysicalactivityaninternationalperspective AT pattijeannaylor whathindersandhelpsacademicstoconductdisseminationandimplementationdiresearchinthefieldofnutritionandphysicalactivityaninternationalperspective AT rachellaws whathindersandhelpsacademicstoconductdisseminationandimplementationdiresearchinthefieldofnutritionandphysicalactivityaninternationalperspective AT penelopelove whathindersandhelpsacademicstoconductdisseminationandimplementationdiresearchinthefieldofnutritionandphysicalactivityaninternationalperspective AT jaimieleemaple whathindersandhelpsacademicstoconductdisseminationandimplementationdiresearchinthefieldofnutritionandphysicalactivityaninternationalperspective AT femkevannassau whathindersandhelpsacademicstoconductdisseminationandimplementationdiresearchinthefieldofnutritionandphysicalactivityaninternationalperspective |