ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test

Since the animal test ban on cosmetics in the EU in 2013, alternative in vitro safety tests have been actively researched to replace in vivo animal tests. For the development and evaluation of a new test method, reference chemicals with quality in vivo data are essential to assess the predictive cap...

Olles dieđut

Bibliográfalaš dieđut
Váldodahkkit: Juhee Han, Ga-Young Lee, Green Bae, Mi-Jeong Kang, Kyung-Min Lim
Materiálatiipa: Artihkal
Giella:English
Almmustuhtton: MDPI AG 2021-11-01
Ráidu:Toxics
Fáttát:
Liŋkkat:https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6304/9/11/314
_version_ 1827675306631102464
author Juhee Han
Ga-Young Lee
Green Bae
Mi-Jeong Kang
Kyung-Min Lim
author_facet Juhee Han
Ga-Young Lee
Green Bae
Mi-Jeong Kang
Kyung-Min Lim
author_sort Juhee Han
collection DOAJ
description Since the animal test ban on cosmetics in the EU in 2013, alternative in vitro safety tests have been actively researched to replace in vivo animal tests. For the development and evaluation of a new test method, reference chemicals with quality in vivo data are essential to assess the predictive capacity and applicability domain. Here, we compiled a reference chemical database (ChemSkin DB) for the development and evaluation of new in vitro skin irritation tests. The first candidates were selected from 317 chemicals (source data <i>n</i> = 1567) searched from the literature from the last 20 years, including previous validation study reports, ECETOC, and published papers. Chemicals showing inconsistent classification or those that were commercially unavailable, difficult or dangerous to handle, prohibitively expensive, or without quality in vivo or in vitro data were removed, leaving a total of 100 chemicals. Supporting references, in vivo Draize scores, UN GHS/EU CLP classifications and commercial sources were compiled. Test results produced by the approved methods of OECD Test No. 439 were included and compared using the classification table, scatter plot, and Pearson correlation analysis to identify the false predictions and differences between in vitro skin irritation tests. These results may provide an insight into the future development of new in vitro skin irritation tests.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T05:01:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-80ffed2e6910469e901b732192c510be
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2305-6304
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T05:01:15Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Toxics
spelling doaj.art-80ffed2e6910469e901b732192c510be2023-11-23T01:48:13ZengMDPI AGToxics2305-63042021-11-0191131410.3390/toxics9110314ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation TestJuhee Han0Ga-Young Lee1Green Bae2Mi-Jeong Kang3Kyung-Min Lim4College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, KoreaCollege of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, KoreaCollege of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, KoreaKorea Water Resources Environment Institute, Gyeongsan 38650, KoreaCollege of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, KoreaSince the animal test ban on cosmetics in the EU in 2013, alternative in vitro safety tests have been actively researched to replace in vivo animal tests. For the development and evaluation of a new test method, reference chemicals with quality in vivo data are essential to assess the predictive capacity and applicability domain. Here, we compiled a reference chemical database (ChemSkin DB) for the development and evaluation of new in vitro skin irritation tests. The first candidates were selected from 317 chemicals (source data <i>n</i> = 1567) searched from the literature from the last 20 years, including previous validation study reports, ECETOC, and published papers. Chemicals showing inconsistent classification or those that were commercially unavailable, difficult or dangerous to handle, prohibitively expensive, or without quality in vivo or in vitro data were removed, leaving a total of 100 chemicals. Supporting references, in vivo Draize scores, UN GHS/EU CLP classifications and commercial sources were compiled. Test results produced by the approved methods of OECD Test No. 439 were included and compared using the classification table, scatter plot, and Pearson correlation analysis to identify the false predictions and differences between in vitro skin irritation tests. These results may provide an insight into the future development of new in vitro skin irritation tests.https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6304/9/11/314skin irritation testreference chemicalalternative test methodchemical database
spellingShingle Juhee Han
Ga-Young Lee
Green Bae
Mi-Jeong Kang
Kyung-Min Lim
ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
Toxics
skin irritation test
reference chemical
alternative test method
chemical database
title ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title_full ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title_fullStr ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title_full_unstemmed ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title_short ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title_sort chemskin reference chemical database for the development of an in vitro skin irritation test
topic skin irritation test
reference chemical
alternative test method
chemical database
url https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6304/9/11/314
work_keys_str_mv AT juheehan chemskinreferencechemicaldatabaseforthedevelopmentofaninvitroskinirritationtest
AT gayounglee chemskinreferencechemicaldatabaseforthedevelopmentofaninvitroskinirritationtest
AT greenbae chemskinreferencechemicaldatabaseforthedevelopmentofaninvitroskinirritationtest
AT mijeongkang chemskinreferencechemicaldatabaseforthedevelopmentofaninvitroskinirritationtest
AT kyungminlim chemskinreferencechemicaldatabaseforthedevelopmentofaninvitroskinirritationtest