Step-by-Step Immune Activation for Suicide Gene Therapy Reinforcement

Gene-directed enzyme prodrug gene therapy (GDEPT) theoretically represents a useful method to carry out chemotherapy for cancer with minimal side effects through the formation of a chemotherapeutic agent inside cancer cells. However, despite great efforts, promising preliminary results, and a long p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irina Alekseenko, Alexey Kuzmich, Liya Kondratyeva, Sofia Kondratieva, Victor Pleshkan, Eugene Sverdlov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/17/9376
_version_ 1797521377791574016
author Irina Alekseenko
Alexey Kuzmich
Liya Kondratyeva
Sofia Kondratieva
Victor Pleshkan
Eugene Sverdlov
author_facet Irina Alekseenko
Alexey Kuzmich
Liya Kondratyeva
Sofia Kondratieva
Victor Pleshkan
Eugene Sverdlov
author_sort Irina Alekseenko
collection DOAJ
description Gene-directed enzyme prodrug gene therapy (GDEPT) theoretically represents a useful method to carry out chemotherapy for cancer with minimal side effects through the formation of a chemotherapeutic agent inside cancer cells. However, despite great efforts, promising preliminary results, and a long period of time (over 25 years) since the first mention of this method, GDEPT has not yet reached the clinic. There is a growing consensus that optimal cancer therapies should generate robust tumor-specific immune responses. The advent of checkpoint immunotherapy has yielded new highly promising avenues of study in cancer therapy. For such therapy, it seems reasonable to use combinations of different immunomodulators alongside traditional methods, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, as well as GDEPT. In this review, we focused on non-viral gene immunotherapy systems combining the intratumoral production of toxins diffused by GDEPT and immunomodulatory molecules. Special attention was paid to the applications and mechanisms of action of the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM–CSF), a cytokine that is widely used but shows contradictory effects. Another method to enhance the formation of stable immune responses in a tumor, the use of danger signals, is also discussed. The process of dying from GDEPT cancer cells initiates danger signaling by releasing damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that exert immature dendritic cells by increasing antigen uptake, maturation, and antigen presentation to cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. We hypothesized that the combined action of this danger signal and GM–CSF issued from the same dying cancer cell within a limited space would focus on a limited pool of immature dendritic cells, thus acting synergistically and enhancing their maturation and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte attraction potential. We also discuss the problem of enhancing the cancer specificity of the combined GDEPT–GM–CSF–danger signal system by means of artificial cancer specific promoters or a modified delivery system.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T08:10:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-80f2872fe8844bfc8af30fdeaca0b90d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1661-6596
1422-0067
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T08:10:51Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series International Journal of Molecular Sciences
spelling doaj.art-80f2872fe8844bfc8af30fdeaca0b90d2023-11-22T10:42:30ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences1661-65961422-00672021-08-012217937610.3390/ijms22179376Step-by-Step Immune Activation for Suicide Gene Therapy ReinforcementIrina Alekseenko0Alexey Kuzmich1Liya Kondratyeva2Sofia Kondratieva3Victor Pleshkan4Eugene Sverdlov5Institute of Molecular Genetics of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 123182 Moscow, RussiaInstitute of Molecular Genetics of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 123182 Moscow, RussiaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, RussiaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, RussiaInstitute of Molecular Genetics of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 123182 Moscow, RussiaInstitute of Molecular Genetics of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 123182 Moscow, RussiaGene-directed enzyme prodrug gene therapy (GDEPT) theoretically represents a useful method to carry out chemotherapy for cancer with minimal side effects through the formation of a chemotherapeutic agent inside cancer cells. However, despite great efforts, promising preliminary results, and a long period of time (over 25 years) since the first mention of this method, GDEPT has not yet reached the clinic. There is a growing consensus that optimal cancer therapies should generate robust tumor-specific immune responses. The advent of checkpoint immunotherapy has yielded new highly promising avenues of study in cancer therapy. For such therapy, it seems reasonable to use combinations of different immunomodulators alongside traditional methods, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, as well as GDEPT. In this review, we focused on non-viral gene immunotherapy systems combining the intratumoral production of toxins diffused by GDEPT and immunomodulatory molecules. Special attention was paid to the applications and mechanisms of action of the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM–CSF), a cytokine that is widely used but shows contradictory effects. Another method to enhance the formation of stable immune responses in a tumor, the use of danger signals, is also discussed. The process of dying from GDEPT cancer cells initiates danger signaling by releasing damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that exert immature dendritic cells by increasing antigen uptake, maturation, and antigen presentation to cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. We hypothesized that the combined action of this danger signal and GM–CSF issued from the same dying cancer cell within a limited space would focus on a limited pool of immature dendritic cells, thus acting synergistically and enhancing their maturation and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte attraction potential. We also discuss the problem of enhancing the cancer specificity of the combined GDEPT–GM–CSF–danger signal system by means of artificial cancer specific promoters or a modified delivery system.https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/17/9376cancertumorimmunosuppressionsuicide gene therapyimmunotherapyGM–CSF
spellingShingle Irina Alekseenko
Alexey Kuzmich
Liya Kondratyeva
Sofia Kondratieva
Victor Pleshkan
Eugene Sverdlov
Step-by-Step Immune Activation for Suicide Gene Therapy Reinforcement
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
cancer
tumor
immunosuppression
suicide gene therapy
immunotherapy
GM–CSF
title Step-by-Step Immune Activation for Suicide Gene Therapy Reinforcement
title_full Step-by-Step Immune Activation for Suicide Gene Therapy Reinforcement
title_fullStr Step-by-Step Immune Activation for Suicide Gene Therapy Reinforcement
title_full_unstemmed Step-by-Step Immune Activation for Suicide Gene Therapy Reinforcement
title_short Step-by-Step Immune Activation for Suicide Gene Therapy Reinforcement
title_sort step by step immune activation for suicide gene therapy reinforcement
topic cancer
tumor
immunosuppression
suicide gene therapy
immunotherapy
GM–CSF
url https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/17/9376
work_keys_str_mv AT irinaalekseenko stepbystepimmuneactivationforsuicidegenetherapyreinforcement
AT alexeykuzmich stepbystepimmuneactivationforsuicidegenetherapyreinforcement
AT liyakondratyeva stepbystepimmuneactivationforsuicidegenetherapyreinforcement
AT sofiakondratieva stepbystepimmuneactivationforsuicidegenetherapyreinforcement
AT victorpleshkan stepbystepimmuneactivationforsuicidegenetherapyreinforcement
AT eugenesverdlov stepbystepimmuneactivationforsuicidegenetherapyreinforcement